Paul Michael TaylorChristopher R. PolglaseNajaf MuseyibliJared M. KollerTroy A. Johnson
Past and Future Heritagein the Pipelines Corridor Azerbaijan Georgia Turkey
pol maikl teiloriqristofer r. folgleisinajaf museiblijared m. qoleriTroiAa. jonsoni
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliazerbaijani saqarTvelo TurqeTi
Past and Future Heritagein the Pipelines CorridorAzerbaijanGeorgiaTurkey
Past and Future Heritagein the Pipelines CorridorAzerbaijanGeorgiaTurkey
kulturuli memkvidreobis
ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi,
warsuli da momavali
azerbaijani, GsaqarTvelo, TurqeTi
Past and Future Heritagein the Pipelines CorridorAzerbaijanGeorgiaTurkey
NewdiscoveriesfromexcavationsbytheInstituteofArchaeologyandEthnography(Baku,Azerbaijan),theGeorgianNationalMuseum(Tbilisi,Georgia),
andGaziUniversity(Ankara,Turkey)
AsianCulturalHistoryProgramSmithsonianInstitution
PaulMichaelTaylorChristopher R. Polglase
NajafMuseyibliJaredM.KollerTroyA.Johnson
pol maikl teilori
qristofer r. folgleisi
najaf museibli
jared m. qoleri
Troi a. jonsoni
arqeologiis institutis (baqo, azerbaijani), saqarTvelos erovnuli muzeumisa (Tbilisi, saqarTvelo) da gazis universitetis (ankara, TurqeTi) axali arqeologiuri aRmoCenebiA
aziis kulturis istoriis programasmiTsonis instituti (vaSingtoni, aSS)
Past and Future Heritagein the Pipelines CorridorAzerbaijanGeorgiaTurkey
kulturuli memkvidreobis
ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi,
warsuli da momavali
azerbaijani, GsaqarTvelo, TurqeTi
ThispublicationisthefirstproductofgrantnumberG-08-BPCS-151448fromBPExplorationCaspianSeaLtdtotheSmithsonianInstitution,entitled“ProvisionoftheCulturalHeritagePublicOutreachandCapacityBuildingProgrammeintheAGTPipelineCorridorRegions.”
Anonlinepublicationonthistopicwiththetitle“AGT:AncientHeritageintheBTC-SCPPipelinesCorridor,Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey”accompaniesthisbookandmaybefoundathttp://www.agt.si.edu.Visitorstothiswebsitewillfindarchaeologicalsitereportsandamoreextensivebibliography.
Copyright©2011,SmithsonianInstitutionAsianCulturalHistoryProgram,Washington,D.C.DesignbyKIGraphics,Inc.Thisbookissimultaneouslyissuedintwobilingualeditions:English-AzerbaijaniandEnglish-Georgian.ISBN:English-Azerbaijani:9780972455749(softcover);9780972455763(hardcover),English-Georgian:9780972455756(softcover);9780972455770(hardcover).
Secondprinting(April2011)
es publikaciaBPExplorationCaspianSeaLtd- is mier smiTsonis institutisaTvis
gacemuli grantis (G-08-BPCS-151448) - “sazogadoebisaTvis kulturuli memkvidreobis
gacnoba da azerbaijani – saqarTvelo –
TurqeTi milsadenebis derefnis regionSi
“SesaZleblobaTa ganviTarebis” programis
pirveli produqtia. G
am Temasve Seexeba eleqtronuli publikacia,
romlis saTauria: “azerbaijani, saqarTvelo,
TurqeTi - kulturuli memkvidreobaBTC/SCP-is derefanSi “. igi wignTan erTad gamoqveyndeba da
misi naxva SesaZlebeli iqneba saitze: http://www.achp.si.edu/agt. saitis meSveobiT SesaZlebeli
iqneba arqeologiuri Zeglebis gaTxrebis
angariSebisa da sruli bibliografiis gacnoba.
saavtoro ufleba © 2011, smiTsonis institutis
aziis kulturis istoriis programa
es wigni erTdroulad inglisur – azerbaijanul
da inglisur - qarTul, orenovan gamocemad
gamodis. ISBN: inglisur – azerbaijanuli:
9780972455749 (rbili yda); 9780972455763 (magari
garekani), inglisur - qarTuli: 9780972455756
(rbili yda); 9780972455770 (magari garekani).
SmithsonianInstitution
Cataloging-in-PublicationData(U.S.A.)Pastandfutureheritageinthepipelinescorridor:Azerbaijan,Georgia,Turkey=Kulturuliemkvidreobis żeglebimilsadenebisderep‛anši,carsulidamomavali:Azerbaijani,Sak‛art‛velo,T‛urk‛et‛i/Paul MichaelTaylor…[etal.]. p. cm.EnglishandGeorgian.Includesbibliographicalreferences.ISBN-13:978-09724557-5-6(softcover);978-09724557-7-0(hardcover)1.Excavations(Archaeology)—Azerbaijan.2.Excavations(Archaeology)—Georgia(Republic).3.Excavations(Archaeology)—Turkey,Eastern.4.Azerbaijan—Antiquities.5.Georgia(Republic)— Antiquities.6.Turkey,Eastern—Antiquities.7.Silkroad—Antiquities.8.Petroleumpipelines—Caucasus,South.9.Petroleumpipelines—Turkey,Eastern.I.Taylor,PaulMichael,1953-II.NationalMuseumofNaturalHistory(U.S.).AsianCulturalHistoryProgram.DS56.P3722010
CHAPTER1 FromtheCaspiantotheMediterranean 14
CHAPTER2 CulturalHistoryattheCrossroads 42
CHAPTER3 ArchaeologicalSitesalongthePipeline 128 • Dashbulaq(Azerbaijan) 136 • Zayamchai/Tovuzchai(Azerbaijan) 140 • HasansuKurgan(Azerbaijan) 150 • Saphar-Kharaba(Georgia) 152 • Klde(Georgia) 156 • Orchosani(Georgia) 162 • Güllüdere(Turkey) 166 • Ziyaretsuyu(Turkey) 172 • Yüceören(Turkey) 176
CHAPTER4 NurturingaSharedHeritage 180
Acknowledgements 212
Site Report Citations 216
Recommended Readings 224
TableofContents
Tavi 1 Fkaspiidan xmelTaSuazRvispireTamde 14Tavi 2 kulturaTa istoria gzajvaredinze 42Tavi 3 Aarqeologiuri Zeglebi milsadenis derefanSi 128 • daSbulaqi (azerbaijani) 136 • zaiamCai / TovuzCai (azerbaijani) 140H • hasansus yorRani (azerbaijani) 150 • safar-xaraba (saqarTvelo) 152 • klde (saqarTvelo) 156O • orWosani (saqarTvelo) 162Gü • guludere (TurqeTi) 166 • ziareTsuiu (TurqeTi) 172 • ieqeioreni (TurqeTi) 176Tavi 4 vufrTxildebiT saerTo memkvidreobas 180madloba gaweuli samuSaosaTvis 212arqeologiuri gaTxrebis citirebuli angariSebi 216rekomendebuli sakiTxavi 224
sarCevi
Rock art displaying two human figures interlockinghands at the Gobustan National Historical-ArtisticPreserve.
gobusTanis istoriul-arqeologiur nakrZalSi, kldeze gamosaxulia ori adamiani, romelTac xelebi erTmaneTisken aqvT gawvdili.
A view of excavation activities along theBaku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline in Georgia.
saqarTvelo, Bbaqo-Tbilisi-jeihanis navTobsadenis (BTC) maxloblad mimdinare arqeologiuriAgaTxrebis xedi
The Sultanahmet Mosque (also known as theBlue Mosque) in Istanbul was commissioned bySultan Ahmet I and completed during the early17th century AD.
sulTan ahmedis meCeTis (cnobilia, rogorc lurji meCeTi) mSenebloba stambulSi sulTan ahmed I-is mmarTvelobis dros daiwyo da XVII saukuneSi damTavrda.
An artisan crafting beautiful traditional metal waresin Azerbaijan.
azerbaijaneli xelosani amzadebs liTonis tradiciul nivTebs.
An Azerbaijani woman baking flatbread (chorek) ina wood-fired tandir.
azerbaijaneli qali acxobs purs ToneSi.
The famous defensive walls and Maiden’s Tower ofIchari Shahar (Baku’s “inner city”) were constructedin the 12th century AD.
Zveli baqos damcavi galavani da saxelganTqmuli `qalwulis koSki” XII saukuneSia agebuli.
Tbilisi, a city of roughly one and a half millionpeople, is the capital and largest city of Georgia,gracing the banks of the Mtkyvari (Kura) River inthe eastern part of the country.
Tbilisi, daaxloebiT milionnaxevriani qalaqi, saqarTvelos dedaqalaqia da mdebareobs qveynis aRmosavleT nawilSi, md. mtkvris napirebze.
Magnificently spanning the Bosporus Strait, theFirst Bosporus Bridge in Istanbul connects Orakoy(in Europe) and Beylerbeyi (in Asia). Completed in1973, the bridge embodies Turkey’s historic rolelinking Europe and Asia.
bosforis sruteze gadWimuli pirveli xidi, romelic stambulis or nawils _evropulsa (oraqoi) da aziurs (beilerbei) aerTebs, 1973 wels aSenda da TurqeTis - evropisa da aziis damakavSirebeli saxelmwifos istoriul rols usvams xazs.
–BTCRoute– SCP Route
A map of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) and SouthCaucasus (SCP) pipelines, from the Caspian to theMediterranean.
baqo-Tbilisi-jeihanisa (BTC) da samxreT kavkasiis milsadenebis (SCP) ruka kaspiidan xmelTaSuazRvispireTamde.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor22
CHAPTER1
From the Caspian to the Mediterranean
Tavi 1
kaspiidanxmelTaSuazRvispireTamde
Pproeqtis mizani
samxreTi kavkasia da
anatolia moicavs dRevandel
azerbaijans, saqarTvelosa
da TurqeTs. regioni
msoflios uZvelesi kulturebis
erT-erTi samSobloa. aq aRmoCenilma
preistoriulma da istoriulma
kulturebma udidesi arqeologiuri
saganZuri datova, rac arqeologebisa
da istorikosebis did dainteresebas
iwvevs. azerbaijanSi, gobusTanis
kldeebze, romelic kaspiis zRvas
gadahyurebs, daaxloebiT 20000 wlis
winandeli navebis, cxovelebisa da
adamianebis gamosaxulebebia.
ThePurposeofThisProject
TheCaucasusandAnatolia,includingthepresent-daynationsofAzerbaijan,Georgia,andTurkey,arehometosomeofthe
world’smostancientcultures.Throughouttheregion,prehistoricandhistoricculturesleftavastwealthofarchaeologicaltreasuresthat fascinate archaeologists and historians. InAzerbaijan,themajesticrockfacesofGobustanthatprojecthighabovetheshoreoftheCaspianSeaformthe“canvas”onwhich hundreds of generations of artists inscribedtheirancientrockart,beginningperhaps20,000yearsago.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 23
The city of Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan,overlooks the Caspian Sea. Today, Baku is athriving metropolis of over two million people. Itis the financial center of Azerbaijan, as well asthe nucleus of the country’s artistic, musical, andtheatrical activities.
azerbaijanis dedaqalaqi baqo kaspiis zRvas gadahyurebs. es ormilioniani, ayvavebuli qalaqi qveynis ekonomikuri da kulturuli centricaa.
Imagesofboats,animals,andpeoplefromAzerbaijan’sancientpastcanbefoundamongtherockart.Theearliesttracesofhumankind’sprehistoryinthisancientlandwerefoundatDmanisi,Georgia,wheretheremainsofhumanity’s1.8million-year-oldancestorswerediscovered.InTurkey,anintriguingrepositoryofpotteryatZiyaretsuyuthatcanbetracedtothe2ndcenturyBCraisesabsorbingquestionsabouttravelersandsettlersintheregion.
Forthousandsofyears,silk,gold,ivory,spices,and perfumes were transported across trade routes throughtheregionthatconnectedEastAsia,Africa,theMiddleEast,andEurope.Thepeoplesoftheregionarejustlyproudthattodayitshistoricstatus as a crossroad of trade and culture is being revived.Thisrevivalispartlyaresultofnationalindependence since the dissolution of the Soviet UnionandpartlyduetotherelativelyrecentdiscoveryofnewlargeCaspianBasinhydrocarbonreserves.TheconstructionofthemassivepipelinessystemthatcarriesbothcrudeoilandnaturalgasthroughAzerbaijan,Georgia,andTurkeytoworldmarketsspurredanunparalleledperiodofarchaeologicalresearchintheregion,whichledtoextraordinaryfindsalongthepipelinesroutefromtheCaspiantotheMediterranean,andgeneratedknowledgeaboutthehistoryandculturesoftheregion.Inthisandinmanylesstangibleways,thepipelinesareanewgatewaytotheregion’spast,and open a promising window to its future.
isini azerbaijanis warsuls warmogvidgens.
adamianis preistoriuli warsulis
uadresi nimuSia saqarTveloSi, dmanisSi,
1,8 milioni wlis hominidebis naSTebi.
TurqeTSi, ziareTsuius Zv.w. II saukuniT
daTariRebuli Tixis WurWlis sacavi am
periodis mosaxleobisa da mogzaurebis
Sesaxeb gviambobs.
aTaswleulebis ganmavlobaSi am mxareze
gadioda Sua aziis, axlo aRmosavleTis,
afrikisa da evropis damakavSirebeli
savaWro gzebi, romlebiTac abreSumi,
oqro da nelsacxeblebi gadaqondaT.
sabWoTa kavSiris daSlis, saqarTvelosa
da azerbaijanis mier damoukideblobis
mopovebisa da kaspiis zRvaSi navTobis
didi maragis aRmoCenis Semdeg regionma
savaWro gzajvaredinis funqcia xelaxla
SeiZina. navTobisa da gazis milsadenebis
mSeneblobasTan, romelic regionis qveynebs:
azerbaijans, saqarTvelosa da TurqeTs
msoflio bazarTan akavSirebs. milsadenebis
mSeneblobasTanavea dakavSirebuli
uprecendento masStabis arqeologiuri
gaTxrebi, ramac uaRresad saintereso
masala mogvca istoriuli da kulturuli
suraTis Sesavsebad. amrigad, milsadenebis
mSeneblobam warsuli ufro xelSesaxebi,
momavali ki saimedo gaxada.
warmodgenil wignSi Tavmoyrili masala
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor24
The Azerbaijan Government House is an imposingstructure. After formally declaring independencefrom the Soviet Union in 1991, Azerbaijan’s firstelected Parliament officially adopted a constitutionin 1995.
azerbaijanis mTavrobis sasaxle didi Senobaa. 1991 wels aq gamocxadda azerbaijanis damoukidebloba, pirvelma parlamentma ki qveynis konstitucia 1995 wels miiRo.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 25
The Ateshgah “Fire Worshipers” Temple nearBaku has its origins among Zoroastrians. Acontinuous flame on the site was once fed bynatural gas deposits.
cecxlTayvanismcemlebis taZari aTeSga, romelic baqos maxlobladaa, zoroastrizmis mimdevarTa salocavi iyo. “maradiuli cecxli”, romelic am salocavze iyo danTebuli, gazis sabadodan ikvebeboda.
warmodgenil wignSi Tavmoyrili masala
warmoaCens regionis mdidar kulturul
memkvidreobas, romelic qarTvelma,
azerbaijanelma da Turqma arqeologebma
aRmoCenes. aqve aseve SesaZlebelia
gavecnoT am qveynebis warmomadgenlebis
TanamSromloba smiTsonis institutis
aziis kulturis istoriis ganyofilebasTan,
politikisa da analizis ganyofilebasa
da mTavar sainformacio samsaxurTan.
restavracia, koleqciebis marTva da
mopovebuliAarqeologiuri masalis
interpretacia BP-isa da misi partniorebis mier dafinansda, raTa baqo-Tbilisi-
jeihanis navTobsadenisa da samxreT
kavkasiis gazsadenis mSeneblobisas
aRmoCenili kulturuli memkvidreobis
naSTebi kargad yofiliyo daculi.
milsadenis marSrutis Seswavla 2000
wels daiwyo, samSeneblo samuSaoebi ki -
2003 wels. am procesSi Tavidanve iyvnen
Cabmulebi azerbaijaneli, qarTveli, Turqi,
britaneli da amerikeli arqeologebi. isini
mSeneblobis paralelurad muSaobdnen
da maT milsadenebis gaswvriv gaTxares
aramarto ukve cnobili Zeglebi, aramed
aqamde ucnobi asobiT arqeologiuri Zegli
aRmoaCines da Seiswavles.
Tohighlighttherichculturalheritageoftheregion,thisbookpresentsfindingsofacollaborativeresearch initiative among archaeologists in Azerbaijan,Georgia,andTurkeyandtheircolleaguesfromtheSmithsonianInstitution’sAsianCulturalHistoryProgram,OfficeofPolicyandAnalysis,andOfficeoftheChiefInformationOfficer.Therecovery,collectionmanagement,andinterpretation of the archaeological data presented herewerefinancedbyBPanditscoventurersintheCaspianprojectsaspartoftheireffortstoprotect the cultural resources uncovered during theconstructionoftheBaku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan(BTC)crudeoilandadjacentSouthCaucasus(SCP)naturalgaspipelines.Thearchaeologicalsurveysofthepipelineroutebeganin2000,beforeconstructioncommenced.Theconstruction,whichbeganin2003,wasaccompaniedbyteamsofAzerbaijani,Georgian,Turkish,British,andAmericanarchaeologists who traveled the entire length of thepipelines,ajourneythatcontributedtothestoryofknownarchaeologicalsitesinadditiontodiscoveringhundredsofpreviouslyunknownandunexcavated sites.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 25
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor26
The salamuri, a Georgian reed instrument made ofapricot wood, is often played at festivals by boyswearing traditional costumes.
saqarTveloSi gamarTul saxalxo dResaswaulebze xSirad naxavT erovnul samosSi gamowyobil ymawvilebs, romlebic salamurze ukraven.
The tomb sanctuary of King Antiochus I at MountNemrud was built on a mountaintop in what is nowsoutheastern Turkey in 62 BC. Antiochus I forgedan alliance with Rome during the war betweenRome and the Parthians.
samxreT-aRmosavleT TurqeTSi, mTa nemrudze, Zv.w. 62 wels aRmarTes komagenes mefe antioqos I-is samlocvelo. romaelebma igi aiZules maTi mokavSire gamxdariyo da parTielebis winaaRmdeg ebrZola.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 27
A baker in Georgia uses a modern-daytandir-shaped oven to bake bread. The dough ispressed against the walls of the oven to bake.
saqaTveloSi puris gamosacxobad dRevandeli xabazebi Tones iyeneben. comi Tones kedels ekvreba da ise cxveba.
TheSmithsonianteamcontinuesitsinternationalcollaborativeresearcheffortsinthisarea.PartnersintheregionincludeAzerbaijan’sInstituteofArchaeologyandEthnography,GobustanNationalHistorical-ArtisticPreserveandtheGeorgianNationalMuseum.TheGobustanPreserve,locatedabout40milessouthwestofAzerbaijan’scapitalcityofBaku,wasdeclaredaUNESCOWorldHeritageSitein2007.
Thisbookanditsassociatedwebsite(www.agt.si.edu)areexamplesofthepubliceducationandmuseumcapacity-buildingeffortsassociatedwiththisproject.BP’ssupportparallelsitscommitmenttoincreasingawarenessofbiodiversityandprotectingnaturalhabitats,includinginitiativesthat have mobilized tangible environmental changes throughout the region.
smiTsonis institutis gundi, romelic
moicavs aziis kulturis istoriis
programas, politikisa da analizisa
da mTavar sainformacio samsaxurebs,
agrZelebs regionis kvlevas da
TanamSromlobs gobusTanis arqeologiur
nakrZalTan, azerbaijanis arqeologiisa da
eTnografiis institutsa da saqarTvelos
erovnul muzeumTan. gobusTanis nakrZali,
romelic baqodan samociode kilometriTaa
daSorebuli, 2007 wlidan iuneskos mier
msoflio kulturuli memkvidreobis
Zegladaa gamocxadebuli.
es wigni da masTan dakavSirebuli
vebsaiti (www.agt.si.edu) samSeneblo
proeqtis mimdinareobisas
ganxorcielebuli sazogadoebrivi
ganaTlebisa da samuzeumo SesaZleblobaTa
ganviTarebis samuSaoebis kargi magaliTia.
da misi partniorebi xels uwyoben
biomravalferovnebisa da garemos dacvis
TviTSegnebis amaRlebis mizniT nakisri
valdebulebebis ganxorcielebas, maT
Soris regionSi bunebriv garemoze
mniSvnelovani zemoqmedebis Serbilebis
iniciativebs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor28
Rock art panels at the Gobustan NationalHistorical-Artistic Preserve date from as early asthe Paleolithic period. gobusTanis erovnul istoriul-arqeologiur nakrZalSi daculiKkldis mxatvroba paleoliTis xaniT TariRdeba.
Petroglyphs of a hunter and a possibleshaman are a part of the legacy of theearly past discovered at the GobustanNational Historical-Artistic Preserve. gobusTanis erovnul istoriul-arqeologiur nakrZalSi daculi petroglifebi, romlebzec monadire da Samania gamosaxuli, kulturuli memkvidreobis nawilia.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 29
Rock art panels at the Gobustan NationalHistorical-Artistic Preserve often contain a varietyof elegant figures, sometimes superimposed overeach other.
gobusTanis erovnul istoriul-arqeologiur nakrZalSi daculKkldis mxatvrobaze araerTi figuraa gamosaxuli. zogierTi naxati sxvadasxva drosaa Seqmnili da erTmaneTzea dadebuli.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor30
During Stages 1 and 2 of the project from 2000to 2003, potentially important archaeological siteswere identified through field walks and aerialphotography. This view from the Tsalka district incentral Georgia shows the type of surface clearingthat preceded excavations.
pirveli da meore etapis ganmavlobaSi, 2000-2003 wlebSi dazverviTi samuSaoebisa da aerofotografirebis saSualebiT gamovlinda potenciuri arqeologiuri Zeglebi. es foto walkis raionSi (samxreTi saqarTvelo) niadagis aRebis procesis Semdgom mdgomareobas asaxavs.
ThePipelines
Thepipelineroute—whichrunsthroughwidelydivergentclimatic,geological,andgeographicregionsthathavelongbeenpopulatedbynumerouspeoples—wasnotselectedforitspotential to facilitate archaeological excavations orspurthediscoveryofnewculturalheritageinpreviouslyunexploredregions.Rather,itresultedfrom the practical considerations of bringing a vast newsupplyofcrudeoilandnaturalgasfromtheCaspianSeatoworldmarketsinawaythatbothavoidstheecologicalrisksposedbyhugetankerspassingthroughtheBosporusStraitandprovidesthenewlyindependentpost-SovietstatesoftheCaucasuscontrolovertheexportofAzerbaijan’smostvaluablecommodity.Thepipelinesconstructionhas,nonetheless,giventheregionandtheworldarareopportunitytoincreaseourunderstanding of the past.
milsadenebi
milsadenebis marSruti sxvadasxva xalxiT
dasaxlebulsa da erTmaneTisagan mkveTrad
gansxvavebul klimatur, geografiulsa
da geologiur da regionebze gadis. es
marSruti adre Seuswavlel regionebSi
arqeologiuri gaTxrebis an kulturuli
memkvidreobis axali Zeglebis aRmoCenis
xelSewyobis mizniT ar SerCeula. misi
mizani iyo kaspiis zRvis sabadoebis nedli
navTobisa da bunebrivi airis msoflio
bazrebze gatana, rac maqsimalurad
Seamcirebda rogorc bosforis sruteSi
uzarmazari tankerebis moZraobis Sedegad
gamowveul ekologiur safrTxeebs,
aseve gazrdida kavkasiis postsabWoTa
sivrceSi axladSeqmnili damoukidebeli
saxelmwifoebis kontrols Azerbaijanis
am uZvirfasesi nedleulis eqsportze.
amave dros, milsadenebis mSeneblobam
regionsa da msoflios warsulis ukeTesad
Seswavlis iSviaTi SesaZlebloba misca.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 31
TheBTCpipelinestartsattheSangachalTerminalontheCaspianSeainAzerbaijan,passesthroughtheterritoryofGeorgia,andendsattheCeyhanTerminalontheTurkishcoastoftheMediterranean,fromwhich“Azerilight”crudeoiloftheAzeri-Chirag-DeepWaterGuneshlifieldisdeliveredtointernationalmarkets.ThelengthoftheBTCpipelineis1,768kilometers(1,099miles):443kilometers(275miles)inAzerbaijan,249kilometers(155miles)inGeorgia,and1,076kilometers(669miles)inTurkey.Itsdiametervariesfrom1.07to1.17meters(42to46inches),anditiscurrentlytransportingclosetoonemillionbarrelsofoilperday,withplanstoincreasecapacitytohandleadditionalvolume.
TheSCPtransportsnaturalgasfromtheShahDenizfieldontheCaspianSeatoTurkey.ItfollowstherouteoftheBTCpipelinethroughAzerbaijanandGeorgiaintoTurkey,whereitconnectswiththeTurkishgasdistributionsystem.Thetotallengthofthispipelineis691kilometers(429miles),dividedbetweenAzerbaijanandGeorgiainthesameproportionsastheBTCpipeline,andmeasures1.07meters(42inches)indiameter.
In addition to initial archaeological surveys, theimpacts that the pipeline project would have onlocal communities such as this village locatedon the Kodiana Pass in Georgia, were examined.Preventive measures were taken so as not topermanently disrupt the lives of villagers.
winaswaruli arqeologiuri dazvervebis garda, Seswavlil iqna is SesaZlo zemoqmedebebi, rac milsadenis proeqts adgilobriv mosaxleobaze, mag., saqarTveloSi, kodianis uReltexilze mdebare am sofelze SeeZlo moexdina. amis aRsakveTad miiRes prevenciuli zomebi.
baqo-Tbilisi-jeihanis milsadeni (BTC), azerbaijanSi kaspiis zRvis terminal
sangaCalSi iwyeba, gaivlis saqarTvelos
teritorias da TurqeTis xmelTaSua
zRvis sanapiroze, jeihanis terminalTan
mTavrdeba, saidanac nedli navTobi
saerTaSoriso bazrebs miewodeba.
Mmilsadenis sigrZe 1,768 kilometria;
aqedan 443 kmAazerbaijanis teritoriaze
gadis, 249 km saqarTvelos teritoriaze da
1,076km ki_TurqeTisaze. milis diametri
1,07 metridan 1,17 metramde meryeobs da
yoveldRe masSi TiTqmis 1 milioni bareli
navTobi gaedisneba samomavlod ufro didi
odenobiT navTobis gatanac igegmeba.
samxreTkavkasiuri milsadenis(SCP) saSualebiT kaspiis zRvis Sahdenizis
sabadodan bunebrivi airi TurqeTSi
gaaqvT. saqarTvelosa da azerbaijanis
teritoriaze igi BTC–is paralelurad
miuyveba, xolo TurqeTSi - Turqul
gazgamanawilebel sistemas uerTdeba. am
milsadenis sigrZe 691 kilometria daBTC milsadenis analogiuri proporciiTaa
gayofili azerbaijansa da saqarTvelos
Soris. misi diametric 1,07 metria.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor32
Excavation leader Dr. Goderdzi Narimanishviliand Cultural Heritage Monitor Nino Erkomaishvilidiscuss their strategy at the Saphar Kharaba sitein Georgia.
eqspediciis xelmZRvaneli goderZi narimaniSvili da kulturuli memkvidreobis monitori nino erqomaiSvili ganixilaven safar xarabas samarovanze Casatarebeli samuSaos.
milsadenebis arqeologiuri programa
saerTaSoriso navTobkorporaciebma AGT-isMmilsadenis arqeologiuri programis
farglebSi kulturuli memkvidreobis
dacvis TvalsazrisiT umniSvnelovanesi
valdebulebebi aiRes. am ideis
iniciatorebi is saerTaSoriso finansuri
jgufebi iyo, romlebic mSeneblobas
afinansebdnen da maspinZeli qveynebisa
da BP-isaTvis qmnidnen garemosdacviT da
kulturuli memkvidreobis standartebs.
proeqti samive qveyanaSi kidev ramdenime
wels gastans da mis farglebSi
muSaoba ekologiuri da arqeologiuri
mimarTulebiTac gagrZeldeba.
TheAGTPipelinesArchaeologyProgram
TheAGT(Azerbaijan,GeorgiaandTurkey)PipelinesArchaeologyProgramrepresentsoneofthemostsignificantcommitmentstoculturalheritageevermadebyaninternationalpipelineproject.Itwasinitiatedasaresultoftherequirementsoftheinternationalfinancialcommunitythatfinancedthepipelines,guidelinesofthehostcountries,andBP’sinternalstandardsforenvironmentalandculturalprotection.Theprojectwillcontinueoverthenextseveralyearsthrough the implementation of archaeological and ecological projects in the three host countries.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 33
In western Azerbaijan, a group of side boomstravel along the pipeline corridor.
dasavleTi zerbaijani. mZime teqnika milsadenebis dedefanSi.
An archaeologist from Azerbaijan’s Institute ofArchaeology and Ethnography records one of theearliest kurgans (burial sites) in the region at anexcavation site near the village of Soyuqbulaq.
azerbaijanis Aarqeologiisa da eTnografiis institutis arqeologi afiqsirebs uZveles yorRans sof.soiuqbulaqTan.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor34
SiteLocations,Excavation, andAnalysis
Incoordinationwithnationalculturalheritageauthorities,astagedprogramofarchaeologicalresearch and excavation was developed in each ofthehostcountriesalongthepipelines.Thefour initial stages occurred before and during the pipelineconstruction.Overthecourseofthefirstfourstages,dozensofarchaeologicalsiteswerefound and sampled.
• Baselinesurveys,staffedinpartwithlocalexperts,comprisedStage1.Theresultsofthesesurveysledtoalterationoftheproposedpipelineroute,aspartofanoverallstrategytoworkaroundareasofenvironmentalandculturalsensitivity.
• Stage2beganoncetheroutewasdeterminedandthefinanciallendersapprovedit.Thisstage involved testing selected sites through limitedexcavationstoidentifyculturalheritageresourcesofsufficientsignificancetowarrantavoidanceormitigationinitiatives,such as restricting construction areas or using protective measures such as fencing.
• Stage3,whichalsobeganbeforetheAGTpipelineconstructionbegan,involvedafirstroundofexcavations.TheywereplannedwellinadvancewithBP’snationalpartnerorganizations so as to have clear research designs and protocols in place to maximize the data collected. Several methods of record keepingwereemployedduringthisstage,includingdrawings,photographs,andwrittendocumentation.
Zeglebis mdebareoba, gaTxrebi da analiziP
maspinZeli qveynebis kulturuli
memkvidreobis samsaxurebTan erTad
BP-m da misma partniorebma etapobrivi programa SeimuSaves. is moicavda, rogorc
mSeneblobis wina, ise misi mimdinareobisas
milsadenebis arealSi aRmoCenili
arqeologiuri Zeglebis kvlevisa da
gaTxrebis gegmas. igi oTx samuSao etapad
iyo dayofili. misi ganxorcielebisas
mravali aTeuli arqeologiuri Zegli
gamovlinda.
• sabazo kvlevebma, romlebic
adgilobrivma eqspertebma Caatares,
gamokveTa pirveli etapis amocanebi.
Sedegebma cxadyo, rom dagegmil
marSrutSi garkveuli cvlilebebis
Setana iyo aucilebeli, raTa garemosa
da kulturis Zeglebs safrTxe ar
Seqmnoda.
• me-2 etapi marSrutis sabolood
dadgenisa da damfinanseblebis mier
misi damtkicebis Semdeg daiwyo. igi
moicavda SerCeul ubnebze mcire
masStabis dazverviTi gaTxrebis
Catarebas, raTa dadasturebuliyo
mniSvnelovani kulturuli
memkvidreobis Zeglebis arseboba
da, amavdroulad, gansazRvruliyo
samSeneblo teritoriebis SezRudvisa
da dacvis zomebi.
• me-3 etapi, romelic aseve samSeneblo
samuSaoebis dawyebamde Catarda,
moicavda pirvelad gaTxrebs. es
gaTxrebi kompaniam adgilobriv
partnior organizaciebTan erTad
dagegma, raTa miRebul monacemebze
dayrdnobiT SemuSavebuliyo momavali
gaTxrebis realuri gegma. am etapze
gamoyenebul iqna dafiqsirebis
sxvadasxva meTodi, kerZod; Canaxatebi,
fotosuraTebi da werilobiTi wyaroebi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 35
This frieze in the Old City in Baku capturesimages from the rock art in the Gobustan NationalHistorical-Artistic Preserve.
Zvel baqoSi daculi es frizi gobusTanis erovnuli nakrZalidanaa.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor36
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 37
The pipeline construction activities.
milsadenis mSenebloba.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor38
•Stage4involvedexcavationsofnewsitesfound during the actual construction process. Avitaltaskwasthedevelopmentofpolicyandproceduresfordealingwithpreviouslyunknownarchaeologicalsitesfoundafterconstructioncommenced.These“latefinds,”generallyconsistingofscatteringsofartifacts,alsoyieldeduniqueandimportantdiscoveries.Inmanycases,BP,inconsultationwithnationalregulatorybodies,developedmeasurestoavoidorabatedamagetotheselatefinds.Mitigationusuallyinvolvedrestrictingimpactsthrough the use of narrower construction zones combined with archaeological excavation.
• me-4 etapi iTvaliswinebda TviT
samSeneblo procesis dros aRmoCenili
arqeologiuri Zeglebis gaTxras.
umniSvnelovanesi amocana iyo am ucnobi
Zeglebis mimarT swori strategiisa
da meTodikis SemuSaveba. es “gviani
aRmoCenebi” mniSvnelovan monapovrad
SeiZleba CaiTvalos. umetes SemTxvevebSi,
kompaniis kulturuli memkvidreobis
samsaxuri iseT RonisZiebebs mimarTavda,
romlis Sedegad Zeglis dazianeba
minimumamde iqneboda dayvanili. amisTvis
ki samSeneblo zonis areali mcireboda
da mSeneblobis paralelurad,
arqeologiuri gaTxrebi tardeboda.
A Muslim tombstone in Azerbaijan has beenstanding since the middle ages.
es muslimuri saflavis qva azerbaijanSi Sua saukuneebisaa.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 39
Mud flows from volcanoes in Azerbaijan dating backto ancient times indicate geothermal activity in theCaspian region.
vulkanuriLlavis gaqvavebuli nakadi Soreul warsulSiAazerbaijanis teritoriasa da kaspiis zRvis sanapiroze geoTermul aqtivobaze miuTiTebs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor40
Uponcompletionoftheexcavationefforts,archaeological teams in the three countries turned theirattentiontoStage5,whichentailedthepreparation of technical reports and monographs pertainingtotheexcavations.“Capacity-building”studies(describedinmoredetailinChapter4)focused on the treatment and preservation of artifactsrecoveredduringtheproject.Thisworkwasfollowedbythepreparationofgeneralpublicoutreachmaterials,includingthisbook,museumexhibits and a website that chronicles aspects of the archaeologicalprojectit*elf,aswellasthelivesandcultures of the ancient inhabitants of the region who createdtheartifacts.Thisstagewillcontinueon,expandingwhatisknownoftheregion’shistory:Thepipelineproject’sexploration,interpretation,andstewardshipisnotyetfinished,justastheregion’shumanstorycontinuestounfold.
The Davit Gareji Monastery in East Georgia was founded in the 6th century by Saint Davit(David), who once lived in a cave at this location.The complex grew over the centuries following hisdeath and remains in use today.
daviT garejis samonastro kompleqsi wm. daviT garejelma aRmosavleT saqarTveloSi VI saukuneSi daarsa. igi am adgilas erT-erT gamoqvabulSi cxovrobda. es kompleqsi misi gardacvalebis Semdegac farTovdeboda da dResac moqmedi monasteria.
gaTxriTi samuSaoebis damTavrebis Semdeg
samive qveynis arqeologiurma jgufebma
mTeli yuradReba me-5 etapze gaamaxviles,
momzadebuliyo teqnikuri angariSebi
da monografiebi da dadgeniliyo
artefaqtebis Senaxvis pirobebi. am
samuSaos mohyveboda mopovebuli masalis
sazogadoebis samsjavroze gamotana.
amisaTvis ki unda Seqmniliyo specialuri
vebgverdi da mowyobiliyo rogorc
samuzeumo, aseve moZravi gamofenebi,
sadac aisaxeboda arqeologiuri
proeqtis sxvadasxva aspeqti da aseve
am artefaqtebis Semqmneli uZvelesi
mosaxleobis sulieri da materialuri
kultura. es etapi amJamadac grZeldeba da
emsaxureba regionis istoriis Seswavlas.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 41
This statue in the heart of Baku commemoratesNizami Gyanjavi the great epic poet.
baqos centrSi mdebare es Zegli didi poetis, nizami ganjelis sapativcemodaa aRmarTuli.
The Turkish site Ziyaretsuyu, as seen from atop a nearby hill. When archaeologically significant sites such as this one were discovered, the pipeline route was diverted to minimize impacts on the sites.
Turquli arqeologiuri Zeglis, ziareTsuis xedi axlomdebare mTidan. aseTi mniSvnelovani arqeologiuri Zeglis aRmoCenisas kompania cdilobda milsadenis marSruti Seecvala, raTa Zegls safrTxe ar damuqreboda.
A portion of the 12th century AD citadel wallsurrounding the storied Ichari Shahar, or “InnerCity,” is preserved within Baku, Azerbaijan’s capital. UNESCO listed the Ichari Shahar as aWorld Heritage site in 2000. azerbaijanis Tanamedrove dedaqalaqSi, baqoSi dRemde SemorCenilia XII saukunis galavani, romelic gars ertymis Zvel qalaqs (`iCari Sahars”). iuneskom igi 2000 wels msoflio kulturuli memkvidreobis Zeglad aRiara.
The inspiring Jvari Church sits atop a ridgeoverlooking Mtskheta, the ancient capital ofGeorgia; the remains of the timeworn town aredated earlier than 1000 BC.
jvris monasteri, romelic maRal goraze dgas, saqarTvelos Zvel dedaqalaqs, mcxeTas gadahyurebs.
The lavish Topkapi Palace complex in Istanbul,Turkey, was the primary residence of Ottomansultans from 1465 until the mid-19th century.
1465 wlidan XIX saukunis Suaxanebamde Tofqafis mdidruli sasaxle stambulSi otomani sulTnebis rezidencia iyo.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor48
Chapter 2
Cultural history at the Crossroads
the construction of the BtC and SCp pipelines reinvigorated the region’s historic role as a crossroads of world trade.
archaeological work undertaken as a part of the aGt pipelines archaeology program has contributed greatly to understanding the individual cultures and histories of the host nations, and has documented their long record of interconnectedness over the past four millennia. the recent rebuilding of social and economic relationships in the region is one reoccurrence in this long history of connections. 1
baqo-Tbilisi-jeihanisa da
baqo-Tbilisi-erzerumis
milsadenebis mSeneblobam
regions misi uZvelesi,
savaWro gzajvaredinis funqcia
daubruna. arqeologiurma
samuSaoebma, romlebic azerbaijani-
saqarTvelo-TurqeTis milsadenebis
arqeologiuri programis farglebSi
ganxorcielda, maspinZeli qveynebis
kulturisa da istoriis Seswavlis
saqmeSi mniSvnelovani wvlili
Seitana, amasTan kidev erTxel
daadastura, rom es regioni bolo
oTxi aTaswleulis ganmavlobaSi
dasavleTisa da aRmosavleTis
urTierTgadakveTisa da Serwymis
adgili iyo. regionSi socialuri
da kulturuli kavSirebis
bolodroindeli gamococxleba kidev
erTxel miuTiTebs am istoriul
kavSirebze.
Tavi 2
kulturis istoria gzajvaredinze
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 49
This mosaic, created by the Azerbaijani artistHuseyn Hagverdi, depicts the unifying nature of thepipeline that links Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey,including the resultant economic and culturalbenefits. Each country is represented by imagesof historical monuments located in their respectivecapitals. The mosaic is located at the CaspianEnegry Centre at the Sangachal oil and gasterminal, 55km from Baku.
azerbaijaneli mxatvris, husein hagverdis mier Seqmnili es mozaika azerbaijanis, saqarTvelosa da TurqeTis kulturisa da ekonomikis damakavSirebeli milsadenis mniSvnelobas asaxavs. TiToeuli qveyana warmodgenilia maT dedaqalaqebSi daculi istoriuli ZeglebiT. mozaika baqodan 55 km-Si, sangaCalis terminalis teritoriazea ganTavsebuli.
this chapter presents a brief narrative of each country’s cultural history, with selected examples of how the findings from along the pipelines’ route have increased knowledge of them. the pipelines corridor covers only a small percentage of the total land area of the three nations, and the findings from the excavations are only a part of the data from which understanding of the past derives. Nonetheless the results of the aGt pipelines archaeological program have expanded what is known about almost every time period in the history of the countries. the following chapter discusses the archaeological sites within each of the countries.
am TavSi mokled aris gadmocemuli
TiToeuli qveynis kulturis istoria
da SerCeul magaliTebze dayrdnobiT
naCvenebi, Tu rogor Seuwyo xeli
mSeneblobisas aRmoCenilma arqeologiurma
masalam arsebuli codnis gaRrmavebas.
milsadenebis derefani sami qveynis
teritoriis mxolod mcire nawilze
gadis da gaTxrebis Sedegad mopovebuli
masalac, ra Tqma unda, mxolod mciredi
nawilia im didi masalisa, romlebic Cven
warsulis kvlevaSi gvexmareba. miuxedavad
amisa, azerbaijani-saqarTvelo-TurqeTis
milsadenebis arqeologiurma programam
xeli Seuwyo am qveynebis istoriuli
warsulis TiTqmis yvela periodis Sesaxeb
dagrovili codnis gaRrmavebas. Semdeg
TavSi aRwerilia am programis dros
Seswavlili arqeologiuri Zeglebi. 1
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor50
Azerbaijan by Najaf Museyibli 2
Paleolithic/Epipaleolithic Period (2 million years BC – circa 8000 years BC) archaeological excavations at azikh cave in the Garabagh region of Azerbaijan demonstrate that ancient people populated this territory circa 2 million years ago. Discovered within the cave was a mandible fragment belonging to an azikhantrop human that dates to 350,000-400,000 years ago in addition to one of the world’s oldest discoveries: the remains of a fireplace dating to 700,000 years ago. the Middle paleolithic period, dating to approximately 150,000 years ago to 35,000-40,000 years ago, was the era of the Neanderthals. rich artifact finds that were discovered in Azikh cave and neighboring Taghlar cave reflect the daily lifestyles and technological progresses (such as stone tool development) fostered by Middle paleolithic people. Modern humans continually developed new technologies as they expanded geographically. presently, modern human origin scholarship focuses on cave and shelter sites.
the Upper (Late) paleolithic period in the Caucasian and anatolia regions commenced circa 35,000-40,000 years ago and progressed until the 14th millennium BC. this was followed by the Mesolithic-epipaleolithic period, which spanned from the 13th through the 8th millenniums BC. technology continued to improve in the form of more complicated stone tools and the creation of some of the first examples of fine art. The germs of later forms of production developed during the Mesolithic period. 3
azerbaijani (avtori najaf museibli 2)
paleoliTi da epipaleoliTi (2 milioni – Zv.w. 8000)
azerbaijanSi,Aazixis gamoqvabulSi
Catarebulma arqeologiurma gaTxrebma
gamoavlina, rom es mxare 2 milioni wlis
winaT iyo dasaxlebuli. gamoqvabulSi
aRmoCenili qveda ybis Zvali azixanTrops
miekuTvneba, romelic 350,000-400,000
wlis winandeli droiT TariRdeba.
aqvea 700 000 wliT daTariRebuli,
msoflioSi erT erTi uadresi kera.
Sua paleoliTi (150,000-40,000/35,000 ww)
neandertaleli adamianis arsebobis
periodia. azixisa da mis mezoblad
mdebare TaRlaris gamoqvabulebSi
Catarebulma arqeologiurma gaTxrebma
informacia mogvawoda imdroindeli
adamianis cxovrebis wesisa da qvis
iaraRis teqnologiuri ganviTarebis
Sesaxeb. amJamad, Tanamedrove mecniereba
adamianis warmoSobis Sesaxeb mimarTulia
mRvimeebisa da Ria sadgomebis
Seswavlisaken.
zeda paleoliTi kavkasiasa da anatoliaSi
35,000-40,000 wlis winaT daiwyo da Zv.w. XIV
aTaswleulamde gagrZelda. mas mosdevs
mezoliTi (XIII-VIII aTaswleulebi).
daixvewa qvis iaraRi da ganviTarda
xelovnebac. 3
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 51
Upper paleolithic and Mesolithic period-related sites have been discovered in the Caucasus, such as that located on the Gobustan reserve in Azerbaijan. Most notably, Gobustan features rock art inscriptions that reflect the lifestyle of Upper paleolithic and Mesolithic people in addition to buried archaeological material. Gobustan became especially important to Azerbaijan’s own history when archaeologists discovered Mesolithic burials. anthropological analysis has shown that the skull traits of humans found in these burials are linked to today’s Azerbaijani population. 4
Neolithic Period (ca. 7000 – 4500 BC), Eneolithic/Chalcolithic Period (ca. 4500 – 3500 BC), and Early Bronze Age (ca. 3500 – 2200 BC) the transition from the hunting-and-gathering societies of the paleolithic era to farming-based communities—a shift commonly known as the Neolithic revolution—culminated in the Neolithic age. One hallmark of the Neolithic revolution was the development of farming and cattle-breeding strategies based on sedentary societies. a new cultural pattern developed in the Kura basin of western Azerbaijan and southeastern Georgia known as the Shumatapa culture. examples of this culture were found during excavations in the aGt pipelines corridor.
the emergence of early copper metallurgy alongside traditional stone tools marked the subsequent period, known as the eneolithic or Chalcolithic age. During this age, much of western asia saw the expansion of isolated villages into regional trade systems, a hallmark of incipient civilizations.
zeda paleoliTisa da mezoliTuri
xanis Zeglebi kavkasiaSicaa aRmoCenili:
magaliTad, azerbaijanSi, gobusTaniSi.
aRsaniSnavia gobusTanis gamosaxulebebi,
romlebic arqeologiur masalasTan
erTad imdroindeli adamianebis yofaze
mogviTxrobs. gobusTanSi arqeologebma
mezoliTur samarxebs miakvlies.
anTropologiurma kvlevebma aCvena, rom
micvalebulebis Tavis qalebiAazerbaijanis
dRevandel mosaxleobas ukavSirdeba. 4
neoliTi (Zv.w. 7000 – 4500ww.), eneoliTi (Zv.w. 4500 – 3500ww) da adre brinjaos xana (Zv.w. 3500 – 2200ww)
paleoliTuri samonadireo-Semgrovebluri
meurneoba TandaTanobiT samiwaTmoqmedo-
mesaqonle, mwarmoeblurma meurneobam
Secvala, rac neoliTuri revoluciis
saxeliTaa cnobili. dasavleT
azerbaijansa da aRmosavleT
saqarTveloSi am droisaTvis Sulaver-
SomuTefes adresamiwaTmoqmedo kultura
Camoyalibda. milsadenebis arealis
arqeologiuri Seswavlisas ramdenime
Zegli aRmoCnda, romlebic am kulturas
miekuTvneba.
qvis iaraRis warmoebasTan erTad
eneoliTur xanaSi adamianma spilenZis
damuSaveba daiwyo. am droisaTvis
dasavleT aziaSi daiwyo mcire,
izolirebuli dasaxlebebis gafarToeba
da maTi regionalur savaWro sistemaSi
CarTva, rac civilizaciis warmoSobas
moaswavebda. am istoriul periods
eneoliTs an qalkoliTis periods
uwodeben. XX saukunis 80-ian wlebSi,
azerbaijanSi, leilaTefeze Catarebulma
arqeologiurma gaTxrebma eneoliTuri
xanis axali monacemebi gamoamzeura.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor52
This petroglyth from the Gobustan National Historical-Artistic Preserve depicts several human figures, and possibly a representation of a boat.
es petroglifi gobusTanis xelovnebisa da istoriis erovnuli nakrZalidan warmogvidgens ramdenime adamianisa da navis gamosaxulebas.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 53
aRmoCnda, rom arqiteqturuli detalebi,
liTonis warmoeba, bavSvTa samarxebi
da keramikuli morgvis gamoyeneba am
Zegls mniSvnelovnad ganasxvavebda
samxreT kavkasiis Tanadrouli
Zeglebisagan. am aRmoCenam safuZveli
daudo leilaTefes kulturis Seswavlas.
leilaTefes kultura ukavSirdeba
Crdilo mesopotamiur ubeidisa da
uruqis kulturebs, romlebic Zv.w.
IV aTaswleulis pirveli naxevriT
TariRdeba. irkveva, rom eneoliTis xanaSi,
leilaTefeze mesopotamiidan samxreT
kavkasiaSi wamosuli tomebi dasaxlebulan.
dasavleT azerbaijanSi energoderefnis
mSeneblobisas leilaTefes kulturis
araerTi saintereso Zegli gamoavlina,
ramac kavkasiis arqeologiis sakiTxebis
kritikulad gaazrebas Seuwyo xeli
(buiuq qaSiqis, foilo II-sa da agilidaras
namosaxlarebi, soiuqbulaqis samarxebi).
maTi monacemebi axal masalas gvawvdis
kavkasiisa da axlo aRmosavleTis
eTnikuri, ekonomikuri da kulturuli
urTierTobebis Sesaxeb da evropeli,
rusi da qarTveli specialistebis
dainteresebas iwvevs. maikopis kulturisa
da mesopotamiuri Zeglebis savaraudo
urTierTdamokidebulebis Sesaxeb azrebi
adrec gamoTqmula, magram aRniSnuli
Zeglebis Seswavlam es mosazrebebi
daadastura.
archaeological excavations in the early 1980s at the old Leylatapa residential area in the Garadagh region of Azerbaijan revealed novel traces of the eneolithic period. It was later discovered that the architectural findings (ironware, infant graves in clay pots, earthenware prepared using potter’s wheel and other features) significantly differ from the archaeological complexes of the same period in the South Caucasus. From these findings, a new archaeological culture (the Leylatapa) was discovered. research indicates that this culture was genetically connected with the Ubeid and Uruk cultures, which were archaeological complexes in Northern Mesopotamia that date to the first half of the 4th millennium BC. It has been determined that the Leylatapa residential area was built by ancient tribes migrating from the Northern Mesopotamia to the South Caucasus during the eneolithic period.
In western Azerbaijan, a number of Leylatapa-related archaeological sites were uncovered within the BtC and SCp pipelines corridor, which created tremendous opportunities for critical scientific research concerned with archaeology in the Caucasus. Relevant sites include the Boyuk Kasik (438km), Poylu II (408.8km), Agılıdara (358km) settlement sites and the Soyuqbulaq burial mounds (432km). these monuments are critical for the investigation of ethnic, economic and cultural relationships within the Caucasus and Middle east, which has resulted in scientists from europe, russia and Georgia all showing immense interest in these sites. For example, a relationship between the North Caucasian Maykop sites and those of Mesopotamia was suspected by the scientific community for many years, however it wasn’t until archaeological excavations were conducted at the above-mentioned sites that a link was confirmed.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor54
The Kura-Araxes civilization of the Early Bronze age replaced the eneolithic period in the middle of the 4th millennium BC in the southern Caucasus. the main features of this society were the production of bronze, black, and dark gray glazed pots with hemispherical handles, the rapid development of a cattle-breeding economy, and the spread of mound-type graves. The Kura-Araxes culture extended from the South Caucasus to what is now the republic of Dagestan to the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea. It came to an end in the third quarter of the 3rd millennium BC.
three kurgan (burial mound) monuments referring to the Kura-Araxes culture have been discovered and excavated in the western side of Shamkirchai river along the pipeline route on 332-333 km in Azerbaijan. Excavation of these kurgans has provided valuable information about the burial traditions, economic and cultural relations of the early Bronze age population of the region.
Zv.w. IV aTaswleulis Sua xanebSi
samxreT kavkasiis eneoliTuri
kulturaAadrebrinjaos mtkvar-araqsulma
kulturam Secvala, romlisaTvis
damaxasiaTebelia brinjaos warmoeba,
Tixis Savi da ruxi feris naprialebi
keramika, mesaqonleobis ganviTareba
da gorasamarxebis gavrceleba. igi
vrceldeboda daRestnidan da samxreT
kavkasiis aRmosavleTi nawilidan
xmelTaSua zRvis aRmosavleT sanapiromde.
misi dasasruli Zv.w. III aTaswleulis
mesame meoTxedSi ivaraudeba.
azerbaijanSi, md. SamqirCais dasavleT
napirze, milsadenis gaswvriv sami mtkvar-
araqsuli yorRani gaiTxara. maTma
Seswavlam mniSvnelovani informacia
mogvawoda regionis adrebrinjaos xanis
mosaxleobaze.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 55
Smaller finds from Boyuk Kasik in Azerbaijan include the clay human and animal figurines shown above.
buiuq qaSiqis arqeologiuri monapovarSi gvxvdeba Tixis anTropomorfuli da zoomorfuli figurebi.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor56
Middle Bronze Age (ca. 2200 – 1500 BC), Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age. (ca. 1500 – 500 BC)
During the Middle Bronze age, an early urban culture appeared in azerbaijan marked by glazed pottery. Similar urban residential areas were discovered and excavated in the Nakhchivan and Garabagh regions. also during this period the Uzarliktapa and tazakand archaeological cultures were wide spread throughout azerbaijan. It was also a time when local populations strengthened their economic and cultural ties with Middle eastern civilizations. Several graves were found in Ganja-Gazakh region before the construction of the pipelines, specifically graves were discovered at the Babadervish site in the Gazakh region and near the Garajamirli village in the Shamkir region. the most extensive archaeological excavations conducted along the pipelines route were those settlements that date to the Late Bronze and early Iron ages. a sample of sites that are located in the Ganja-Gazakh region, Garabagh region, southeastern Georgia and area northeast of present-day armenia are associated with the Khojali-Gadabay culture dating to the second half of the 2nd millennium and beginning of the 1st millennium BC. the Borsunlu burial mound (272km) in the Goranboy region, the Zayamchai necropolis (365km) in the Shamkir region, the Tovuzchai necropolis (378km) in the Tovuz region, and the hasansu necropolis (398.8km) in the agstafa region excavated within the pipeline corridor all reflect this culture.
Suabrinjaos xana (Zv.w. 2200 – 1500ww.), gvianbrinjaos xana (Zv.w. 1500 – 1200ww.), rkinis xana (Zv.w. 1200 – 500ww.)
Sua brinjaos xanaSiAazerbaijanis
teritoriaze adreurbanuli kultura
yalibdeba. urbanuli dasaxlebebi
yarabaxisa da naxWevanis teritoriazea
Seswavlili. am dros azerbaijanSi
uzalrikTefesa da tazakentis
kulturebi iyo gavrcelebuli.
adgilobriv mosaxleobas am droisaTvis
gacxovelebuli kulturul-ekonomikuri
urTierTobebi qonda axlo aRmosavleTis
civilizaciebTan. am periodis ramdenime
samarxi milsadenis mSeneblobamdec iyo
Seswavlili yarajamirlisa (yazaxis
raioni)da babaderviSis samarovnebze
(Samqoris raioni). milsadenebis
teritoriaze yvelaze meti gvianbrinjaosa
da adrerkinis xanis Zegli aRmoCnda. Zv.w.
II aTaswelulis dasasrulsa da Zv.w I
aTaswleulis dasawyisSi azerbaijanis
ganja-yazaxisa da yarabaxis raionebSi,
agreTve mis mosazRvre teritoriebze
saqarTvelosa da somxeTSi gavrcelebuli
iyo xojali-gebadeis kultura. borsunlus
yorRani goranbois raionSi, ziamCais
(Samqoris raioni), TovuzCais (Tovuzis
raioni) da hasansus (aRstafis raioni)
samarovnebi swored am kulturas
miekuTvneba.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 57
adre Suasaukuneebis, marTkuTxa, ornamentirebuli muslimuri saflavis qvebi aRmoCnda samSeneblo samuSaoebisas da arqeologiuri gaTxrebisas Zveli baqos samxreT-dasavleT nawilSi.
Rectangular Muslim gravestones with ornaments ascribed to the early medieval times discovered during the construction and archaeological excavations on the south-western part of Icheri Sheher (Old city) in Baku.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor58
Overall, more than 200 grave monuments related to the Upper Bronze-early Iron age have been excavated in the pipeline corridor. the deceased were positioned on their right or left sides with their arms and legs folded. they typically adorn trinkets, weapons, earthenware among other items displayed around the deceased’s body. the excavation of these rich monuments has provided ample material for investigating the ancient funeral traditions of the region. also of note during this time are the ancient kingdoms of Manna (azerbaijan) and Urartu (eastern anatolia), which were contemporaries of the Khojali-Gadabay culture during the early Iron age.
milsadenebis arqeologiuri programisas,
sxvadasxva Zeglze gvianbrinjaosa da
adrerkinis xanis orasze meti samarxi
gaiTxara. samarxTa umravlesobaSi,
gverdze, kidurebmokecilad dakrZaluli
micvalebulebis garSemo aRmoCnda
keramikuli nawarmi, iaraRi da samkauli. aq
mopovebuli nivTebi dakrZalvis ritualis
kvlevisaTvis mniSvnelovan masalas
gvawvdis. aRsaniSnavia, rom adrerkinis
xanaSi, xojali-gadabais kulturis
paralelurad manasa (azerbaijanSi)
da urartus (aRmosavleT anatoliaSi)
samefoebi arsebobda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 59
Pots from the Hasansu site in Azerbaijan werecoated with black polish, or burnished (polishedto a shiny surface) during production. The whitepaint on this 17th-16th century BC pot, which is26 centimeters wide and 24 centimeters tall, formsa striking pattern that, according to NajafMüseyibli, symbolizes the sun. Ancient peoplesoften considered the sun as a source of fertilityand used its image to decorate house wares andjewelry. The pot’s rich color and decoration, and theabsence of traces of fire on its bottom, indicate thatit was used to serve guests on special occasions.
hasansus yorRanis keramika Savad gamomwvari da naprialebia. XVII – XVI saukunis WurWelze (sigane 26 sm., simaRle 24 sm.) TeTri saRebaviT datanili ornamenti mzis simbolos warmoadgens. uZveles xalxebs miaCndaT, rom mze nayofierebis wyaroa da sxvadasxva nivTebs xSirad amkobdnen misi gamosaxulebebiT. WurWlis mdidari ferebi da dekori, agreTve cecxlis kvalis ararseboba imaze migvaniSnebs, rom am nivTs gansakuTrebuli SemTxvevebisaTvis iyenebdnen.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor60
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 61
This handsome ceramic pot, which is 28.5 centimeters high and 31 centimeters wide, was found in the Tovuzchai necropolis in the Tovuz region of Azerbaijan in 2004. It dates from the 12th-11th centuries BC. A highly stylized zoomorphic ornament on its upper side represents either a snake or a horse. Many scholars in the Caucasus today interpret zoomorphic images such as these to be linked to magic or fertility rituals or decorations.
Zv. w. XII-XI saukuneebis es WurWeli (simaRle - 28,5 sm, diametri - 31 sm.) TovuzCais samarovanze aRmoCnda. mis zeda nawilze datanilia stilizebuli, zoomorfuli ornamenti romelic gvels an cxens gamosaxavs. aseTi zoomorfuli gamosaxulebebi, savaraudod, nayofierebis magiur ritualTan unda iyos dakavSirebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor62
This single strand of alluring carnelian beads foundat the Zayamchai necropolis in the Shamkir districtof Azerbaijan in 2003, dates from the Late BronzeAge to the Early Iron Age. Beads like these werepainstakingly crafted by hand. Najaf Müseyiblisuggests that they were not only worn for theirbeauty, but also sometimes for the magical andspiritual protection they were thought to provide the wearer, or for their curative value.
ziamCais samarovanze 2003 wels aRmoCenili sardionis mZivebi gvianbrinjao - adrerkinis xaniT TariRdeba. mZivebi xeliT, guldasmiTaa damuSavebuli. doqtor najaf museiblis azriT, am lamaz mZivebs, romlebic samkaulad gamoiyeneboda, magiuri daniSnulebac hqonda da samkurnalo Tvisebebsac miawerdnen.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 63
This symmetrical bronze pendant, found at the Zayamchai archaeological site in the Shamkir district of Azerbaijan in 2003, dates from the 13th-12th centuries BC, the Bronze Age. It has a diameter of 10.5 centimeters. The design may symbolize the sun according to scholars in the Caucasus, a symbol of warmth and fecundity.
ziamCais samarovanze 2003 wels aRmoCenili da Zv. w. XIII-XII saukuneebiT daTariRebuli brinjaos, simetriuli sakidi 10,5 santimetris diametrisaa. igi, savaraudod, mzis – siTbosa da nayofierebis simboloa.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor64
Early Antique (Hellenistic) Period (ca. 500 – 200 BC) Several of the sites along the pipeline route in Azerbaijan date from what archaeologists call the early antique period. During this period, Azerbaijan had close economic-trading and cultural-political relations with the Near east and Greco-roman world. the archaeological excavations conducted inform us of the high level of these relations. During this period, the kingdoms of Caucasian albania and Iberia (Kartli) occupied the territories of present-day Azerbaijan and Georgia, respectively. To the west and north lived the Scythians, Sarmatians, and inhabitants of the Kingdom of Colchis. the Medes, assyrian, and neo-Babylonian empires located to the south and southwest were eventually replaced by the persian empire.
adreantikuri xana (Zv.w. 400 – 200ww.)
azerbaijanSi, milsadenebis arealSi
Seswavlili Zeglebis erTi nawils
arqeologebi adreantikuri xaniT
aTariReben. Aam drois azerbaijans axlo
politikur-ekonomikuri urTierTobebi
qonda axlo aRmosavleTTan da berZnul-
romaul samyarosTan, rac arqeologiuri
gaTxrebiTac dasturdeba.Aazerbaijanisa
da aRmosavleT saqarTvelos teritoriaze
am droisaTvis albanelebi da iberebi
saxlobdnen, romlebsac dasavleTidan
kolxeTis samefo, CrdiloeTidan skviTebi
da sarmatebi emezoblebodnen, samxreTiT -
asureTis, midiisa da babilonis samefoebi
am droisaTvis iranis aqemenidurma
imperiam Caanacvla.
Excavations near the Girag Kasaman sites (called Girag Kasaman II) revealed several burials from the Antique Period, which in Azerbaijan is considered to span from the 4th century BC to the 7th century AD. The grave offerings included a variety of pottery vessels.
girag qasaman II ze Catarebulma gaTxrebmaantikuri xanis (azerbaijanSi Zv.w. IV – ax.w VIIss). ramdenime samarxi gamoavlina. Samarxebi mravalferovan masalas, maT Soriskeramikas Seicavda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 65
Albanian alphabet, consisting of 52 letters was created in the 5th century.
albanuri anbani V saukuneSi Seiqmna da 52 asos Seicavda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor66
Cyrus the Great, King of Persia, defeated the Medes in 553 BC. the persian achaemenid empire, which began with Cyrus, encompassed a vast area from afghanistan to thrace (in what is today Bulgaria and northern Greece). this empire established the critical role the persians played in the historical development of southwest asia and influenced all the countries of the South Caucasus and anatolia.
Following his victory over Darius achaemenid of Persia at the Battle of Gaugamela in 331 BC, Macedonian King Alexander the Great occupied Media, an event that contributed to the spread of Greek culture in the South Caucasus. After alexander’s death in 323 BC, his empire was divided among several successors. eastern anatolia and portions of the South Caucasus (southern portions of Caucasian albania and Caucasian Iberia) went to Seleucus (Salavki), a Macedonian general who established the Seleucid dynasty, which continued the hellenization of the region and strengthened connections with the Mediterranean world.
the expansion of roman power into the region during the last century BC, and the incorporation of much of it into the roman empire during the first three centuries AD, reinforced the Mediterranean influences in the region. To establish its authority, rome initially dispatched some of its most famous generals, such as Lucullus, pompey, to counter the burgeoning power of the parthians from south and east of the Caspian, and later kept legions stationed in the area to consolidate its control. the stability provided by roman authority helped strengthen economic and social connections in the region.
iranis mefe kiros didma Zv.w. 553
wels midielebi daamarcxa da Seqmna
aqemeniduri imperia, romelic moicavda
uzarmazar teritorias avRaneTidan
Trakiamde (Tanamedrove bulgareTi
da Crdilo saberZneTi).Aam sparsulma
imperiam uzarmazari roli iTamaSa axlo
aRmosavleTis ganviTarebaSi da didi
gavlena moaxdina kavkasiisa da antoliis
saxelmwifoebze.
331 wels aleqsandre makedonelma
gavgamelas brZolaSi iranis mefe
dariosi daamarcxa da midia daikava,
ramac kavkasiaSi berZnuli kulturis
gavrcelebas Seuwyo xeli. aleqsandrem
Camoayaliba axali - elinistur-sparsuli
aristokratia, romlis saSualebiT unda
emarTa uzarmazari imperia - Sua azias,
iransa da indoeTsac rom moicavda.
323 wels, aleqsandres gardacvalebis
Semdeg imperia misma TanamebrZolebma
dainawiles. aRmosavleTi Aanatolia da
kavkasiis nawili ergo makedonel general
selevkoss, romelmac safuZveli daudo
selevkidebis dinastias, ganagrZo regionis
elinizacia da xmelTaSuazRvispireTTan
ganamtkica urTierToba.
Zv.w. dasasrulisaTvis regionSi romis
eqspansia daiwyo. ax.w I_III saukuneebSi
ki samxreT kavkasiis didi nawili
ki mis SemadgenlobaSi Sevida, ramac
xmelTaSuazRvispireTis gavlena gaaZliera.
sakuTari Zalauflebis gansamtkiceblad
da kavkasiaidan parTielebis gansadevnad
romi Tavis cnobil sardlebs, lukulussa
da pompeuss agzavnida. SemdgomSi
misi legionebi regionSi kontrolis
SesanarCuneblad rCebodnen. romaelTa
yofnam regions ekonomikuri socialuri
mdgradoba moutana.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 67
This small vessel, from a jar grave near Yevlakh, Azerbaijan, may have been a grave offering. The decorations, burnishing (polishing), and small feet are reflective of a non-utilitarian vessel. It is likely the pot had a lid, as suggested by the small holes in the flaring handles.
es patara WurWeli azerbaijanSi, evlaxSi, aRmoCenili qvevrsamarxidanaa. misi mxatvruli gaformeba, naprialebi zedapiri da mcire zomis fexi miuTiTebs, rom igi yoveldRiuri moxmarebis nivTi ar iyo. mas, savaraudod, sarqveli unda hqonoda.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor68
the state of Caucasian albania was established in the 4th century BC. Caucasian albania covered the territory of the present day Azerbaijan republic and the territories up to Goyja (Sevan) lake and South Dagestan. Its capital was Gabala and starting from the 5th century, the city of Barda. Derbend, Shamakhi, Shabran, Baylagan were other big cities of this state. Strabo, ptolemy, pliny, Cassius, plutarch and other antique period authors have provided information about Caucasian albania. Diverse religious traditions, including Zoroastrianism and Christianity, were practiced from the first years of AD. At the beginning of the 4th century, a certain segment of the alban society (including political elites), accepted Christianity. the existence of different religions in Albania is shown at burial sites, including pots, wooden boxes, catacombs and Christian graves. all of these graves were encountered in the pipelines corridor. the aforementioned graves of the Caucasian albany were discovered and excavated at 200, 204, 241, 316, 335,.336, 406, 408.8, 409.1 kms of the pipeline route. rich domestic items, trinkets and weapons were found in these graves; they proved that different types of craftsmanship were highly developed in Caucasian albania. Jewelry brought from the Near east provides information on albania’s vast economic and cultural relations. remains of one residential area dating from the 5th-3rd centuries BC and several burial sites were discovered during archaeological excavations conducted near the Girag Kasaman village in the agstafa region. In spite of the rural nature of this settlement, the remains of a metal-working kiln and numerous spindle whorls indicate the presence of local metal-working and weaving industries.
albaneTis samefo Zv.w IV saukuneSi
daarsda da Tanamedrove azerbaijanis,
samxreT daRestanisa da sevanis tbis
mimdebare teritoriebs moicavda.Mmisi
dedaqalaqi yabala, V saukunidan ki
bardavi iyo. darubandi, Samqori, Sarbani
da bailagani misi mniSvnelovani qalaqebi
iyo. albaneTis Sesaxeb Semonaxulia
strabonis, ptolemeusis, pliniusis,
kasiusisa da plutarqes cnobebi.
IV saukunis dasawyisSi albaneTma
qristianoba miiRo. mravalreliguroba
kargadaa asaxuli samarovnebze, sadac
qvevrsamarxebs, xis kuboebs, katakombebsa
da qristianul samarxebs vxvdebiT.
yvela CamoTvlili saxeobis samarxebi
milsadenebis derefanSic agdaSis, evlaxis,
iadilis, seidlaris, Cafarlis, girag-
qasaman II-is, foilosa da foilo II-is
samarovnebze gamovlinda. samarxebSi
aRmoCenili sxvadasxva daniSnulebis
nivTebis mdidruli asortimenti
albaneTSi xelosnobis ganviTarebis
maRal doneze migviTiTebs. axlo
aRmosavleTidan Semotanili samkauli ki
ganviTarebul ekonomikur da kulturul
urTierTobebze metyvelebs. sainteresoa
aRstafas raionSi, sof. girag-hasamanSi
aRmoCenili, V-III saukuneebis namosaxlari
da samarxebi. miuxedavad imisa, rom Zegli
aSkarad sofluri dasaxlebis tipisaa,
masze dafiqsirda rkinis sadnobi Rumelis
naSTi da bevri kvirisTavi, rac aq rkinis
metalurgiisa da rTvis ganviTarebaze
miuTiTebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 69
Antique Period-Early Medieval Period (ca. 200 BC – 650 AD) The later Antique Period is identified with the Roman Empire and the first centuries of the Byzantine empire. the end of this period is generally dated, by archaeologists in Azerbaijan, to coincide with the rise of Islam. this period saw rome’s expansion into southwest asia, as well as the subjugation of the unified Caucasian Albanian Kingdom of the South Caucasus by the persian Sassanid empire. the Sassanians strove to subjegate the South Caucasian states, while simultaneously attempting to limit incursions from northern tribes originating from the south russian steppes. In pursuit of the latter, they built a series of walls near Derbent, Azerbaijan. Imposing remains still stand, forming one of the region’s largest extant fortresses. In 5th century albanian alphabet, consisting of 52 letters was created.
Inscriptions at Gobustan and near Derbent document the roman presence in the Caucasus. Rome’s 12th legion, which was based at different times in Cappadocia and the highlands east of anatolia, may have exercised roman dominion over the greater Kura Valley and placed forces at the Derbent Gates. From this strategic location, the romans could have controlled movement between the North Caucasus Mountains and the Caspian Sea, thus restricting the migration of Goths and Huns from the Russian steppes. Azerbaijani archaeologists and historians believe that the community of ramany on the absheron peninsula north of Baku may have begun as a roman encampment.
antikuri xana da adre SuasaukuneebiA (Zv.w. 200 – ax.w. 650ww.)
gvianantikuri xana azerbaijanSi
romis imperiis Zlierebis xaniTa da
bizantiis imperiis pirveli saukuneebiT
ganisazRvreba.Aazerbaijaneli
arqeologebis azriT, am periodis
dasasruli islamis SemoRebas emTxveva.
am drois ganmavlobaSi regionSi jer
romi batonobda, Semdeg sasanurma imperiam
albaneTis samefo daimorCila. sasanuri
saxelmwifo cdilobda samxreTkavkasiur
saxelmwifoebs Soris arsebuli
dapirispirebebi gadaelaxa da aq samxreT
ruseTis stepebSi mobinadre momTabare
tomebis SemoWra aRekveTa.Aam miznebisaTvis
maT derbentSi im droisaTvis erT-
erTi mniSvnelovani TavdacviTi sistema
aages, romlis nawilic dRevandlamdea
SemorCenili. V saukuneSi Seiqmna albanuri
anbani, romelic 52 asos Seicavda.
gobusTansa da derbentSi aRmoCenili
warwerebi romaelTa kavkasiaSi yofnas
adasturebs. ivaraudeba, rom romis me-12
legionis erTi nawili, romlis ZiriTadi
dislokaciis adgilebi kapadokia da
aRmosavleTi anatolia iyo, derbentSi idga,
saidanac mtkvris xeobas akontrolebda.
garda amisa, kavkasiis mTebsa da kaspiis
zRvas Soris arsebuli gadasasvlelis
dapyrobiT igi xels uSlida goTebisa da
hunebis migracias samxreT kavkasiisaken.
azerbaijaneli istorikosebisa da
arqeologebis azriT, baqos CrdiloeTiT,
afSeronis naxevarkunZulze arsebuli
ramanis dasaxleba, SesaZloa,
Tavdapirvelad romauli banakidan
warmoSobiliyo.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor70
Members of the 12th Roman Legion (“Fuminata”) carved this important rock-art panel from Gobustan, Azerbaijan, during the reign of Emperor Domitian, ca. 75 AD. The legion, stationed in Cappadocia, was tasked with guarding Eastern Anatolia and the South Caucasus.
romis me-12 legioni “fuminatas” jariskacebma, imperator domicianes zeobisas, 75 wels, gobusTanis kldeze warwera amokveTes. legionis dislokaciis adgili kapadokia iyo, misi mizani ki - samxreT kavkasiisa da aRmisavleT anatoliis dacva.
milsadenebis teritoriis arqeologiuri
kvlevisas aRmoCenilia gvian antikuri da
Sua saukuneebis ramdenime Zegli. seidlar
II (samuxis raioni) da Cafarli (Samqoris
raioni) am periodis Zeglebia. Cafarli,
umniSvnelovanesi Zeglia da am periods
saukeTesod warmogviCens. masze adre
Suasaukuneebis arqiteqturuli detalebia
warmodgenili. rogorc Cans, igi albanur
sazogadoebas ekuTvnoda. arqiteqturul
detalze SemorCenil jvarze arsebuli
warwera gamTxrelebs aq qristianuli
samlocvelos arsebobas avaraudebinebs.
the aGt pipelines archaeological program found a few examples of antique period and later Medieval sites. the Seyidlar II residential area in the Samukh district (316 km) and the settlement and graveyard near the Chaparli village in the Shamkir district (335/336 km) are two such examples. the Chaparli site in particular is noteworthy because it contains early Medieval graves and architectural remains. the carved limestone decorations in the area, one of which appears to depict a cross, led the excavators to interpret the structure as an early Christian chapel, belonging to a local albanian community.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 71
This historic caravansaray (inn) in Sheki, Azerbaijan, has been refurbished as a contemporary hotel complex, with brick-lined corridors opening onto a courtyard.
es istoriuli qarvasla SaqSi (azerbaijani) Tanamedrove sastumrodaa gadakeTebuli, romlis aguriT nagebi derefnebi Sida ezoSi gadis.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor72
Medieval Period (ca. 650 – 1800AD) The Medieval Period in Azerbaijan saw the arrival and growth of Islamic culture, continuation of political upheaval, economic gains, and a flourishing intellectual environment whereby advances were made in the sciences and arts. In the middle of the 7th century, prior to arabian advancement, the Mihranid Dynasty of Caucasian Albania dominated in Azerbaijan. this dynasty also reported to the Iranian Shahs – Sasanian overloards. the Mihranids supported the Sasanians in fights against the Arabian conquerors during the 7th century. This support continued when the arabian conquerors defeated the Sasanians completely and put an end to the dictatorship of the Sasanians over Iran and the South Caucasus. Finally, the Mihranids formed a military alliance with the arab Islamic Caliphate. In the 9th century in Azerbaijan under the leadership of Babek, the Mihranids started a great struggle to break free from arab rule which lasted for 20 years. During this period certain portions of Azerbaijan began to be recognized as arran. Yet during this period many arabs also settled in Azerbaijan and became part of the ruling elite. Many of the local Christian and Zoroastrian populace slowly converted to Islam, although Christian communities are thought to have survived well into the Medieval period. Upon the elimination of arabian domination, local state authorities were established in Azerbaijan. Of them, the State of Sajiler connected all the historical lands of Azerbaijan for the first time. The State of Shirvanshahs, the center of which was Shamakhi, existed circa 1,000 years aD.
Sua saukuneebi (650 – 1800ww.)
Sua saukuneebis azerbaijanSi
TandaTanobiT gamoCnda, xolo Semdeg ki
damkvidrda islami, romelic jer arabebma
Semoitanes, Semdgom ki Turanuli modgmis
tomebma gaavrceles. islamurma kulturam
xeli Seuwyo ekonomikis, mecnierebisa da
xelovnebis ganviTarebas. VII saukunis
SuaxanebisaTvis azerbaijans, savaraudod,
albanuri mihranidebis dinastia marTavda,
romelic iranel sasanian Sahebs
emorCileboda. mihranidebi VII saukuneSi,
sasanidebis saboloo damarcxebamde, maT
arabTa winaaRmdeg brZolaSi exmarebodnen.
mihranidebi islamur xalifats
daemorCilnen, samagierod ki xelisufleba
IX saukunemde SeinarCunes. azerbaijanis
zogierT nawilSi, babeqis meTaurobiT
daiwyo antiarabuli ajanyebebi, romelic
20 weli grZeldeboda. janyebis dros
damoukidebeli qveynebi gaCnda, romelTa
saerTo saxelwodeba cnobilia, rogorc
arani. TandaTanobiT qveyanaSi mravali
arabi dasaxlda da mmarTveli elitis
nawilad iqca. adgilobrivi qristianuli
da zoroastruli mosaxleoba
TandaTanobiT islams Rebulobda,
Tumca, Suasaukuneebis ganmavlobaSi
ramdenime qristianuli Temi mainc
SemorCa. azerbaijanSi arabTa batonobis
damTavrebis Semdeg sajebis dinastiam
pirvelad gaaerTiana azerbaijanis
istoriuli miwebi. SirvanSahebis samefom
iarseba ax.w. 1000 wlamde.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 73
During the 10th and 11th centuries aD, the Shaddadids and ravvadids dominated portions of what is now Azerbaijan. Over time, the Seljuk empire, which expanded from Central asia to the aegean Sea, subjegated Iran and the southern Caucasus as well. Under the local sway of atabegs (governors) who ruled from their capital of Shamakhi, Azerbaijan played significant cultural and economic roles during the Seljuk period. For example, the great poets Khaghani and Nizami gained fame well beyond Azerbaijan, and continue to be revered for their eloquence and skill. Large cultural and commercial centers such as Ganja, Beylagan, tabriz, Nakhchivan, Shamakhi, and Shamkir, each with populations in the tens of thousands, were developed during this period.
Seljuk domination of the territory of Azerbaijan came to an end during the early 13th century aD, under pressure from Mongols who were moving in from Centra l asia. In 1235, they and the tartars destroyed many of the key cities in Azerbaijan, such as Ganja and Shamkir, and incorporated Azerbaijan into the Mongol Empire. Subsequent unrest followed an invasion by the forces of amir timur (tamerlane) in the late 14th century. It was at this time that the Garagoyunlu and aghgoyunlu states managed to subjugate surrounding regions. at the beginning of the 16th century, Shah Ismayil established the Azerbaijan Safavid State and Tabriz became its capital. Developing rapidly, this state connected all political bodies from Central asia to the Mediterranean Sea and evolved into a mighty empire. 5
X da XI saukuneebSiAazerbaijanis
sxavadasxva nawilebs ganagebda
Sadadidebisa da ravadidebis dinastiebi.
XI saukunidan seljukebma, romelTa
imperia Sua aziidan egeosis zRvamde iyo
gadaWimuli irani da samxreT kavkasia
daimorCiles. azerbaijans, romelic
mniSvnelovan kulturul da ekonomikur
rols asrulebda seljukur samyaroSi,
qalaq Semaxiadan aTabagi marTavda.
Aaq moRvaweobdnenDdidi poetebi xagani
da nizami. am periodSi ganviTarda
kulturuli da komerciuli centrebi:
ganja, Tavrizi, Samqori, Samaqia, romlebSiac
aTiaTasobiT adamiani cxovrobda.
azerbaijanis teritoriaze seljukebis
batonoba XIII saukunis pirvel naxevarSi
monRolebis SemoWriT dasrulda. 1235
wels maTAazerbaijanis mniSvnelovani
qalaqebi - ganja da Samqori daarbies da
qveyana monRolur imperias miuerTes. XIV
saukunis bolos Temur lengis Semosevebma
qveyanas didi ziani miayena. mogvianebiT
aRyoinlusa da yarayoinlus tomebma
mimdebare teritoriebze gaavrceles
Tavisi Zalaufleba. XVI saukuneSi Sahma
ismailma azerbaijanSi sefianTa dinastia
gabaatona da dedaqalaqad Tavrizi
gamoacxada. qveyana swrafad ganviTarda da
uZlieres imperiad Camoyalibda, romelmac
Sua azia da xmelTaSua zRva daakavSira
erTmaneTTan. 5
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor74
archaeologists from the Institute of archaeology and Ethnography and Azerbaijan’s Nationalacademy of Sciences, have conducted archaeological excavations in a number of villages dating back to the Medieval period, including Girag Kasaman in the Agstafa district, Dashbulag in the Shamkir district and Fakhrali in the Goranboy district. these archaeological sites create opportunities for understanding the economic activity, burial and domestic practices, inter-regional trade networks, and historical understanding of the Islamic period in Azerbaijan. they also augmented understanding of domestic activities and burial practices, as well as economic relations and transportation routes along the Silk Road, as revealed by the trade goods and fine crafts recovered. The continuity of occupation at many of these sites may reflect an unusual degree of cultural stability, in spite of the political turmoil of the period.
extensive excavations dating to the Medieval Period were conducted in cities of Azerbaijan during the second half of the twentieth century, but there were no thorough investigations of village-type settlements. That gap was addressed to some extent by the archaeological excavations conducted within the pipelines corridor. Chapter 3 reviews some of these sites in detail.
azerbaijanis mecnierebaTa akademiis
arqeologiisa da eTnografiis
institutis mecnierebma Sua saukuneebis
araerTi arqeologiuri Zegli -girag
qasamani (aRstafis raioni), daSbulaqi
(Samqoris raioni) da faxrali
(geranbois raioni) Seiswavles. am
samuSaoebma naTeli mohfina imdroindeli
meurneobis, dakrZalvis wesebis, savaWro
urTierTobebis, azerbaijanis islamuri
periodis istoriisa da abreSumis gzis
funqcionirebis sakiTxebs. am ZeglTa
umravlesoba did xans funqcionirebda,
rac miuxedavad mZime politikuri
mdgomareobisa, kulturuli cxovrebis
mdgrad ganviTarebaze migvaniSnebs.
XX saukunis meore naxevarSiAazerbaijanis
Sua saukuneebis qalaqebis teritoriaze
intensiuri arqeologiuri gaTxrebi
mimdinareobda, magram sasoflo
dasaxlebebi kargad ar iyo Seswavlili.
es nakli milsadenis mSneblobisas
Seivso. wignis mesame TavSi am periodis
zogierTi Zeglis detaluri aRwera iqneba
warmodgenili.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 75
In 2004, these gold earrings, 3.4 centimeters indiameter and dating from the 5th-4th centuriesBC, were found in Azerbaijan’s Samux region in awoman’s grave, placed near her ears. The endsof the earrings are in the shape of the head of asnake, which in ancient times may have representedwisdom, a sense of unity, and protection. The snakeimage has also been associated with medicine andthe underworld.
2004 wels azerbaijanSi, samuxis raionSi, gaiTxara Zv.w. V-IV saukuneebis qalis samarxi, sadac oqros es sayureebi (diametri - 3,4 sm) aRmoCnda. sayureebis boloebi gvelis Tavis formisaa. warsulSi gveli sibrZnis simbolod miiCneoda.Mmisi gamosaxulebebi ukavSirdeba medicinas, qvesknels, sieSmakesa da intuicias da agreTve gaaxalgazrdavebasac ki.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor76
saqarTvelo
paleoliTi da epipaleoliTi (1.8 milioni – Zv.w. 8000 w.)
qveynis saxeli - saqarTvelo ukavSirdeba
erT-erT qarTvelur toms, qarTs,
romelmac qarTveli eris CamoyalibebaSi
umniSvnelovanesi roli iTamaSa. jer kidev
qveda paleoliTidan qveynis teritoria
mudmivad iyo dasaxlebuli. dmanisSi
Catarebuli arqeologiuri gaTxrebisas
aRmoCenili adamianis winaprebis asaki 1,8
milions wels aRwevs. aqauri hominidebi
afrikis gareT dasaxlebuli adamianis
uZvelesi winaprebi arian. saqarTvelos
teritoriaze qvis xanis SedarebiT
gviandeli periodebis araerTi Zeglicaa
mikvleuli. milsadenebis gaswvriv am
drois dasaxlebebi ar aRmoCenila,
Tumca, zedapirulad mikvleuli qvis
xanis iaraRebi imaze migviTiTebs, rom
am teritoriis maxloblad qvis xanis
sxvadasxva periodis arqeologiuri
Zeglebia sagulvebeli.
Georgia
Paleolithic/Epipaleolithic Age (ca. 1.8 million years – 8000 BC)
the native name for the country of Georgia is Sakartvelo, named after the ancient Georgian tribe Kartli, which played the central role in the long process of ethnogenesis of the Georgian nation. the territory of modern-day Georgia has been inhabited since the paleolithic age. the earliest remains of human ancestors outside of africa were unearthed at the Dmanisi archaeological site, which dates from approximately 1.8 million years ago. The site has yielded the remains of at least five pre-human hominids, and examples of some of the earliest tools associated with human ancestors. Later prehistoric remains (paleolithic, Mesolithic, and Neolithic) have been discovered in numerous caves and open-air sites in Georgia. No sites from these periods were, however, found along the pipeline route in Georgia, even though surface findings indicated that there should be Stone Age or other pre-Chalcolithic sites in the area.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 77
Chalcolithic/Eneolithic (ca. 5500 – 3000 BC)
the early agricultural culture of the Caucasus developed during the 6th millennium BC, and by the second half of the 4th millennium BC, it had evolved into the Kura-Araxes culture that extended across the Caucasus, northern Iran, and eastern anatolia.
the aGt pipelines archaeological program involved excavations at several archaeological sites from the Chalcolithic/eneolithic and the early Bronze age periods along the pipeline route in Georgia. One of these, Nachivchavebi, located in the tetritskaro District and believed to date from approximately 3,700 to 3,200 BC, contained artifacts from both the early agricultural and Kura-Araxes cultures. The excavations revealed storage pits and several burial sites. the artifacts, including ceramics and obsidian and bone tools, suggest that the population was mainly occupied with agriculture, stock-breeding, and small-scale handicrafts. The burial sites have contributed to understanding the evolution of burial practices in the Chalcolithic and early Bronze ages.
ethnobotanical remains suggest that crop cultivation, horticulture, and wine production were well-developed by that time and that barley, hazelnut, chestnut, millet, mushrooms, grapes, buckwheat, and common wheat were likely foodstuffs. Faunal materials from wild species (horses, boars, noble deer, and elk) and domestic animals (goats, cows, oxen, and sheep) point to a combination of animal husbandry and hunting.
eneoliTi (Zv.w. 5500 – 3000ww.)
adresamiwaTmoqmedo kulturebi
saqarTveloSi Zv.w. VI aTaswleulSi
warmoiqmna da ganviTarda. Zv.w. IV
aTaswleulis meore naxevridan ki maT
mtkvar-araqsis kultura Caenacvla, romlis
gavrcelebis areali aRmosavleT kavkasias,
Crdilo iransa da anatolias moicavda.
milsadenebis gaswvriv saqarTveloSi
Catarebulma arqeologiurma gaTxrebma
ramdenime eneoliTuri da adrebrinjaos
xanis Zeglic moicva. TeTriwyaros raionSi
mdebare Zegli naWivWavebi, romelic Zv.w.
3700 - 3200 wlebiT TariRdeba, Seicavs,
rogorc adresamiwaTmoqmedo kulturebis,
ise - mtkvar-araqsuli kulturis
fenebs. gaTxrebma aq sameurneo ormoebi
da samarxebi gamoavlina. mikvleul
arqeologiur masalaze dayrdnobiT
gairkva, rom aqauri mosaxleoba misdevda
miwaTmoqmedebasa da mesaqonleobas,
ganviTarebuli iyo xelosnobac.
samarxebidan mopovebuli masala
garkveul warmodgenas qmnis eneoliTuri
da adrebrinjaos xanis dakrZalvis
ritualebis msgavseba-gansxvavebaze.
eTnobotanikuri monacemebis mixedviT
irkveva, rom am droisaTvis kargad iyo
ganviTarebuli memindvreoba, mebaReoba da
meRvineoba. sakvebad gamoiyeneboda qeri,
Txili, wabli, fetvi, soko, yurZeni, xorbali.
mesaqonleobis ganviTarebaze migvaniSnebs
Sinauri cxovelebis _ Txis, Zroxis, xaris,
cxvris naSTebi. ganviTarebuli iyo
nadirobac.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor78
The Tiselis Seri settlement and cemetery in the Borjomi District provide valuable data about the next stage of development of the Kura-Araxes culture. the site contains a village and a cemetery from the second quarter of the 3rd millennium BC. the most important artifacts from the excavations here are pottery. The vessels are handmade, not wheel-thrown, and the larger ones are decorated with relief spirals or other curvilinear motifs. The site also yielded fibers of wool and flax, and the presence of multi-colored threads indicates that weaving was practiced. there is evidence of connections to northeastern anatolia during the time the site was active.
Early Bronze Age (ca. 3000 – 2000 BC) early Bronze age societies seemed to have been relatively stable socially and economically. In the middle of the 3rd millennium BC the Culture of Early Bronze Age Kurgans developed in the eastern Caucasus. It co-existed with the later stage of the Kura-Araxes culture in the Southern Caucasus and was situated between between the Kura (Mtkvari) and Araxes rivers. Both cemeteries and settlements have been uncovered in this area. typically, houses were single story, mud and stone brick that were reinforced with wood frames. the primary new element of this culture was a distinctive burial ritual: the deceased were buried in kurgans, graves defined by stone or soil mounds; in some cases, the kurgans exceeded 100 meters in diameter and 8-10 meters in height. The Culture of Early Kurgans persisted through the end of the 3rd millennium BC. The Kura-araxes culture also characterized with special ceramic decorative traits and the bronze smelting technology in the mid-fourth millennium BC.
Tiselis seris nasaxlari da samarovani,
romelic borjomis raionSi mdebareobs
da milsadenebis teritoriaze gaiTxara,
mtkvar-araqsuli kulturis ganviTarebis
Semdgomi etapia da Zv.w. III aTaswleulis
meore meoTxediT TariRdeba.
mniSvnelovania aq aRmoCenili keramikuri
nawarmi, romelic xeliTaa damzadebuli.
mozrdili WurWlebi Semkulia
reliefuri da amokawruli ornamentiT.
aq mopovebuli selisa da Salis feradi
boWkoebis arseboba safeiqro ostatobaze
miuTiTebs. Zeglze aRmoCenili masalis
nawili Crdilo-aRmosavleT anatoliis
arqeologiur masalasTan avlens kavSirs.
adre brinjaos xana (Zv.w. 3000 – 2000ww.)
adrebrinjaos xanis sazogadoeba
stabilurobiTa da socialuri
cvlilebebis neli tempiT xasiaTdeba.
Zv.w. III aTasweulis SuaxanebSi
samxreT kavkasiaSi warmoiSva
adrebrinjaos yorRanebis kultura,
romelic Tavdapirvelad mtkvar-
araqsis kulturasTan Tanaarsebobda.
Mmtkvar-araqsul kulturas axasiaTebda
erTsarTuliani, marTkuTxa formis,
aliziTa da qviT nagebi Senobebi, romlebic
xiT iyo gamagrebuli. es kultura
gamoirCeva ornamentirebuli keramikiTa
da brinjaos damuSavebiTac. adrebrinjaos
yorRanebis kulturis mTavari niSani
dakrZalvis rituali iyo. micvalebulebs
krZalavdnen yorRanebSi _ samarxebSi,
romlebic maRali qva-miwayriliT iyo
daculi. zogjer yorRanebis simaRle 8-10
metrsac ki aWarbebda, diametri ki - 100
metrs. adreuli yorRanebis kultura Zv.w.
III aTaswleulis bolomde arsebobda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 79
Without doing harm to the artifacts found along thepipeline, archeologists used white caulk to recreatebroken pots. All restorations must be reversibleso that the artifacts can be returned to the originalstate in which they were found should further studybe required. This pot from Tkemlara demonstratesthe technique.
arqeologebi gaTxrebisas aRmoCenili Tixis WurWlis aRsadgenad TabaSirs xmaroben, riTac WurWlis naklul nawilebs aRadgenen da mas Tavdapirvel saxes ubruneben. es WurWeli tyemlaridan swored asea aRdgenili.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor80
two kurgans, both dated to the mid-3rd millennium BC, were excavated in different parts of Georgia—Tori and Kvemo Kartli—during the pipelines project. The Tori site, known as the Kodiani Kurgan, is located on a ridge dividing two drainages of the Kodiana Mountain in the Borjomi district. A rock-filled mound measuring 14 meters in diameter with a pit (burial chamber) defines the kurgan at this site. Fragments of the burned human remains of a woman of about 50 in the burial chamber suggest that the deceased was cremated. the items buried with her included pots with black polished surfaces, one of which was decorated with incised and grooved ornaments. Generating the most interest, however, was evidence of apiculture (honey making) in the burial’s ceramic vessels. previously, the earliest archaeological evidence of apiculture was found in asia Minor and egypt, but the tori site now appears to represent one of the earliest honeymaking locations.
The Tremlara Kurgan was found at the Kvemo Kartli site in the Tetritskaro district. It lies on the slope of the Bedeni Mountain and is characterized by a circular, rock- and soil-filled mounds 23m in diameter that encompassed two human graves (both 3rd millennium BC). The first grave, which did not have human remains inside of it, occupies a main central chamber cut in the bedrock and filled with stones, and contained a polished stone axe, bronze dagger, several small pots, and carbonized fragments of four wooden chariot wheels. the second grave is cut into the northwest side of the main chamber, and contained the remains of a woman. Both graves date to the mid-3rd millennium BC.
saqarTvelos or mxareSi - Torsa
(borjomis raionSi) da qvemo qarTlSi
(TeTriwyaros raionSi) milsadenis
mSeneblobisas gaiTxara Zv.w. III
aTaswleulis Suaxanebis ori yorRani.
kodianis yorRani mdebareobs borjomis
raionSi, kodianis mTaze. samarxi
dafaruli iyo 14 metris diametris
qvayriliT. dasakrZalavi kamera miwaSi iyo
amoRebuli. samarxSi 50-iode wlis qalis
kremirebuli naSTebi iyo SemorCenili.
samarxSi Catanebuli iyo Tixis ramdenime
Savpriala WurWeli, romelTagan
erTi ornamentirebuli iyo. uaRresad
saintereso aRmoCnda erTi WurWlis
SigTavsi, romlis analizis Sedegad
dadginda, rom qoTanSi Tafli inaxeboda.
am aRmoCenamde iTvleboda, rom
mefutkreoba mcire aziasa da
egvipteSi gaCnda, Tumca, Toris masala
qronologiurad oriveze adreulia.
tyemlaras yorRani (Zv.w. III aTaswleulis
Sua xanebi) mdebareobs qvemo qarTlSi,
TeTriwyaros raionSi, bedenis mTis
samxreT-dasavleT ferdobze. yorRani
qva-miwayriliani, wriuli formisa iyo
(diametri 23 m.). masSi ori samarxi
dafiqsirda. ZiriTadi samarxi yorRanis
centrSi, TixnarSi, iyo amoWrili, meore
samarxi ki misgan Crdilo-dasavleTiT
aRmoCnda gamarTuli. orive samarxis
iatakze aRmoCenilia danaxSirebuli
etlis RerZisa da borblis fragmentebi,
naprialebi qvis culi da brinjaos
satevari, agreTve Tixis Savpriala
WurWeli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 81
Middle Bronze Age (ca. 2000 – 1600 BC) the Middle Bronze age corresponds to trialeti Culture (2000-1500 BC) in Georgia. the culture is named for the trialeti plateau, the area of southcentral Georgia traversed by the pipeline. the culture is best known for large and elaborate tombs and kurgans and cobbled access roads. these kurgans are famous for their brilliant grave goods that contain ceramic and bronze objects, which include fine jewelry.
although these elaborate burial rituals suggest a complex social structure, almost nothing is known about the domestic life of trialeti people because to date very few examples of Trialeti settlements have been found.
During the pipeline construction, a settlement from the Middle Bronze age was excavated in the historical province of Georgia trialeti, tsalka District, on the plain north of Jinisi village, on the left bank of Gumbatistskali River. The Jinisi settlement consisted of two construction layers. Some of the earliest artifacts also came from the Mousterian or Middle paleolithic.
the most important discoveries, however, were the houses and artifacts from the Middle Bronze age. Four houses dating back to the end of the Middle Bronze age featured a semi-dugout design. Stone walls were built in single-row bond masonry, and the floors were leveled with clay. Stone bases that fixed the wooden columns were situated in front of the walls and at the center of the interior. the columns supported flat roofs, and each house contained an oven and a hearth. the construction technique was similar to that used in the burial chambers of kurgans of the trialeti Culture. the pottery discovered on the floors of the houses was black-burnished and ornamented with imprinted triangles, again typical of the pottery found in kurgans of the trialeti Culture.
Sua brinjaos xana (Zv.w. 2000 – 1600ww.)
saqarTveloSi Suabrinjaos xana
“TrialeTur kulturas” ukavSirdeba. es
saxeli am kulturas qveynis samxreTiT
mdebare TrialeTis zeganis gamo
daerqva. am zegans milsadeni did zolze
kveTs. TrialeTis kultura yvelaze
metad didi da sagangebod gamarTuli
samarxebiT _ yorRanebiT, aseve maTken
mimavali mokirwyluli saritualo
gzebiT, ornamentirebuli keramikiTa da
brwyinvale saiuveliro nakeTobebiTaa
cnobili.
dakrZalvis rTuli ritualebisaTvis
Sesabamisi mdidari socialuri
struqturis miuxedavad, TrialeTis
mosaxleobis yofa-cxovrebis Sesaxeb
TiTqmis araferia cnobili, radgan am
kulturisadmi mikuTvnili mxolod
ramdenime namosaxlaria cnobili.
milsadenebis mSeneblobisas saqarTvelos
istoriul mxareSi, TrialeTSi (walkis
raioni), sof. jinisis maxloblad gaiTxara
Sua brinjaos xanis namosaxlari. aq
zedapirulad akrefilia Sua paleoliTis,
mustieuri qvis iaraRi, romelic
Tavdapirveli adgilidan daZruli unda
iyos.
umniSvnelovanesia Sua brinjaos
xanis fenaSi mikvleuli nivTebi. aq
Seswavlili oTxi saxli TixnarSi
CaWrili naxevradmiwuri nagebobaa, romlis
kedlebi riyis qviTaa nagebi, iataki TixiT
iyo motkepnili. saxlebis gadaxurva
banuria; brtyeli saxuravi dabjenili
iyo qvis baliSebze dadgmul xis boZebze.
saxlebSi gamarTuli iyo kera da Rumeli.
saxlebis konstruqcia garkveulwilad
TrialeTuri kulturis yorRanebSi
gamoyenebul samSeneblo teqnikas emTxveva.
nagebobebSi aRmoCenili keramikis nawili
Savprialaa da Semkulia StampiT datanili
samkuTxa ornamentiT, rac TrialeTis
kulturisaTvisaa damaxasiaTebeli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor82
Jinisi is the first settlement where this type of pottery has been uncovered. Other artifacts found at the site—a variety of querns, mortars, chopping tools—along with the results of pollen studies indicate the advanced development of agricultural crop production in the 18th-17th centuries BC, with wheat and rye the major crops. Bones of wild animals discovered on the floors of the houses demonstrate the importance of hunting and well-developed experience with farm animals, including horse breeding.
Late Bronze-Early Iron Age (ca. 1600 – 600 BC) the Late Bronze age in Georgia saw the start of the historical distinction between eastern and western Georgia. assyrian and then Urartian written sources contain the first references to proto-Georgian tribes and states. the proto-Georgian state of Diauehi (Diauhi or Diaokhi) was formed in the 12th century BC at the sources of the Chorokhi and Euphrates Rivers. It is first identified with the state of Daiaeni and with an inscription dating from Assyrian King Tiglath-Pileser I’s third year (1118 BC). After centuries of battling for independence from the Assyrians, in the first half of the 8th century BC Urartu annexed a large part of Diauehi. extremely weakened by these wars, in the mid 8th century BC Diauehi was finally destroyed by another proto-Georgian kingdom, Kulkha (Colchis in Greek sources). Colchis was formed in the 13th century BC on the eastern shore of the Black Sea. according to Greek mythology, it was a wealthy kingdom situated in the mysterious periphery of the heroic world. here, in the sacred grove of the war god Ares, King Aeetes hung the Golden Fleece until Jason and the argonauts seized it. Colchis was also the land where Zeus punished the mythological prometheus for revealing the secret of fire to humanity by chaining him to a mountain. Colchis disintegrated after the invasion of Cimmerians and Scythians in the last quarter of the 8th century BC.
jinisi dReisaTvis erTaderTi
namosaxlaria, sadac amgvari keramikaa
aRmoCenili. Zeglze mikvleuli sxva
nivTebi da palinologiuri masala Zv.w.
XVIII - XVII saukuneebSi miwaTmoqmedebis
ganviTarebaze mianiSnebs.Aaqaurebs
qeri da xorbali mohyavdaT. nadirobis
mniSvnelobasa da mecxoveleobis
ganviTarebas xazs usvams saxlebSi
aRmoCenili cxovelTa Zvlebi, maT Soris
cxenis naSTebi, romelTa arsebobac
Sinauri cxovelebis moSenebaze
migviTiTebs.
gvianbrinjao-adrerkinis xana (Zv.w. 1600 – 600ww.)
gviani brinjaos xana erTiani qarTveluri
enis aRmosavlur da dasavleT qarTul
enebad gamijvnis sawyis periods
emTxveva. protoqarTveluri tomebisa da
saxelmwifoebrivi gaerTianebebis Sesaxeb
uZvelesi cnobebi asurulsa da urartul
wyaroebSi moipoveba. erT-erTi maTgani
iyoDdiaoxi, romlis Camoyalibeba Zv.w. XII
saukunisaTvisaa navaraudevi. igi pirvelad
ixseniebaAasureTis mefe tiglaTfileser
I-is warweraSi (Zv.w. 1118ww). Zv.w. VIII
saukuneSi urartum ramdenjerme ilaSqra
diaoxSi da misi nawilis dapyrobac
moaxerxa. amave saukunis Sua xanebSi
omebisagan dasustebuli diaoxi mezobelma,
aseve protoqarTvelurma saxelmwifom,
kulxam (kolxeTma) daimorCila. kolxeTis
samefo Savi zRvis aRmosavleT sanapiroze
Zv.w. XIII saukuneSi warmoiSva. berZnuli
miTebis mixedviT, es mdidari qveyana
gmiruli samyaros ganapiras mdebareobda.
kolxeTis mefe aieti aresis WalaSi
oqros sawmiss inaxavda, romelic Semdeg
argonavtebma gaitaces. miTi promeTes
Sesaxeb gviambobs, rom man xalxs cecxlis
saidumlo gaacno, zevsma ki igi dasaja
da kolxeTis mTebSi kldes miajaWva. Zv.w.
VIII saukuneSi kolxeTSi kimirielebi da
skviTebi SeiWrnen, ramac qveynis dacema
gamoiwvia.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 83
These necklaces are made of carnelian andglass paste beads. The white and green ones,called domino-like beads, are characteristic of the7th-6th century BC. All were found at the Eli BabaCemetery near Tsalka, Georgia on the necks orhands of human remains. Because the graves hadpreviously been looted, the individual beads hadbeen displaced, so it was impossible to identifywhich objects were parts of necklaces and whichof bracelets.
es yelsabamebi sardionisa da miniseburi pastisagan Sedgeba. TeTri da mwvane mZivebi cnobilia, rogorc dominoseburi mZivebi da Zv.w. VII–VI saukuneebiT TariRdeba. yvela aRmoCenilia saqarTveloSi, walkis raionSi, eli babas samarovanze, micvalebulebis yelisa da mkerdis areSi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor84
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 85
A number of bronze pendants similar to the circularornament on the right were found in graves ofthe Eli Baba Cemetery near Tsalka, Georgia. Theunidentified bronze object on the left, which wasfound in a location adjacent to the pendant, mayhave also been worn as a decorative item. Severalother bronze artifacts such as pins and braceletswere discovered at this site.
eli babas samarovanze (saqarTvelo, walkis raioni) sxvadasxva formis brinjaos samkaulia aRmoCenili (sakinZebi, sakidebi, samajurebi da sxva). marjvniv gverdebamoWrili wriuli formis sakidia, marcxena fotoze aseve sakidia gamosaxuli. orive nivTi erT samarxSia mopovebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor86
Excavations of the Late Bronze Age graves in theEli Baba Cemetery generally yielded few burialartifacts, perhaps because of looting.
eli babas samarovnis gaTxrebisas arc Tu ise bevri arqeologiuri masala gamoavlina, ragan samarovani gaZarcvuli iyo.
Several of the circular stone graves in the Eli BabaCemetery were marked by a menhir (vertical stone).An unfortunate consequence of the use of menhirswas to signal the presence of the necropolis forlater grave looters.
eli babas samarovnis zogierTi samarxze vertikalurad aRmarTuli qva -menhiri idga. mogvianebiT mZarcvelebi samarovnebs am niSnis mixedviT agnebdnen.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 87
This necklace of bone and ivory was one of severalfound at the Eli Baba site.
mZivebis es asxma eli babas samarovnis mcireodeni masalis erTi nawilia.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor88
gvianbrinjao – adrerkinis xanis
aRmosavleT saqarTvelos Sesaxeb
werilobiTi wyaroebi ar arsebobs, Tumca,
am periodis Sesaxeb mniSvnelovani
informacia arqeologiuri Zeglebis
Seswavlam mogvca. erT-erTi aseTi Zeglia
milsadenebis mSeneblobisas gaTxrili
safar-xarabas samarovani, romelic mesame
TavSi iqneba ganxiluli.
adreantikuri xana (Zv.w. 600 – 300ww.)
Zv.w. VI saukunis SuaxanSi kolxeTis
samxreTiT mosaxle tomebi aqemeniduri
iranis XIX satrapiaSi Sevidnen. kolxeTis
ganviTarebulma ekonomikam, xelsayrelma
geografiulma mdebareobam da klimatma
Savi zRvis kolxeTis sanapiroze
berZnul kolonizacias Seuwyo xeli.
Zv.w. VI-V saukuneebSi berZnebma TavianTi
axalSenebi fazisSi, gienosSi, pitiuntsa
da dioskuriaSi daaarses. am drois
kolxeTi unda yofiliyo ekonomikurad
da kulturulad dawinaurebuli qveyana,
romelsac saxelmwifoebriobis ZiriTadi
niSnebi _ teritoriul-administraciuli
dayofa, centralizebuli mmarTveloba
(aetidebis samefo dinastia), intensiuri
saqalaqo cxovreba da sagadasaxado sistema
hqonda. saqarTvelos aRmosavleTi nawili
- qarTli nawilobriv emorCileboda
aqemenidur imperias.Aaq mimdinareobda
saxelmwifos warmoSobis rTuli procesi,
romelic IV saukunis dasasruls qarTlis
samefos CamoyalibebiT dasrulda.
There are no written sources about the territory of eastern Georgia in the Late Bronze-early Iron age. however, several rich archaeological sites provide information about the cultural and political situation. One of the most interesting sites of the Late Bronze Age, the Saphar-Kharaba cemetery (discussed more extensively in Chapter 3), was excavated as a result of the pipeline construction.
Early Classical (Early Antique) Period (ca. 600 – 300 BC)
toward the mid-6th century BC, the tribes living in southern Colchis were incorporated into the 19th Satrapy of persia. the advanced economy and favorable geographic and natural conditions of the area attracted Greeks, who colonized the Colchian coast, establishing trading posts at phasis, Guuenos, Dioscurias, and pitius during the 6th-5th centuries BC. according to archaeological discoveries, Colchis emerged as an economically and culturally advanced state during this period, with evidence of key elements of a strong civilization: civic structure (territorial-administrative divisions) and central state authority (the royal dynasty of the aeetids); intensive urban life; a complex taxation system; and cultural manifestations, including architecture. the eastern part of Georgia is believed to have been partially under the achaemenid empire. During this period various eastern Georgian tribes struggled for leadership, with the Kartlian tribes eventually prevailing. at the end of the 4th century BC the Kartli (Iberia) Kingdom, the first eastern Georgian state, was founded.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 89
This particular object, the head of a bull made ofclay mixed with straw, was found in one of thestructures of the Ktsia Valley settlement datingfrom the 6th-4th centuries BC. The bull is believedto have been a holy animal associated with fertilityand the moon. Depictions of the bull are found atsites of various periods.
alizisagan damzadebuli xaris Tavi qciis velis namosaxlaris erT-erT saxlSi aRmoCnda. xari wminda cxoveli iyo, romelic mTvaresa da nayofierebas ganasaxierebda. xaris gamosaxulebebi saqarTveloSi araerT Zeglze gvxvdeba.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor90
milsadenebis mSeneblobisas aRmoCnda
da gaiTxaraAadreantikuri xanis
mniSvnelovani Zegli - qciis velis
namosaxlari. Zegli mdebareobs borjomis
raionSi, sof. tabawyuris maxloblad,
zRvis donidan 2000 metris simaRleze. misi
qveda fena adrebrinjaos xanisaa, xolo
zeda Zv.w. VI-IV saukuneebiT TariRdeba.
namosaxlarze aRmoCenili nagebobebis
umetesoba brtyeli qvebiTa da TixiT iyo
naSenebi da banuri gadaxurva hqonda. erT
saxlSi dadasturda alizis sakurTxeveli
da xaris Tavis (xari wminda cxoveli
iyo, romelic mTvaresa da nayofierebas
ganasaxierebda) qandakeba. Tixis WurWeli
sameTuneo morgvze iyo damzadebuli,
iSviaTia xeliT damzadebuli nimuSebi.
ornamenti reliefuri an amoRarulia.
wiTeli feris, naprialebi WurWlis erTi
fragmenti, rogorc Cans, importirebulia.
miwaTmoqmedeba, simaRlis gamo SedarebiT
SezRuduli iyo da aq klimatis Sesaferi
marcvleuli _ qeri da Svria mohyavdaT.
mecxoveleobas wamyvani roli hqonda.
namosaxlari ramdenjerme, savaraudod,
saomari moqmedebebisas gadamwvara.
elinisturi xana (Zv.w. IV saukunis bolo – Zv.w. I saukunis dasasruli)
elinisturi xana, zogierTi mosazrebiT, Zv.w.
336 wels aleqsandre makedonelis taxtze
asvlidan iwyeba da Zv.w. 31 wels, egviptis
dedofal kleopatra VII-is gardacvalebiT,
mTavrdeba. Zv.w IV-III saukuneebis
mijnaze qarTlis samefo mniSvnelovan
regionalur Zalad Camoyalibda da saTave
daudo erTian qarTul civilizacias.
One of the important early antique period sites excavated during the pipeline construction isKtsia Valley, located in the Borjomi District. The site, which sits on a bank of the Ktsia River at 2,000 meters above sea level, contains older layers dating from the Kura-Araxes culture, as well as the remains of a much larger settlement dating from the 6th-4th centuries BC.
Most of the structures at the site were built of flat stones fixed with clay, with evidence of structures that apparently supported flat roofs. An altar made of clay mixed with straw, and the head of a bull (an animal thought to have had ritual significance and associated with fertility and the moon) made of the same material, were also found. Generally, pottery was wheel-thrown; handmade items were rare. Ornaments were either engraved or embossed. One fragment of a polished red ceramic vessel seems to have been imported. agricultural activity was somewhat restricted, perhaps because of the elevation, although cattle-breeding was important. Barley and oats (species well-adapted to the local environment) were cultivated. During the final stages of the settlement’s existence, it was destroyed by fire several times, possibly as a result of conquests.
Hellenistic Period (ca. 300 BC – 0 AD)
the hellenistic period is usually said to extend from the accession of alexander the Great to the throne of Macedonia in 336 BC to the death of Cleopatra VII of Egypt in 30 BC. During the late 4th-early 3rd centuries BC, the eastern Georgian Kartli Kingdom emerged as a powerful force and created a single Georgian civilization. according to written sources from medieval Georgia,
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 91
qarTuli werilobiTi wyaroebis Tanaxmad,
mcxeTeli aristokratiis warmomadgenelma
farnavazma brZolaSi daamarcxa Tavisi
metoqe azo da Tavi qarTlis mefed
gamoacxada. man Seqmna samxedro, fiskaluri
da administraciuli sistema. qveyana
daiyo saerisTaovebad, sadac samefo
xarki ikrifeboda. farnavazma aseve Seqmna
erTiani saxelmwifo religia, romlis
saTaveSi mefesTan gaigivebuli RvTaeba
– armazi idga. Zv.w. III saukuneSi qveyana
Zlierdeboda da sazRvrebs afarToebda.
Semdgomi ori saukune omianobis xana iyo.
Zv.w 66-65 wlebSi, pontosa (Tanamedrove
CrdiloeT TurqeTi) da armeniis mokavSire
romaelma sardalma pompeusma qarTlSi
gailaSqra. mefe artagma mas winaaRmdegoba
ver gauwia da igi iZulebuli gaxda
Tavi romis “mokavSired da megobrad”
gamoecxadebina.
saqarTveloSi elinisturi xanis araerTi
Zeglia gaTxrili. miuxedavad amisa, qvemo
qarTlSi kargad Semonaxuli namosaxlari
ar iyo Seswavlili. milsadenebis
teritoriis arqeologiuri Seswavlisas
TeTriwyaros raionSi gaiTxara am
periodis nasaxlari da samarovani - A
sxalTa. aq mikvleuli Senobebi qviTa
da aliziT iyo nagebi. dadginda, rom
mosaxleoba eweoda mebaReobasa da
mevenaxeobas, agreTve mohyavdaT xorbali
da seli.
samarovanze 60 samarxi (ormosamarxebi
da qvayuTebi) gaiTxara. samarxebis Tavze
Sewiruli cxvrebisa da Txebis Zvlebi
aRmoCnda.
parnavaz, the representative of the aristocracy in Mtskheta, the ancient capital of Georgia, defeated his rival Azo and declared himself King of Kartli. Parnavaz created a system of military, fiscal, and administrative units, subdividing the country into several counties, called saeristavos, which paid tributes to the king. parnavaz also established a single national cult around the supreme deity, Armazi, who personified the supreme ruler of the state. During the 3rd century BC, the Kartli (Iberia) Kingdom grew in power and expanded to the west. Incessant warfare characterized the following two centuries, with the kingdom forced to defend itself against numerous invasions. When the close association between armenia and pontus (currently located in north turkey) resulted in an invasion by Pompey in 66-65 BC, King Artag of Kartli was forced to become a subordinate ally of rome. Numerous important sites in Georgia dating from this time have been excavated, including cities, temples, and cemeteries. however, until the pipeline project, no settlements had been found in this location. the project conducted the excavation at Skhalta, which included both a settlement and a cemetery. The structures there were quadrangular, built of stone and possibly mud brick. the population mostly engaged in animal husbandry, along with gardening, viticulture, and cultivation of wheat and flax.
Sixty graves were excavated at Skhalta, including square stone tombs and pit burials. there were bones of sacrificial sheep and goats on the surface of the graves, and human remains inside them.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor92
This well-preserved wooden comb (on the right)from Skhalta, Georgia, is a rare find for a Hellenisticsite. Curly locks were the style of both womenand men, and combs were created to secure hairaccessories made of flowers, myrtle, and ivy, oftenin the shape of wreaths. The ear cleaner (left) isa rare example of one made from bone; most earcleaners found from the Hellenistic period weremade of bronze.
es patara, xis savarcxeli (marjvniv) sxalTidan (saqarTvelo) kargadaa Semonaxuli. aseTi nivTebi elinisturi xanis Zeglebze Zalze iSviaTad gvxvdeba. ilari (marcxniv) yuris gasawmendad gamoiyeneboda. igi Zvlisaganaa damzadebuli, rac didi iSviaTobaa. rogorc wesi, am nivTebs liTonisagan amzadebdnen.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 93
These three tools from Skhalta are made of iron.The battle axe (left) and the spear head (middle)were placed next to the face or arms of deceasedmale warriors. The rarely found adze (right) wasused to shape and trim wood and may havebelonged to a woodworker.
sxalTaSi aRmoCenili iaraRi rkinisaganaa damzadebuli. sabrZolo (marcxniv) culi da Subispiri (SuaSi) meomrebis samarxebSia aRmoCenili. rkinis eCo (marjvniv) xis dasamuSavebeli instrumentia da, savaraudod, durgals ekuTvnoda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor94
Extraordinary artistic ability and craftsmanshipare evident in these fragments of a ceramic lampfound at a site in Klde, Georgia. It features a reliefof Pegasus, the winged horse supposedly sired byPoseidon.
Tixis Wraqis es natexebi saqarTveloSi, kldis namosaxlarzea aRmoCenili da xelosnis maRal ostatobaze migviTiTebs.Mmasze mfrinavi raSi - pegasia gamosaxuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 95
This silver coin is believed to have been issuedby the Parthian King Gotarzes I, who ruled theParthian Empire from 95-90 BC. The Empire at itsgreatest extent included portions of Georgia, as wellas most of what is today the Middle East.
saqarTvelos teritoriaze gavrcelebuli parTiis mefe gotarzes vercxlis draqmebi (aRmoCenilia kldis namosaxlarze) am qveynis did gavlenaze metyvelebs. parTiis imperia Sua aziisa da iranis teritorias moicavda da kavkasiazec avrcelebda Tavis gavlenas.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor96
This carnelian stone from a silver ring found atKlde, Georgia, depicts three standing figureswearing long chitons or mantles folded at thewaist with ribbons. The figure on the right mightbe Demeter, goddess of the seasons, while thecentral figure might be Nemesis, the spirit ofdivine retribution.
kldis namosaxlarze napovni vercxlis beWdis sardionis intalioze gamosaxulia fexze mdgomi, grZel qitonebSi gamowyobili sami figura.marjvena gamosaxuleba weliwadis droebis RvTaeba demetra unda iyos, centrSi ki - RvTaebrivi SurisZiebis suli nemezida.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 97
Kartli (Iberian) Kingdom to the Late Classical Period (ca. 0 – 400 AD) In the first century AD the Kartli (Iberia) Kingdom was under the cultural influence of Rome and the parthian empires, later replaced by the Sassanian empire in 226 aD. evidence of close political and cultural relationships between rome and Kartli are well represented on a noteworthy stone inscription discovered at Mtskheta, which notes that the Roman Emperor Vespasian supported Mithridates, “the friend of the Caesars” and king “of the roman-loving Iberians,” in reconstructing the fortification of Mtskheta in 75 AD. During this period, a trade road running from India to Greece crossed the territory of Kartli. Kartli controlled the most important passes of the Central Caucasus, which meant it protected the central asian domains of rome from the invasion of aggressive nomadic tribes from the northern Caucasus. Consequently, the Romans profited from a strengthening of Kartli. The importance of the Kartli Kingdom to Rome grew in the 2nd century. During the reign of the roman emperor antoninus pius in the 2nd quarter of the 2nd century aD, King Pharsman II of Kartli visited Rome, where a statue was erected in his honor.
qarTlis (iberiis) samefo gvianantikur xanaSi (I – IV saukuneebi)
axali welTaRricxvis pirvel saukuneSi
qarTlis samefo romisa da parTiis
imperiebis kulturuli gavlenas
ganicdida. 226 wels parTiis nacvlad
Tanamedrove iranis teritoriaze
sasanuri irani Caenacvla. romisa da
qarTlis politikursa da kulturul
urTierTobaze metyvelebs mcxeTis
maxloblad aRmoCenili, 75 wliT
daTariRebuli, warwera, romlis mixedviT
irkveva, rom imperator vespasianes Tavisi
“megobrisaTvis”, qarTlis romaelTmoyvare
mefe miTridatesaTvis mcxeTis galavani
ganuaxlebia. am droisaTvis indoeTidan
saberZneTisaken mimavali gza qarTlis
teritorias kveTda. qarTls epyra
kavkasiis mniSvnelovani uReltexilebi
da Crdilo kavkasiis momTabare tomebis
moZraobis gakontroleba SeeZlo.
Sesabamisad, romi dainteresebuli iyo
qarTlTan kargi urTierTobebiT, rac misi
aziuri samflobeloebis CrdiloeTidan
dacvas niSnavda. meore saukuneSi qarTli
kidev ufro angariSgasawevi Zala gaxda.
II saukunis meore meoTxedSi qarTlis
mefe farsmani imperator antoninus piusis
miwveviT roms estumra, ris aRsaniSnavad
marsis velze misi qandakeba daidga.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor98
During the following two centuries, the new persian empire led by the Sassanid dynasty made control over the South Caucasus a main objective of its expansion. Kartli stood firmly with rome and opposed the persian empire. an impressive expression of its roman orientation was the declaration of Christianity as the state religion. During the 1st century aD, the apostle Saint andrew brought Christianity into Georgia, a small part of the population adopted it. Finally, in 326 AD, during the reign of King Mirian, a Cappadocian woman, Saint Nino converted Kartli to that religion. Many scholars argue that the Georgian alphabet was created in the 4th or 5th century aD to make religious scripture more accessible to Georgians. the oldest examples ofGeorgian writing are from two 5th century aD inscriptions, one found in a church in Bethlehem, and the second in the church of Bolnisi Sioni, currently in the southern part of Georgia. Although Georgian historical tradition attributed the invention of the Georgian alphabet to parnavaz I of Kartli in the 3rd century BC, there is no clear evidence of it prior to these inscriptions from the5th century aD. 6
Early Medieval Period (ca. 400 – 1000 AD)
Georgia’s medieval culture was greatly influenced by eastern Christianity and the Georgian Orthodox Apostolic Church, which promoted and often sponsored the creation of many works of religious devotion. During the 5th century aD, peter the Iberian (or peter of Iberia), a Georgian Orthodox saint and prominent figure in early Christianity, founded Bethlehem, the first Georgian monastery outside Georgia. During this period, Sassanian kings conquered the neighboring countries and appointed a viceroy in Kartli who promoted the teachings of Zoroaster. However, efforts to convert the common Georgian people were generally unsuccessful.
mesame saukunis ocian wlebSi
warmoSobilma axalma iranulma
saxelmwifom - sasanurma imperiam
Tavisi eqspansiis erT-erT samizned
kavkasia SearCia. Semdgomi ori saukunis
ganmavlobaSi qarTli ZiriTadad
romaul orientacias inarCunebda, ris
magaliTad 326 wels, mefe mirianis
zeobisas, qristianobis saxelmwifo
religiad gamocxadebac kmara.
qristianoba saqarTveloSi jer kidev
I saukuneSi Semovida, rodesac andria
pirvelwodebulma aqauri mosaxleobis
nawilis moqceva SeZlo. kapadokieli
qalwulis, wminda ninos qadagebas ki mirian
mefis gaqristianebac mohyva. mecnierebis
azriT, qarTuli anbani IV-V saukuneebSi
Seiqmna. misi uZvelesi nimuSebi cnobilia
V saukunis Zeglebidan – beTlemidan da
bolnisis sionidan. 6 miuxedavad imisa,
rom qarTuli istoriuli wyaroebi
qarTuli damwerlobis SemoRebas Zv.w. III
saukunis mefes, farnavaz I-s ukavSireben,
jer-jerobiT am mosazrebis dadastureba
ar xerxdeba da V saukuneze adreuli
damwerlobis nimuSi ar Cans.
adre Suasaukuneebi (V – IX saukuneebi)
Sua saukuneebis qarTul kulturaze
didi gavlena moaxdina qarTulma
marTlmadideblurma samociqulo
eklesiam, romlis wiaRSic warmoiSva
araerTi religiuri da saero naSromi.
V saukuneSi moRvawe wmindanis, petre
iberielis mier beTlemSi daaarsebuli
monasteri saqarTvelos gareT arsebuli
pirveli qarTuli monasteri iyo. am
droisaTvis iranis sasanianma Sahebma
mezobeli qveynebi daipyres da qarTlSi
TavianTi moxele gamoagzavnes, raTa mas aq
cecxlTayvanismcemloba gaevrcelebina.
miuxedavad maTi didi survilisa, es
mcdeloba warumatebeli aRmoCnda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 99
Table showing ancient and modern Georgianalphabets.
cxrilSi warmodgenilia Zveli da axali qarTuli anbanebi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor100
The Svetit*khoveli (“Living Pillar”) Cathedral inMtskheta, Georgia, was built in the 11th century ADon the site of an earlier church. Legend holds thatJesus’s robe was buried at this site.
sveticxovelis sakaTedro taZari mcxeTaSi XI saukuneSi aigo adreuli taZris adgilze. aq macxovris kvarTia dakrZaluli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 101
In the second half of the 5th century AD, King Vakhtang Gorgasali successfully unified the people of the transcaucasus against the Sassanid dynasty. he is associated with the founding of tbilisi. In the early 6th century AD, Vakhtang Gorgasali was killed in the struggle against the persians; by the end of the century Sassanian kings abolished the monarchy in Kartli, making it a Persian province. From the beginning of the 7th century AD, Byzantium predominated in western and eastern Georgia, until the arabs invaded the Caucasus. Arab invaders reached Kartli in the mid-7th century aD and forced its prince to recognize the Caliph as his suzerain. at the beginning of the 9th century AD, Prince Ashot Bagrationi, the first of a new, local Bagrationi Dynasty, established himself as hereditary prince of Iberia. 7
throughout the early Medieval period, Georgian Christian literature and architecture, mainly religious, flourished. Commendable examples of the cultural life of Georgia in this period are the holy Cross Church in Mtskheta (6th century aD), the monastic complex of Davit Gareji, and the oldest surviving work of Georgian literature, “the passion of Saint Shushanik” by Jakob Tsurtaveli, written between 476 and 483. In the 9th century aD, a prominent Georgian ecclesiastic, St. Grigol Khanzteli (Gregory of Khandzta) founded numerous monastic communities in Tao-Klarjeti in southwest Georgia. these monasteries and their scriptoria functioned as centers of knowledge for centuries and played an important role in the formation of the Georgian state.
V saukunis meore naxevarSi qarTlis mefe
vaxtang gorgasali, romelsac Tbilisis
daaarseba miewereba, saTaveSi Caudga
transkavkasiur antiiranul ajanyebas,
romelmac sruliad qarTli da somxeTi
moicva. VI saukunis dasawyisSi vaxtang
gorgasali iranelebis winaaRmdeg
brZolaSi daiRupa. amave saukuneSi
sasanianebma qarTlis samefos gauqmeba
moaxerxes, igi sparseTis provinciad aqcies
da aq marzpani daniSnes. VII saukunis
ocian wlebSi bizantiam saqarTvelos
dasavleTsa da aRmosavleT mxareebSi
nawilobrivi kontrolis daweseba
SeZlo, magram amave saukunis Sua xanSi
kavkasiaSi arabebi SemoiWrnen da qarTlis
erismTavari aiZules maTi qveSevrdomi
gamxdariyo. IX saukunis dasawyisSi aSot
bagrationma samxreT saqarTveloSi
damoukidebeli samTavro daaarsa da
bagrationTa samefo dinastias daudo
safuZveli. 7
adre Sua saukuneebi qarTuli qristianuli
literaturisa da xuroTmoZRvrebis
arnaxuli ayvavebis peiodia. am kulturuli
cxovrebis magaliTia sayovelTaod
cnobili jvris taZari da daviT garejis
monasteri. amave periods miekuTvneba
qarTuli mwerlobis uZvelesi, Cvenamde
moRweuli nawarmoebi, iakob curtavelis
“SuSanikis wameba”, romelic 476-483 wlebs
Soris daiwera. IX saukuneSi moRvaweobda
didi qarTveli sasuliero moRvawe
wminda grigol xanZTeli, romelmac
saqarTvelos samxreT-dasavleT nawilSi
- tao-klarjeTSi (amJamad TurqeTis
nawili) araerTi monasteri daaarsa.
saukuneebis ganmavlobaSiAam monastrebSi
iqmneboda mniSvnelovani sasuliero
da saero literatura. am monastrebs
saganmanaTleblo funqciac hqondaT.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor102
Excavations for the SCP project produced thisinscribed cross from the Atskuri winery.Archaeologists believe the inscription standsfor Tsminda and Giorgi (Saint George).
awyuris marnebis gaTxrebisas aRmoCenil am jvarze amokveTilia warwera - “wminda giorgi”.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 103
Georgia from 1000 to 1300 AD
In the late 10th and early 11th centuries AD, King Bagrat III brought the various principalities of Georgia together to form a united Georgian state. In 1121, near Didgori, King David IV defeated the coalition of Seljuk Turk troops. King David, often referred to as David the Builder, spared no effort to strengthen the country. he reformed the army, regenerated the economy, altered the activities of the church, and strengthened the governmental system. When he died in 1125, he left Georgia as a strong regional power.
saqarTvelo X – XIII saukuneebSi
X saukunis dasasrulsa da XI saukunis
dasawyisSi mefe bagrat mesamem
saqarTvelos samefo-samTavroebi
gaaerTiana. 1121 wels, mefe daviT meoTxem,
romelic aRmaSeneblis saxeliTaa
cnobili, didgoris maxloblad seljukTa
koaliciuri armia gaanadgura. man
samxedro da administraciuli reforma
Caatara, eklesiis roli CarCoebSi moaqcia,
gaajansaRa ekonomika da ganamtkica
saxelmwifiebrioba. gardacvalebis (1125)
Semdeg ki man STamomavlobas Zlieri
saqarTvelo dautova.
A partially reconstructed jar or cup recovered from asite near the Chivchavi Gorge in southern Georgia.
nawilobriv aRdgenili Tixis WurWeli WivWavis xeobidan.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor104
the most glorious sovereign of Georgia was Queen tamar (1184-1213), and in Georgia the period from the 12th-13th centuries aD is known as “the Golden age.” the country’s military-political strength relied on a diverse economy. the main centers of trade and handicraft were cities, including tbilisi, where approximately 100,000 people lived at the beginning of the 13th century. Centers of education, including the celebrated Gelati and Ikalto monasteries, created academies that taught philosophy, astronomy, mathematics, rhetoric, and music. a collection of Georgian historical essays entitled Kartlis Tskhovreba, created in the 12th century, chronicles the lives of authors from the 8th-12th centuries aD and became the authoritative description of the history of Georgia until the time when new essays were added to the original volume. One masterpiece of Georgian medieval literature is the romantic epic by Shota Rustaveli called “Knight in the Panther’s Skin.” Completed at the end of the 12th century, rustaveli’s poem is imbued with humanistic thoughts and feelings.
Georgia from the 1300 to 1800 AD Following the invasion of Mongols in the middle of the 13th century aD, the Georgian Kingdom began to disintegrate, coming under the domination of the Mongols by 1240. although King Giorgi V reunified the kingdom in the 14th century, his success was short-lived. During the subsequent century, the country suffered economic and political decline. In the end of the 14th century and in the beginning of the 15th centuries with ruthless violence, the tatars of tamerlane invaded Georgia eight times. In the 1460s the kingdom fractured into several states: the Kingdom of Kartli, the Kingdom of Imereti, Kingdom of Kakheti and the Principality of Samtskhe. In the 16th century Georgia became a battleground between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires. Prey to a succession of invaders at the turn of the
saqarTvelos erT-erT saxelovan da
gamorCeul mefed Tamar mefe (1184-
1213 ww.) iTvleba. XII-XIII saukuneebi ki
saqarTvelos istoriaSi oqros xanadaa
cnobili. qveynis samxedro-politikuri
Zliereba ganviTarebul ekonomikas
eyrdnoboda, hyvaoda vaWrobisa xelosnobis
centrebi – qalaqebi, maT Soris Tbilisic,
sadac XIII saukunis dasawyisisaTvis
100000 adamianze meti cxovrobda.
saganmanaTleblo centrebSi - iyalTosa
da gelaTis monastrebis saxelganTqmul
akademiebSi religiis garda iswavleboda
filosofia, astronomia, maTematika,
ritorika da musika. XII saukuneSi Seiqmna
qarTuli istoriuli wyaroebis krebuli
“qarTlis cxovreba”, romelic momdevno
xanebSi axal-axali naSromebiT ivseboda.
humanisturi idebiT gamsWvaluli, qarTuli
literaturis Sedevri, SoTa rusTavelis
poema “vefxistyaosani”, swored XII
saukunis dasasrulsaa Seqmnili.
saqarTvelo XIV – XVVII saukuneebSi
XIII saukunis 30-ian wlebSi saqarTveloSi
monRolebi SemoiWrnen da qveyana
daimorCiles. monRolTa batonobas qveynis
dayofac mohyva. XIV saukuneSi giorgi
brwyinvalem misi xelaxla gaerTianeba
da gaZliereba moaxerxa, magram misi
warmateba xanmokle aRmoCnda; qveyana
politikuradac da ekonomikuradac
dasustebuli iyo. XIV saukunis bolosa
da XV saukunis dasawyisSi saqarTveloSi
rvajer ilaSqra Temur lengma, romelmac
sastikad aaoxra qveyana. XV saukunis
60-ian wlebSi saqarTvelo sam samefod
(qarTli, kaxeTi da imereTi) da erT
samTavrod (samcxe) daiSala, rasac XVI
saukuneSi osmaleTisa da iranis imperiebs
Soris saqarTvelosaTvis brZola mohyva.
XVII saukuneSi osmalebTan da iranTan
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 105
17th century, the population of Tbilisi fell to no more than 10,000 people. By the 17th century, both eastern and western Georgia had sunk into poverty as the result of the constant warfare, which mainly involved battles for supremacy between the Ottoman and Safavid Empires. Georgian culture likewise suffered in the 15th-17th centuries. Nevertheless, there were distinguished examples of wall paintings, miniatures, embroidery, literature, and scientific discovery. It was against this backdrop that Georgian kings sought an ally in russia, which annexed the Georgian states in the 19th century.
Wine production and consumption have held an important place in Georgian culture and history for centuries. Written sources and archaeological material confirm that viticulture was an integral part of life during the Classical period, at which time the god of the vine, Dionysus, was a popular focus of worship. the myth of Dionysus relates that he travelled to strange lands where he taught men the culture of wine. the excavations uncovered jars dating to the 6th millennium BC at Shulaveri in southeastern Georgia, with a residue of wine still present on their inner surfaces. these jars provide some of the earliest evidence of the consumption of wine in ancient societies. Grape pips dating from the 7th-5th millennia BC found at the same site also suggest the very early cultivation of vineyards in ancient Georgia.
the tradition of viniculture continued even during the continuing clashes of armies during this period in Georgia. Wineries were some of the most interesting archaeological sites of the Medieval period to be excavated along the pipeline route in Georgia. In the vicinity of the village of atskuri in Samtskhe, where viticulture historically has been a major activity, archaeologists excavated seven wine cellars dating from the 10th-16th centuries aD. their construction and elements are similar to those found today in Georgian villages.
gauTavebeli omianobis gamo qarTuli
samefo-samTavroebi gaRaribda, Tbilisis
mosaxleoba ki 10000 adamianamde Semcirda.
qarTulma kulturam Zveli simaRleebi
ver SeinarCuna, magram, miuxedavad didi
gaWirvebisa, mainc iqmneboda gamorCeuli
freskebi da miniaturebi, iwereboda
mniSvnelovani mxatvruli da samecnierebo
naSromebi. qarTveli mefeebi mZime
mdgomareobidan gamosavals erTmorwmune
ruseTTan kavSirSi xedavdnen, magram
XIX saukuneSi am qveyanam qarTuli
saxelmwifoebi daipyro da gaauqma maTi
damoukidebloba.
Rvinis warmoeba da moxmareba
saukuneebis ganmavlobaSi qarTuli
kulturis mniSvnelovani komponenti iyo.
arqologiuri masalisa da werilobiTi
wyaroebis mixedviT, aq meRvineoba uZvelesi
droidan iyo ganviTarebuli. samxreT
saqarTveloSi, Sulaveris namosaxlarze,
aRmoCenili qvevrebi da yurZnis wipwebi
Zv.w. VII-VI aTaswleulebiT TariRdeba, rac
aq kulturuli jiSis - vazis moyvanaze
migviTiTebs.Aantikuri xanis saqarTveloSi
ki erT-erTi yvelaze gavrcelebuli Rvinis
RvTaeba - dionises kulti iyo.
meRvineobis tradiciebi xangrZlivi
saomari moqmedebebis drosac ar wydeboda.
milsadenebis teritoriaze warmoebuli
arqeologiuri gaTxrebidan sayuradReboa
samcxeSi, sof. awyurTan gamovlenili Sua
saukuneebis marnebi. samcxeSi mevenaxeoba
kargad iyo ganviTarebuli. aq aRmoCnda
X-XVI saukuneebis marnebi, romelTa msgavs
nagebobebs qarTul soflebSi dResac ki
SexvdebiT.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor106
turkey
Late Bronze Age to Iron Age (ca. 1500 – 400 BC)
Anatolia was known as the “Land of the Hatti” by the akkadians as early as the third millennium BC, after the Bronze Age people who dominated the region. The Hittites, an Indo-European-speaking people, replace the Hattis as rulers of Anatolia early in the second millennium BC. The Hittites adopted cuneiform writing from assyrian traders and assumed control of the trading colonies spread throughout anatolia. at its height, the Hittite Kingdom extended to Syria and Upper Mesopotamia, with its capital at Hattusa.
By the second half of the 13th century BC, the Hittite Kingdom was in decline and being pressured economically and politically by its neighbors. It fought the egyptians in the Levant under ramses II, saw the assyrians defeat its vassal state of Mittani in northern Syria, and faced incursions by the Sea peoples (a confederacy of seafaring raiders). In 1180 BC the Kingdom collapsed and devolved into a number of neo-Hittite city states, including Tabal in southeast Anatolia and the Mushki Kingdom in Cappadocia (both now part of turkey), Carchemish (on the frontier between turkey and Syria), and Kammanu (in south-central Anatolia). The end of the Hittite Kingdom caused established political, military, economic, and social relations to change throughout eastern anatolia, leading to the political and economic instability of the early Iron age.
An Early Iron Age Settlement at Büyükardıç Hill presented difficult conditions for settlers. agriculture in this mountainous area was difficult due to the high altitude (2,050m), and long distance from the creek valley below. Yet within this context of a hilltop overlooking a key transportation corridor in northeastern anatolia, a successful settlement appears to have flourished. This intriguing settlement yields insights into what was happening in this period of political unrest.
TurqeTi
gvianbrinjaodan rkinis xanamde A (Zv.w. 1500 – 400ww.)
Zv.w. III aTaswleulSi anatolia regionSi
uZlieresi xalxis - aqadelebisaTvis,
xaTis qveyanad iyo cnobili. indoevropeli
xeTebi meore aTaswleulis dasawyisidan
Caenacvlnen xaTebs da TavianTi
Zalaufleba anatoliaze gaavrceles.
xeTebma lursmuli damwerloba asureli
vaWrebisgan gadaiRes da kontroli
daaweses anatoliis savaWro qalaqebze.
Zlierebis zenitSi myofi xeTebis
samefo siriasa da zeda mesopotamiamde
vrceldeboda, maTi dedaqalaqi ki xaTusa
iyo.
Zv.w. XIII saukunis meore naxevarSi
xeTebis samefo dasustda da mezoblebma
Seviwroeba dauwyes. levantSi igi ebrZoda
ramzes III-is egviptes, asureTma daamarcxa
Tavisi vasaluri qveyana miTani, mas
ganuwyvetlad Tavs esxmodnen e.w zRvis
xalxebi. Zv.w. 1180 wels xeTebis samefo
daiSala ramdenime neoxeTur qalaq-
saxelmwifod, Tabalebis (axlandeli
samxreT-aRmosavleTi TurqeTi), musxebis
(axlandeli kapadokia), qarxemiSisa
(TurqeTisa da siriis sazRvarze) da
qamanus samefoebad (samxreTi centraluri
antolia). xeTebis samefos dacemam
anatoliaSi arsebuli politikuri,
samxedro, ekonomikuri da socialuri
cvlilebebi gamoiwvia da adrerkinis
xanis ekonomikur arastabilurobas daudo
safuZveli.
buiuqardiCis mTaze, sadac adrerkinis
xanis dasaxleba aRmoCnda, sakmaod
mkacri pirobebi iyo. didi simaRlis
(zRvis donidan 2050 metri) gamo soflis
meurneoba aq ver ganviTarda. igi
mdebareobda mTis mwvervalze, romelic
Crdilo-aRmosavleTi anatoliis
mniSvnelovan satransporto arterias
gadmohyurebda, rasac dasaxlebis
This grooved clay vessel uncovered at theBüyükardıç site contained iron residue and thetwo holes in its shoulder. The vessel, an artifactcommonly found at Bronze and Iron Age sites ineastern Anatolia, was likely used for heating andcreating metal objects.
buiuqardiCSi aRmoCenili Tixis es WurWeli rkinis widas Seicavs. mis mxarze ori xvrelia datovebuli. rogorc Cans, igi liTonis nivTebis dasamzadeblad gamoiyeneboda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 107
These classical-era pieces are part of the collectionof the Istanbul Archaeology Museum.
ntikuri xanis WurWlis es natexebi stambulis muzeumis koleqciidanaa.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor108
These cave dwellings, built into “fairy chimneys”near Goreme in Cappadocia in central Turkey,appear to have been occupied in the Late BronzeAge, around the time of the Hittite Empire.
kldeSi nakveTi es sacxovrisebi, romlebic centralur TurqeTSi, kapadokiaSi, goremes maxloblad, mdebareobs, gvianbrinjaos xanaSi, - xeTebis imperiis dros iyo dasaxlebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 109
Colak Abdi Pasha, the bey of the then-BayazitProvince, constructed the Ishak Pasha Palaceduring the late 17th century AD. The location is nowknown at Agri Province, Turkey, not far from MountArarat (Ağrı Dağı).
baiazeTis provinciis beim, abdil faSam ishak faSas sasaxle XVII saukunis dasasruls aago. igi Tanamedrove TurqeTSi, mTis araratis maxloblad mdebareobs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor110
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 111
The Library of Celsus at Ephesus, Turkey, wascompleted in 135 AD.
celsusis biblioTekis mSenebloba efesoSi (TurqeTi) 135 wels damTavrda
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor112
even though this region was a great crossroads for trade and culture, in some historic periods those relationships declined very significantly, and there was a pronounced shift in focus to self-sufficiency in preference to trade. Büyükardıç Hill would have been strategically significant to any ambitious King because it was situated at the center of crucial east-west trading routes that extended from the Araxes and Karasu valleys of the Caucasus, connecting persia to eastern anatolia. passing through this territory, given its high altitude would have only been possible from spring to autumn, as snowpacks blocked winter travel.
as the forces holding the region together (primarily the power of the Hittite Empire) collapsed, as major trade and population centers were abandoned or ruined in warfare, and as the movement of goods and people became a perilous undertaking, self-sufficient settlements like Büyükardıç emerged in easily defended mountainous areas. evidence of this change were uncovered in Büyükardıç: the discovery of a possible early Iron age metal working shop suggests that an attempt at a measure of self-sufficiency, and the ceramics found at the site appear to be mainly of local origin. the settlement’s location on a hilltop and the discovery of several metal arrow points also suggest its occupants were very concerned with defense, even though the site itself was unfortified. Yet despite Büyükardıç’s residents apparent desire for self-sufficiency, the turbulent political climate of the region forced smaller communities to occasionally form alliances in order to survive threats.
ganviTarebisaTvis unda Seewyo xeli.
arqeologiuri Zegli politikuri
arastabilurobis periodis Sesaxeb
gvawvdis informacias.
kulturebis gzajvaredinsa da vaWrobis
ganviTarebisaTvis xelsayreli
mdebareobis miuxedavad, zog periodSi
savaWro urTierTobebi Zalian mcirdeboda
da sazogadoeba TviTkmar cxovrebaze
gadadioda. buiuqardiCi mniSvnelovani
iyo TiToeuli ambiciuri mefisaTvis,
radgan igi ganTavsebuli iyo aRmosavleT_
dasavleTis savaWro gzis centrSi,
romelic araqsisa da yarasus xeobebidan
iwyeboda da sparseTsa da aRmosavleT
anatolias erTmaneTTan akavSirebda. am
gzis gavla didi simaRlis gamo zamTarSi
SeuZlebeli iyo.
rogorc ki regionis centaluri
xelisufleba (savaraudod, xeTebis
samefosi) moiSala, didi savaWro
dasaxlebebi dacarielda da omianobisas
daingra, saqonlis savaWrod gadatana ki
saxifaTo gaxda, buiuqardiCis msgavsi
TviTkmari dasaxlebebi kargad gamagrebul
adgilebze gaCnda. es cvlileba kargad
aisaxa buiuqardiCzec. adrerkinis xanis
rkinis samWedlosa da keramikuli masala
swored TviTkmarobaze migvaniSnebs.
miuxedavad imisa, rom dasaxlebas
galavani ar hqonda, mTis mwvervalze misi
mdebareoba da saisre wertilebis arseboba
migvaniSnebs, rom adgilobrivi mosaxleoba
Tavdacvas yuradRebiT ekideboda.
politikurma situaciam mcire Temebi
aiZula Tavdacvis mizniT mokavSireebi
eZebnaT da ufro didi gaerTianebebi
SeeqmnaT.
This riton, a metal wine vessel uncovered at the site of the Tasmasor Hill excavation in northeastern Turkey, depicts a camel, which highlights the trade connections between the Middle East and Central Asia.
es ritoni (liTonis yanwi) tamasoris mTaze, Crdilo TurqeTSia aRmoCenili. masze gamosaxuli aqlemi, savaraudod, axlo aRmosavleTsa da Sua azias Soris arsebuli savaWro urTierTobebis amsaxvelia.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 113
The abundance of coarse, handmade pottery without surface treatment found at Büyükardıç is typical of the early Iron age. however the 6,650 potsherds categorized into nineteen distinct ware groups uncovered at this site establishes the diverse range of stylistic and developmental attributes present onsite. Functionally, archaeologists have determined that some Büyükardıç potters used wheel-looms, while others were hand-made. In terms of design, Büyükardıç pottery displays red-slip, burnished, grooved, notched, incised, concentric circular impressions, rosette stamps, and painted decorations. Many of these features share commonalities with vessels found in Northwestern Iran, Georgia, armenia, and eastern thrace. thus providing further evidence that trade was prevalent at Büyükardıç.
Findings at Büyükardıç represent the transitional period from Late Bronze to early Iron age that occurred in anatolia during the 12th century and was probably built soon after the collapse of the Hittite capital. Most Early Iron Age settlements of the region were fortified and resettled following the collapse. the site is unique in that respect because it was not resettled, and thus provides crucial material evidence that has not been disturbed as drastically as related sites that were resettled.
During the 6th and 5th centuries BC, the persian achaemenid empire had spread outwards with increasing power from its capital at Susa. In the middle of the 1st millennium BC, the empire came to include all of anatolia and the southern Caucasus highlands. Sites excavated during the pipelines project at tetikom and tasmasor, situated along one of the ancient roads connecting central anatolia with the highlands to the east and the araxes river valley, have vastly enriched knowledge of the region under achaemenid rule during the Late Iron age.
buiuqardiCze aRmoCenili xeliT naZerwi,
zedapirdaumuSavebeli, uxeSi keramika
adrerkinis xanisaTvisaa damaxasiaTebeli.
Tixis WurWlis 6650 natexi, romelic 19
jgufad daiyo, sxvadasxva stilursa da
teqnikuri TaviseburebebiT xasiaTdeboda.
gairkva, rom zogi meTune keramikul
morgvs iyenebda, zogi ki WurWels xeliT
amzadebda. buiuqardiCis mTaze aRmoCenil
keramikaSi gvxvdeba wiTlad naprialebi
nimuSebi. zogierTi moxatuli iyo. gvxvdeba
nakawri, amoRaruli ornamenti, varduliani
Stampi, koncentruli amoRaruli xazebi.
bevr WurWels saerTo aqvs Crdilo iranis,
saqarTvelos, somxeTisa da aRmosavleT
Trakiis keramikasTan, rac gare samyarosTan
vaWrobis dasturad gamodgeba.
buiuqardiCis gaTxrebisas mopovebuli
arqeologiuri masala Zegls
gvianbrinjaodan, vidre adrerkinis xanaze
gardamavali periodiT, Zv.w. XII saukuniT
aTariRebs. es dasaxleba xeTebis imperiis
dedaqalaqis dacemis Semdeg swrafadve
augiaT. adre rkinis xanis dasaxlebebis
umetesoba galavanSemortymuli iyo da
imperiis dacemis Semdegaa dasaxlebuli.
Zegli imiTaa mniSvnelovani, rom aq
mopovebuli masala saSualebas iZleva
adrerkinis xanaze gardamavali mTeli
periodis uwyvet cxovrebas misi meSveobiT
gavadevnoT Tvali.
Zv.w. VI-V saukuneebSi aqemenidurma iranma,
romlis dedaqalaqi suza iyo, Tavisi
Zalaufleba kidev ufro ganamtkica
da samxreT kavkasiasa da antoliaSic
gabatonda. milsadenis teritoriis
Seswavlisas telikonsa da tasmasorSi
aRmoCenilma Zeglebma, romlebic
anatoliisa da araqsis xeobaze gamavali
uZvelesi gzebis maxloblad iyo, regionis
aqemenidebis droindeli yofis Sesaxeb
arsebuli codna mniSvnelovnad gaamdidra
da gaaRrmava.
The front side of this coin, found at Minnetpinari(where remains of a church with a basilica designwere uncovered), shows a lightly crowned anddraped bust facing right. On the reverse side, asoldier with helmet and armor is standing with hishead also facing right. He holds a lance in hisright hand and a shield resting on the ground inhis left hand.
mineTfinarSi, sadac bazilikuri eklesiis naSTebi aRmoCnda, napovni monetis Sublze, marjvena profilSi, gvirgviniani adamianis portretia gamosaxuli. monetis zurgze marjvniv mimarTuli, muzaradiani meomris gamosaxulebaa datanili, romelsac marjvena xelSi Subi uWiravs, marcxenaSi ki – fari.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor114
The Hagia Sophia in Istanbul contains examples ofthe finest mosaic art, including this famous mosaicdepicting Jesus Christ.
stambulis aia sofias taZarSi brwyinvale mozaikuri panoebia daculi, maT Sorisaa macxovris sayovelTaod cnobili gamosaxulebac.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 115
perhaps the longest continuously inhabited site found during the archaeological excavations during this project was tasmasor. Discovered at tasmasor hill, and located on the erzurum plain of Northeastern turkey, tasmasor was of great geopolitical importance as competing empires vied for dominance in the ancient world. the erzurum and Pasinler Plains separated by the Kargapazari mountain range form a natural pass just south of tasmasor connecting two important regions of Northeast anatolia, as well as allowing access from anatolia into the Caucasus and Iranian steppe. Control of this gateway, known as the Deveboynu pass, was crucial for east-west trade connections in anatolia, and was one of the few passable routes available for Iron age empires.
Guided by Assoc. Prof. S. Yücel Şenyurt, the excavation of tasmasor hill initially uncovered a medieval housing complex dating to the 12th century aD, which contained minimal material remains. In the midst of unearthing this structure, Şenyurt’s team chanced upon two pit burials that displayed characteristics common to this region during the Iron Age. Soon after structural foundations made from river stones were found accompanying the previously discovered graves.
Unfortunately the original provenance of artifacts discovered at tasmasor has been lost as the natural stratigraphy of this site was unsettled from continuous reoccupation. this hindered the ability for Şenyurt and his team to accurately cross-reference material found at tasmasor with that of neighboring sites believed to share cultural characteristics.
samSeneblo proeqtis mimdinareobisas
Seswavlili ZeglTa Soris uwyveti da
xangrZlivi arsebobiT tamasori gamoirCeva.
igi mdebareobs Crdilo-aRmosavleT
TurqeTSi, erzrumis vakeze, tamasoris
mTaze. erTmaneTTan dapirispirebuli
imperiebisaTvis mas mniSvnelovani
geopolitikuri mdebareoba hqonda.
erzrumisa da fasinleris vakeebs hyofs
yarafazaris qedi. swored tamasoris
maxlobladaa devenbois uReltexili,
romelic anatoliis am or mniSvnelovan
mxares akavSirebs. am gziT anatoliidan
SesaZlebelia kavkasiaSi da iranis
stepebSi gadasvla. karibWis kontroli
gadamwyveti iyo anatoliis aRmosavleTsa
da dasvleTs Soris vaWrobaSi. rkinis
xanaSi arsebuli mcirericxovani
gadasasvlelebTagan igi erT-erTi
mniSvnelovani iyo da mis dasaufleblad
imperiebi ibrZodnen.
P
prof. iusuf senuirTis xelmZRvanelobiT
Catarebulma arqeologiurma gaTxrebma
tamasoris mTaze Sua saukuneebis, kerZod
XII saukunis, sacxovrebeli kompleqsi
gamoavlina. igi mcire raodenobis
arqeologiur masalas Seicavda. erTi
nagebobis Seswavlisas rkinis xanis
samarxebi gamoCnda, mogvianebiT ki, amave
periodis nagebobebic gamovlinda.
tamasorSi aRmoCenili artefaqtebi
metwilad maTi Tavdapirveli adgilidan
daZruli iyo. imis gamo, rom teritoriis
xangrZlivi periodis dausaxleblobam
stratigrafiuli monacemebi ar gamoavlina,
amitom senuirTis gundma maxloblad
arsebuli arqeologiuri Zeglebis
masalebi safuZvlianad Seiswavla.
These Byzantine coins found at Tasmasor Hill, located in the historically strategic Erzurum Plain of northeastern Turkey, were likely in circulation until 1070-1080 AD, when the Seljuk Empire assumed political authority of the region. The coins show Jesus Christ with a cross on his head and a nimbus of single-point ornaments on his arms, raising his right hand as if sanctifying, and holding the Bible in his left hand.
es bizantiuri monetebi aRmoCenilia tamasoris mTaze, romelic Crdilo-aRmosavleT TurqeTSi, erzurumis vakeze mdebareobs. am adgils istoriulad strategiuli mniSvneloba hqonda. monetebi mimoqcevaSi unda yofiliyo 1070-1080 wlebamde. monetebze gamosaxulia ieso qriste. mas Tavze Saravandi adgas, romelsac jvris ornamenti amkobs; marjvena xeli kurTxevad aqvs apyrobili, xolo marcxena xelSi biblia uWuravs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor116
The Hellenistic Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Periods (ca. 400 BC – 700 AD) the hellenistic period that began around the time of Alexander the Great greatly influenced the regions of anatolia lying along the pipeline corridor. The Battle of Issus—the second of three great battles between the Alexander’s Macedonian army and the persian achaemenids—was fought in 333 BC on a plain approximately 30 kilometers from Ceyhan, the terminus of the BtC pipeline. emperor Darius III personally led the persian forces at Issus. although the Macedonians were heavily outnumbered and cut off from their supply lines, they crushed the persians, forcing Darius to flee. He consolidated his army for the subsequent Battle of Gaugamela, where the Achaemenids experienced their final, crucial defeat.
Within a few years of these triumphs, alexander was dead, and Macedonian General Seleucus established his own dynasty in the parts of alexander’s domain he then acquired. the Seleucid empire lasted for several hundred years and established control over much of the South Caucasus and eastern anatolia. It proved to be a fascinating melting pot of leadership from the Macedonian and Greco-Mediterranean worlds, of indigenous cultures, and of political hierarchies inherited from the achaemenids. the resulting hellenistic culture combined elements from east (persian/achaemenid) and west (Greco/Mediterranean). It was expressed in new forms of art and architecture, an expanding pantheon of gods, and the spread of a culturally distinctive style in ceramics and other crafts. Powerful Mediterranean influences also spread throughout eastern anatolia and the South Caucasus during the hellenistic period. roman control of the region reinforced economic and social connections there.
elinisturi, berZnuli, romauli da bizantiuri periodebi (Zv.w. 400 – ax.w.700ww.)
elinisturi xana aleqsandre makedonelis
mier aziaze gavlenis damyarebis
droidan daiwyo. 333 wels ifsusis vakeze,
romelic jeihanidan 30 kilometriTaa
daSorebuli, aleqsandre makedonelisa
da aqemeniduri imperiis armiebs Soris
brZola gaimarTa. imperatori darios
III Tavad xelmZRvanelobda sparsTa
jars. miuxedavad imisa, rom makedonelebi
damxmare jars mowyvetilebi iyvnen, maT
sparselebi gaanadgures, dariosma ki
gaqceviT uSvela Tavs. dariosma kvlav
Seagrova jari da momdevno brZola
gavgamelasTan gamarTa, rasac sparselTa
saboloo damarcxeba mohyva.
didi gamarjvebebidan ramdenime weliwadSi
aleqsandre gardaicvala da makedonelma
generalma selevkosma sakuTari dinastia
daaarsa. selevkidebis imperia ramdenime
aswleulis ganmavlobaSi arsebobda da
Zalauflebas kavkasiis did nawilsa da
anatoliaze avrcelebda. es saxelmwifo
makedonuri, berZnul-makedonuri da
aqemeniduri samyaroebis tradiciebs
aerTianebda, ris Sedegad warmoSobili
elinisturi kultura aRmosavluri
da dasavluri kulturebis nazavs
warmoadgenda. es siaxle gamoixateboda
mxatvrobasa da arqiteqturaSi,
RmerTebis mravalferovan panTeonSi,
agreTve keramikis warmoebisa da sxva
xelobebis ganviTarebaSi. elinistur
xanaSi xmelTaSuazRvispireTis gavlena
aRmosavleT anatoliasa da samxreT
kavkasiazec gavrcelda. romis dapyrobebma
regionSi ekonomikursa da socialur
sferoSi ZalTa axali gadanawileba
warmoSva.
milsadenebis proeqtis mimdinareobisas
Seswavlili ori Zegli - ieqeroni da
ziareTuiu elinistursa da romaul xanebs
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 117
two turkish sites researched during the pipelines project, Yuceoren and Ziyaretsuyu, represent the hellenistic and the roman periods respectively. the necropolis of Yuceoren, located near the pipeline terminus at Ceyhan, contains numerous tombs cut into the bedrock, where portions of a sarcophagus and articles used to treat the dead were found. The settlement site of Ziyaretsuyu, near Sivas in northeastern anatolia, contains the remains of a few domestic structures, painted ceramics and amphorae (large storage vessels), and a terracotta figurine that provides a fine example of classical traits. (Both sites are discussed in greater detail in the next chapter.)
During the 3rd century aD, the roman empire began to encounter a range of challenges that led to its decline. these challenges included economic decline, invasions by “barbarians,” and a general decay of the social fabric that had been a major source of the empire’s appeal to its inhabitants. By the last decades of the century, the leadership in rome was desperate for a way to maintain control of its sprawling empire. to this end, emperor Diocletian divided rule of the empire’s western and eastern parts between himself and a co-emperor, Maximian. Less than a decade later, they added two additional, junior emperors. these four rulers, the Tetrarchy, held court in different parts of the empire.
After Diocletian’s death in the early 4th century AD, years of conflict erupted as various aspirants vied to rule the empire. By 312 aD, Constantine emerged as the most powerful, although the conflicts lasted until 324, when he gained complete authority over the empire.
miekuTvneba. ieqeronis samarovani jeihanis
terminalTan axlos mdebareobs. aq
dedaqanSi CaWrili akldamebia aRmoCenili.
Crdilo-aRmosavleT anatoliaSi,
sivasiis maxloblad mdebare ziareTuius
namosaxlarze mikvleulia Senobebis
naSTebi, moxatuli keramika, amforebi da
terakotis figura. momdevno TavSi orive
Zegli ufro detaluradaa aRwerili.
ax.w. III saukuneSi romis imperia didi
gamowvevebis winaSe idga, ramac mogvianebiT
misi dacema ganapiroba. saxelmwifo
mmarTvelobis krizisi, ekonomikis
daqveiTeba da barbarosebis Semosevebi
am procesis umniSvnelovanesi nawili
iyo. saukunis bolo aTwledSi romis
xelmZRvaneloba TavganwirviT cdilobda
win aRdgomoda imperiis daSlas. am
mizniT imperatorma diokletianem Tavis
TanammarTvel maqsimians gaunawila
Zalaufleba da imperia or nawilad _
aRmosavleTad da dasavleTad gahyo.
aTi wlis Semdeg maT kidev ori, umcrosi
Tanaimperatori daemataT. oTxi mmarTveli
(tetrarqia) imperiis sxvadasxva mxaridan
ganagebda qveynis saqmeebs.
IV saukunis dasawyisSi, diokletianes
gardacvalebis Semdeg, taxtisaTvis brZola
wlebis ganmavlobaSi grZeldeboda,
romelSiac sabolood, 312 wels,
konstantinem gaimarjva. miuxedavad amisa,
konfliqti sabolood mxolod 324 wels
amoiwura, rodesac man Tavisi Zalauflebis
gavrceleba mTeli imperiis teritoriaze
SeZlo.
The excavation of this small room at the Roman-erabath site of Kayranlıkgözü revealed the heated floorsystem known as a hypocaust.
romauli abanos (kariranlikgozi) am mcire nawilSi hipokausti, anu iatakis gaTbobis sistema aRmoCnda.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor118
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 119
The Hagia Sophia was built in Constantinopleunder the direction of Emperor Justinian during the6th century AD. It became a mosque after OttomanSultan Mehmet II conquered Constantinople. Afterserving for nearly 500 years as Istanbul’s principalmosque, it was converted into a museum in 1935. aia sofias taZari konstantinopolSi imperator iustinianes uSualo xelmZRvanelobiT VI saukuneSi aigo. rodesac qalaqi otomanebma aiRes, sulTan mehmed II–is brZanebiT igi meCeTad gadakeTda. 500 wlis Semdeg, 1935 wels, aq muzeumi gaixsna.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor120
Constantine was one of the pivotal figures of the first millennium AD. A convert to Christianity, he eventually established the precedence of this religion within the empire. he also moved the seat of his rule from rome to Byzantium on the Bosphorus and renamed it Constantinople (nowIstanbul), thus shifting the Empire’s center of gravity to the eastern Mediterranean. Over time, the eastern part of the roman empire came to be known as the Byzantine empire. During the5th and 6th centuries aD, the eastern empire grew in power and splendor, reaching its height during the 6th century aD under the reign of emperor Justinian, who introduced the JustinianCode, attempted to reestablish his authority over the western parts of the empire, and presided over great artistic achievements such as the construction of the hagia (or aya) Sophia (Church of the holy Wisdom).
the Byzantine empire dominated much of the eastern Mediterranean for several centuries, at its height controlling territory from Saudi arabia to the Balkans, including all of anatolia, and spreading the Christianity of the Byzantine Orthodox Church throughout the region.
konstantine I aTaswleulis
umniSvnelovanesi mmarTveli iyo. mis
dros imperiis oficialur religiad
qristianoba gamocxadda. man dedaqalaqi
romidan bizantiumSi gadaitana da mas
konstantinopoli uwoda. amgvarad, imperiis
centrma aRmosavleTisaken gadmoinacvla.
droTa ganmavlobaSi romis imperiis
aRmosavleT nawils bizantia daerqva.
V-VI saukuneebSi aRmosavleTi imperia
Zlierdeboda da VI saukuneSi, imperator
iustinianes zeobaSi, zenits miaRwia.
iustinianem gamosca kanonTa krebuli,
romelic iustinianes kodeqsis saxeliTaa
cnobili, man scada Tavisi Zalufleba
dasavleTiTac gaevrcelebina. mis dros
aigo aia sofiis (wminda sibrZnis)
brwyinvale taZaric.
ramdenime saukunis ganmavlobaSi
bizantiis imperia aRmosavleT
xmelTaSuazRvispireTis udides
nawils flobda da saudis arabeTidan
balkaneTamde teritorias akontrolebda.
imperiam mTel regionSi qristianoba
gaavrcela.
This partially broken cigarette holder, discovered atAkmezer, Turkey, is made from meerschaum, a softwhite mineral.
TurqeTSi, akmezarSi aRmoCenili es yalioni TeTri mineralisaganaa damzadebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 121
Eventually, however, the Empire lost ground, first to the incursions of the arabs and later the turks. Islamic armies poured out of Arabia in the 7th century aD, capturing the Levant, Mesopotamia, and egypt within a few years. By late in the century, a boundary between the Byzantine empire and arab world was established that lasted well into the 11th century aD, running from west of Ceyhan through eastern anatolia to the highlands west of Azerbaijan. By the 8th century AD, the Abbasid Caliphate had established a powerful capital at Baghdad, from which it led the Muslim world.
archaeological excavations along the pipeline corridor provided several glimpses into the world of eastern anatolia during the Byzantine empire. Most of the sites are domestic in nature—simple villages and communities of ordinary people who probably went about their daily lives knowing little about the Byzantine Empire or the emperor in Constantinople. two sites however at Kayranlikgözü (a public bath complex) and Minnetpinari, provide glimpses of the more public side of the empire.
One of the more fascinating sites along the pipeline corridor is the roman period bath complex located at Kayranlıkgözü of Turkey’s Andırın district. Tucked in between the Kayranlık mountain range on one side and 12th century aD Geben Castle on the other, this complex likely dates from the 2nd to 5th centuries aD doesn’t appear to have many structural relatives. two notable exceptions exist in the archaeological record from this period however, one in Greece and the other in Istanbul. Yet despite similar architectural elements with other contemporary sites in Italy, Greece, North africa, Europe and Anatolia, Kayranlıkgözü’s design and construction appears to be unique with respect to baths constructed in roman-controlled areas. this raises some interesting questions regarding the nature of roman rule, especially surrounding the apparent allowance for local influences in architecture at sites such as Kayranlıkgözü. Furthermore, how did aspects of local customs and transregional trade interact?
miuxedavad Tavisi siZlierisa, droTa
ganmavlobaSi bizantiis imperia
teritoriebs kargavda. VII saukuneSi,
arabebma sul ramdenime weliwadis
ganmavlobaSi levanti, siria da egvipte
daikaves. VII saukunis dasasruls
bizantiasa da arabeTs Soris sasazRvro
xazi jeihanis dasavleTiT, aRmosavleT
anatoliasa da azerbaijanis mTianeTze
gadioda, rac XI saukunemde SenarCunda.
VII saukuneSi abasidebis saxelmwifos
dedaqalaqi baRdadi gaxda, saidanac
islamuri samyaro imarTeboda.
E
milsadenebis gaswvriv warmoebuli
arqeologiuri gaTxrebisas warmoCinda
bizantiis imperiis nawilis - aRmosavleT
anatoliis mosaxleobis yofis ramdenime
mniSvnelovani aspeqti. Zeglebis
umravlesoba dasaxlebaa – esaa ubralo
soflebi, sadac ise cxovrobdnen, rom
bizantiis imperiisa da imperatoris
Sesaxeb TiTqmis araferi icodnen. ori
arqeologiuri Zegli – qairanliqgozu
(abanos kompleqsi) da mineTfinari
gacilebiT met informacias iZleva
imperiis sazogadoebrivi cxovrebis
Sesaxeb.
milsadenebis derefanSi arsebul
ZeglTagan erT-erTi mniSvnelovania
romauli xanis abanos kompleqsi, romelic
ardinis raionSi, qairanliqgozuSi,
mdebareobs. igi erTi mxridan qairanliqis
mTebiT, meore mxridan ki XII saukunis
cixesimagriTaa garSemortymuli. Zegli II-V
saukuneebiT TariRdeba da mSeneblobis
teqnikiTaa gansxvavebuli. arqeologiuri
gaTxrebisas msgavsi nagebobebi mxolod
organ - saberZneTsa da konstantinopolSia
aRmoCenili. miuxedavad imisa, rom
italiaSi, saberZneTSi, Crdilo afrikaSi,
evropasa da anatoliaSi aRmoCenil,
amave periodiT daTariRebul, msgavsi
daniSnulebis Zeglebze analogiuri
arqiteqturuli detalebi gvxvdeba,
qairanliqgozus dizaini da konstruqcia
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor122
As is common at bath sites, Kayranlıkgözü lacked substantial material remains necessary for a concise archaeological analysis. Oftentimes bath complexes will not uncover material remnants, however in the case of Kayranlıkgözü two coins were discovered. Inscriptions observed on these coins suggest that the initial construction of this complex dates to the early 4th century AD. Additionally further metal and glass finds corroborate this estimate.
Minnetpinari, a roman period church located near the Turkish village of Başdoğan, provides some evidence of religious practice in eastern anatolia. Only the western portion of the basilica church was excavated, yet the church appears to have been built in three distinct phases. Initially the church was constructed atop a three nave floor plan. the ceiling, supported by large cylindrical pillars, magnificently displayed connecting archways around the church. a second, lesser phase of construction elevated the basem*nt up to the same level as the main church floor. Finally a small chapel was attached to the southern nave to complete the church renovations.
the excavations at Minnetpinari uncovered a total of 65 tomb burials. the majority of these burials contained adult males, and with the exception of two graves, no artifacts were found in Minnetpinari’s tombs. Most tombs had a very distinctive arrangement, where two or more small stones were situated around the head of the deceased. Gender and age also factored into the position of the body. Skeletons laying on their backs was ubiquitous to all of the honored dead, however the hands of male skeletons were crossed at their waist with their hands cupping their elbows. Conversely, female skeletons crossed their hands on top of their chests. Children were positioned with their right hand on their chest with the left hand supporting the right hand’s elbow. the elderly also had their own style as their left hand held the right hand close to the shoulder and right hand supports the left hand’s elbow (pudicita type). these distinctive burial positions were quite common in Christian communities not exclusive to eastern anatolia.
romaul samyaroSi unikaluria. Zeglze
Catarebulma gaTxrebma arqeologebis
winaSe ramdenime mniSvnelovani kiTxva
gaaCina. daisva sakiTxi regionSi romauli
mmarTvelobis xasiaTisa da adgilobrivi
arqiteqturuli tradiciebis gavlenis
Sesaxeb; Sesaswavlia adgilobriv
tradiciebze transregionaluri vaWrobis
Sedegebis gavlenac.
abanoebis Seswavlisas, rogorc wesi,
arc Tu ise bevri arqeologiuri masala
vlindeba. asea qairanliqgozuSic, magram
aq mopovebuli ori monetis saSualebiT
moxerxda Zeglis mSeneblobis TariRis
– IV saukunis dasawyisis gansazRvra.
aq aRmoCenili arqeologiuri masala
aRniSnul TariRs ar ewinaaRmdegeba.
romauli xanis abano mineTfinari
mdebareobs sofel baSdoRanis maxloblad.
aq arsebuli bazilikis mxolod erTi,
dasavleTi, nawili gaiTxara. gamoirkva,
rom taZari orjeraa gadakeTebuli.
Tavdapirvelad, igi samnaviani eklesiis
gegmiT aSenda. TaRovani Weri did
cilindrul svetebs eyrdnoboda. Semdgom
saZirkveli mTavari eklesiis iatakamde
amaRlda. dasasrul, samxreT navs mcire
samlocvelo miuSenes.
mineTfinaris gaTxrebisas 65 samarxi
gamovlinda. dakrZalulTa umetesoba
zrdasruli mamakaci iyo. samarxeuli
inventari mxolod orSi aRmoCnda.
samarxTa umetesobaSi micvalebulebis
TavebTan ori-sami patara qva ido;
dakrZalulTa pozas ki maTi asaki da
sqesi ganapirobebda. yvela micvalebuli
zurgze iwva, mamakacebs idayvebi hqondaT
gadajvaredinebuli da xelebi welze
edoT. qalebs xelebi mkerdze hqondaT
gadajvaredinebuli, bavSvebs ki marjvena
xeli mkerdze edoT, marcena - marjvenis
idayvze. moxucebs marcxena xeliT
marjvena mklavi eWiraT, marjvena xeliT
ki - marcxena idayvi. dakrZalvis es wesebi
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 123
Numismatic material found at Minnetpinari has helped to piece together the political history and trade networks of eastern anatolia at this time. In anatolia during the early Medieval period, local kings and rulers habitually reissued new coins in their own honor during both their political inauguration and sometimes throughout their reign. Minnetpinari is an interesting site in that it contains coins from multiple empires and time periods. Of the 46 total coins found at the site, 28 belonged to the 13th century Kilikia Kingdom, 4 to the later Islamic period and 4 to the Christian roman empire (contemporary to the occupation of the church). all point to the longevity ofMinnetpinari and the diverse political climate of anatolia through time.
The Turkish World after 700 AD In the early 12th century aD, the Seljuk turks began their incursions into central anatolia. turkic peoples had come from Central asia, where they were the dominant cultural group by the 6th century AD. By the mid-7th century AD, the Göktürks (a nomadic confederation of Turks) built an empire that included the South Caucasus, but dynastic infighting led to its collapse. the Seljuks, a clan within the nomadic Oghuz peoples of the aral steppes, established a dynasty that came to dominate the tribes that had moved into the abbasid Caliphate during the 9th and 10th centuries aD. at first employed by the Caliphate as slaves and soldiers, the Seljuks gradually assumed greater authority as they adopted Islam, which they injected with new energy. By the 11th century aD, the Seljuks had wrested control of Mesopotamia and eastern anatolia from the Caliphate and advanced to persia, before turning their attention to the Byzantine empire to the west.
mxolod aRmosavleT anatoliisaTvis ar
iyo damaxasiaTebeli, igi aseve farTod
iyo gavrcelebuli mTel qristianul
samyaroSi.
mineTfinaris numizmaturi masala
aRmosavleT anatoliis politikuri
istoriisa da vaWrobis Sesaxeb damatebiT
informacias iZleva; adreuli Sua
saukuneebis anatoliis mefeebi da
mmarTvelebi axal monetebs xan mefed
kurTxevisas, zogierT SemTxvevaSi ki, mTeli
zeobis ganmavlobaSi, sakuTar saxelze
Wridnen. mineTfinari am mxriv saintereso
Zeglia, sadac sxvadasxva imperiisa da
sxvadasxva drois monetebia mopovebuli.
aq aRmoCenili 46 monetidan 28 kilikiis
samefos XIII saukunis monetaa, 4 islamuri
periodisaa, oTxic - eklesiis Tanadrouli,
romis qristianuli periodisa. yvela
maTgani mineTfinaris dasaxlebis
xangrZliv arsebobasa da gansxvavebul
politikur mdgomareobaze migviTiTebs.
Turanuli samyaro VII saukunis Semdeg
XII saukunis dasawyisidan Turq-
seljukebma anatoliaSi damkvidreba
daiwyes. Turanuli modgmis xalxebi
Sua aziidan daiZrnen, sadac isini VI
saukuneSi umravlesoba iyo. VII saukunis
Sua xanebSi momTabare Turqebis -
gioqTurqebis konfederaciam Seqmna imperia,
magram igi dinastiuri dapirispirebebis
gamo daiSala. Turq oRuzebis Sto
- seljukebi Tavdapirvelad aralis
stepebSi cxovrobdnen. maT Camoayalibes
Zlieri dinastia, romelic IX-X saukuneebSi
saTaveSi Caudga abasidebis saxalifoSi
macxovrebel Turanul tomebs.
Tavdapirvelad isini saxalifoSi monebisa
da jariskacebis movaleobas asrulebdnen,
islamis miRebis Semdeg ki dawinaureba
daiwyes. XI saukuneSi maT mesopotamiasa
da aRmosavleT anatoliaze daamyares
kontroli, mogvianebiT ki bizantias
daupirispirdnen.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor124
In 1071, at the Battle of Malazgirt, the Seljuks, led by alp arslan, defeated a Byzantine army in eastern anatolia and captured the emperor, Romanos IV Diogenes. (Although freed soon thereafter, he was deposed.) Within a few decades, the Seljuks had driven the Byzantine forces to the Sea of Marmara, and exerted turkic dominance across much of anatolia.
the Seljuk empire had an important historical role in the dissemination of the Islamic faith and in its defense against anti-Islamic crusaders from europe. It lost its dominance over anatolia, although it remained a force in Mesopotamia and anatolia until its final collapse under pressure from the Mongols in 1243. the Seljuk Sultanate of rûm, a fragment of the dismembered empire, controlled a large part of central and eastern Anatolia as far as Lake Van until the end of the 13th century—in its latter years, as a vassal state to the Mongol empire. the Sultanate, which ruled for over 200 years, helped to establish the turkish character of the region, and created a system of han or caravanserai (roadside commercial buildings along trade routes) that fostered commerce from central asia to the Mediterranean.
For 350 years, the Byzantines managed to fight off the Seljuk turks. By the 14th century aD, however, a new force among the Seljuks’ successors had emerged, marking the beginning of a new era. anatolian beyliks (turkic states ruled by beys) gained power as the Sultanate of rûm declined. One of the beyliks, led by Osman I of the Osmanoğlu, spread its power across western anatolia, forming the basis for the Ottoman empire. During the 14th century, Osman’s descendants gained greater control of anatolia. after their victory against the Byzantines at the Battle of adrianople in 1365, they moved their capital to adrianople in what is now the european part of turkey. this defeat isolated Constantinople from the rest of europe and positioned the Ottomans to move against Greece and the Balkans.
1071 wels maT alf arslanis
winamZRolobiT, manaskertTan, bizantiuri
armia daamarcxes da imperatori romanoz
diogene Seipyres (man tyveobidan gaqceva
moaxerxa, magram taxtidan gadaayenes).
ramdenime weliwadSi seljukebma bizantia
marmarilos zRvamde Seaviwroves da
anatoliaSi Turquli batonoba daamyares.
jvarosnulma laSqrobam da seljukebs
Soris dawyebulma dinastiurma omebma
bizantiis imperias amosunTqvis saSualeba
misca; seljukebma anatoliaSi pirveloba
dakarges, Tumca, kvlavac rCebodnen
angariSgasawev Zalad. 1243 wels monRolTa
Semosevam seljukTa saxelmwifo
sabolood gaanadgura. daSlili Turquli
imperiis nawils - rumis sasulTnos, XIII
saukunis dasasrulamde aRmosavleT
anatoliis mniSvnelovani nawili eWira,
magram Semdeg igi monRolebis vasaluri
saxelmwifo gaxda. rumis sasulTnom,
romelic 200 wlis ganmavlobaSi arsebobda,
regionSi Turquli cxovrebis wesi
daamkvidra qarvaslebis sistema Seqmna, rac
Sua aziidan xmelTaSua zRvamde vaWrobis
ganviTarebas uwyobda xels.
350 wlis ganmavlobaSi bizantia seljukTa
Semotevebs uZlebda, magram XIV saukuneSi
gaCnda axali Zala, romelmac anatoliis
beiliqebi (Turquli samTavroebi,
romlebsac beebi marTavdnen) Seqmna.
anatoliurma beiliqebma Zalaufleba
rumis sasulTnos dacemisTanave moipoves.
erT-erTma beiliqma, romelsac osman I
meTaurobda, dasavleT anatoliis nawili
Caigdo xelSi, riTac otomanTa imperias
daudo safuZveli. XIV saukuneSi misma
STamomavlebma anatoliis didi nawili
daimorCiles. 1365 wels, adrianopolTan
bizantielebis damarcxebis Semdeg, maT
dedaqalaqi Tanamedrove TurqeTis
evropuli nawilSi, adrianopolSi,
gadaitanes. am marcxma konstantinopoli
danarCeni evropisagan izolaciaSi
moaqcia da otomanebs saberZneTisa da
balkaneTisaken gauxsna gza.O
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 125
Within two decades, the Ottomans took control over much of the southern Balkans. this Ottoman expansion was halted in 1402, following defeat at the hands of the Mongol warlord tamerlane at the Battle of ankara, and for a time, the Ottomans were vassals of the Mongols.
the expansion of the Ottoman empire resumed under the Sultans Mehmet I, Murad II, and Mehmet II. It was under Mehmet II, known as the Conqueror that Constantinople finally fell to the Ottomans in 1453 aD, bringing the Byzantine empire to a close. Mehmet II continued the expansion into the Balkans. at the time of his death in 1481, the Ottomans had an army in Italy marching on rome. Under Selim I and Suleiman I (known as the Magnificent), the empire came to include much of the Middle east and the Levant, egypt, and North africa. In 1529, Suleiman pushed westward and laid siege to Vienna. Although Vienna’s defenders held out against the Ottomans, the attack underscored the threat that a powerful Ottoman empire posed to europe, a threat that lasted for three more centuries, as the rising powers of the West faced off against the Ottomans in numerous battles from Gibraltar to the Black Sea. the result is the patchwork of numerous Christian and Islamic communities that co-exist in the region today. the Ottomans were dominant over a vast area and continued to control much of the Mediterranean region until World War I. today turkic peoples can be found from anatolia through central asia to western China. In anatolia, turkish society combined elements of the classical and Byzantine worlds with eastern cultural influences.
two archaeological sites found along the pipelines corridor in turkey relate to the Ottoman period. Cilhoroz and akmezar are located near erzincan in northeastern anatolia, not far from the great trade routes that passed through erzurum. Both sites date from the final years of Byzantine control of the region and illustrate the simple, rural side of anatolian life during the Middle ages.
oc weliwadSi otomanebma samxreT
balkaneTis mniSvnelovani nawili daikaves.
otomanebis winsvla 1402 wels SeCerda,
rodesac isini Temur lengis jarebma
ankarasTan daamarcxes. mcire drois
ganmavlobaSi isini monRolebis vasalebi
gaxdnen.
sulTan mehmed I-is, murad II-isa da mehmed II
dampyrobels zeobisas otomanTa eqspansia
isev ganaxlda. 1453 wels konstantinopoli
daeca da bizantia ganadgurda. mehmed
II-m eqspansia balkaneTisaken gaagrZela.
1481 wels mehmeT II-is gargacvalebisas,
otomanTa armia italiaSi iyo da
romisaken miiwevda. selim I-sa da suleiman
II-is mmarTvelobis dros imperiis
SemadgenlobaSi axlo aRmosavleTis
didi nawili, levanti, egvipte da Crdilo
afrika Sedioda. 1529 wels suleimanma
venas Semoartya alya. marTalia, venis
damcvelebma Setevis mogerieba SeZles,
magram evropisaTvis naTeli gaxda,
rom isini mzardsa da agresiul Zalas
daupirispirdnen. es dapirispireba sami
saukunis ganmavlobaSi grZeldeboda.
am drois ganmavlobaSi Savi zRvidan
gibraltaramde araerTi brZola gaimarTa.
Sedegad ki miviReT is religiurad da
eTnikurad Wreli sazogadoeba, romelic
dRes am regionSi cxovrobs. pirvel
msoflio omamde otomanebi xmelTaSua
zRvis sanapiros TiTqmis mTlianad
flobdnen. Turanuli modgmis xalxebs
dRes anatoliidan Sua aziasa da dasavleT
CineTamde SexvdebiT. Tanamedrove Turquli
sazogadoeba anatoliaSi antikuri,
bizantiuri da aRmosavluri gavlenebis
kvals atarebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor126
The fertile lands of the Erzincan-Çayırlı region, where the akmezar settlement was located, were well suited for irrigation and also on transportation routes. Ceramics dating from the 11th to the 14th centuries aD, found at akmezar, displayed a limited number of sgraffito glazed and other decoration techniques. a large number of practical containers typically used for storage and transportation were present, indicating a settlement of modest size and regional influence. Both the Erzincan and Çayırlı regions during the 11th though 14th centuries were densely populated, yet seem to have had a highly mobile population. Many of the structures uncovered in this area were crudely built and could be abandoned easily. ram sculptures were also found at Akmezar, Başköy and other villages.
milsadenebis mSeneblobisas
mimdinareOarqeologiurma samuSaoebma
otomanuri periodis ori Zegli
gamoavlina. Cilhorozi da aqmezari
erzinkanis maxloblad, Crdilo-
aRmosavleT anatoliaSi, erzrumze
gamavali savaWro gzis maxloblad
mdebareobs. orive bizantiuri
mflobelobis bolo periodiT TariRdeba
da Sua saukuneebis sasoflo dasaxlebaa.
erzinkan-Cairlis mxareebis nayofieri
miwebi, sadac akmezaris nasoflari
mdebareobda, kargad irwyveboda da savaWro
gzebTanac axlos iyo. aq mopovebuli XI–
XIV saukuneebis keramika moWiqulia an
sxvadasxva ornamentiTaa Semkuli. didi
zomis WurWeli, romelic transportirebisa
da sxvadasxva produqtis Sesanaxavad
iyo damzadebuli, vaWrobis ganviTarebaze
migvaniSnebs. XI–XIV saukuneebis erzinkan-
Cairlis mxareebi mWidrod ar iyo
dasaxlebuli. mosaxleoba erT adgilze
ar Cerdeboda. aq aRmoCenil nasoflarebze
Cans, rom Senobebi naCqarevad Sendeboda da
maT maleve tovebdnen. akmezarze, baSqoisa
da sxva soflebSi xSirad gvxvdeba verZis
qandakebebi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 127
1 It should be noted that the dates assigned here to archaeological periods vary for each country, reflecting each country’s historical context. In light of national historiographic traditions, and out of respect for the works of the many historians from whom this volume drew, the authors of the present work decided to cite and retain some alternative or divergent perspectives on the past, as applied to specific regions. Further, given some of the methodological challenges of archaeology, this diversity of views can contribute to understanding of events and places about which active research on archeological finds, documents, inscriptions, and literary records continues.
2 This section on “Azerbaijan” is authored solely by Dr. Najaf Museyibli of the Institute of archaeology and Ethnography, Baku, Azerbaijan.
3 М.М.Гусейнов. Ранние стадии заселения человека в пещере Азых. Ученые записки Аз.Гос.Универ., сер. истории и философии, № 4. Баку,1979; М.М.Гусейнов. Древний палеолит Азербайджана. Баку, 1985; Mənsur Mənsurоv. Qafqazda ilk paleоlit abidələri. Azərbaycan arхeоlоgiyası və etnоqrafiyası jurnalı. № 2, 2003; Мансуров М. Палеолит Азербайджана. Международная научная конференция «Археология и этнология Кавказа», Тбилиси, 2002; С.С.Велиев, М.М.Мансуров. К вопросу о возрасте древнейших слоев Азыхской пещерной стоянки. Доклады Академии Наук Азербайджана, 1999, № 3-4).
4 P.M. Касимова. Первые палеоаптропологические находки в Кобыстане Журн. «Вопросы антропологии» вып 46. Москва – 1974).
5 O.Эфендиев. Азербайджанское государство Сефевидов в начале XVI века, Баку, 1981.
6 the writing of the Georgian language has progressed through three distinct forms; asomtavruli, Nuskhuri, and Mkhedruli. at times these graphic forms were used together and shared some of the same letters. the most recent alphabet, Mkhedruli, contains more letters than the two earlier versions, although those extra letters are no longer needed for writing modern Georgian.
7 The Bagrationi Dynasty ruled Georgia until the 19th century aD, when the russian empire annexed Georgia
1 unda aRiniSnos, rom zemoT aRniSnuli
arqeologiuri periodizacia sxvadasxva
qveynisaTvis gansxvavebulia da maT
istoriul ganviTarebas asaxavs. es
wigni istorikosebis naSromebisa da
erovnuli istoriografiebis tradiciebis
pativiscemiT daiwera.Aamitom, naSromis
avtorebma gadawyvites daecvaT regionebis
warmomadgenelebis Sexedulebebi.
viTvaliwinebT ra arqeologiuri
meTodologiis problemebs, azrTa
es sxvadasxvaoba, SesaZloa Zeglebis
SeswavlisaTvis xelSemwyobi faqtori
gaxdes.
2 es Tavi _ “azerbaijani”, baqos arqeologiisa
da eTnografiis institutis TanamSromlis,
najaf museiblis mieraa dawerili.
3 М.М.Гусейнов. Ранние стадии заселения человека в пещере Азых. Ученые записки Аз.Гос.Универ., сер. истории и философии, № 4. Баку,1979; М.М.Гусейнов. Древний палеолит Азербайджана. Баку, 1985; Mənsur Mənsurоv. Qafqazda ilk paleоlit abidələri. Azərbaycan arхeоlоgiyası və etnоqrafiyası jurnalı. № 2, 2003; Мансуров М. Палеолит Азербайджана. Международная научная конференция «Археология и этнология Кавказа», Тбилиси, 2002; С.С.Велиев, М.М.Мансуров. К вопросу о возрасте древнейших слоев Азыхской пещерной стоянки. Доклады Академии Наук Азербайджана, 1999, № 3-4).
4 P.M. Касимова. Первые палеоантропологические находки в Кобыстане Журн. «Вопросы антропологии» вып 46. Москва – 1974).
5 O.Эфендиев. Азербайджанское государство Сефевидов в начале XVI века, Баку, 1981.
6 qarTuli damwerloba sam etaps moicavs,
romelTaTvisac damaxasiaTebelia
gansxvavebul grafikuli forma. esaa:
asomTavruli, nusxuri da mxedruli.
Tanamedrove qarTul damwerlobas mxedruli
ewodeba. am anbanSi SemorCenilia Zveli
qarTulisaTvis damaxasiaTebeli zogierTi
aso-niSani, Tumca igi dRes aRar ixmareba.
7 bagrationTa dinastia saqarTvelos XIX
saukunemde, ruseTis mier mis aneqsiamde
ganagebda.
This small pot with lid from Yevlakh, located incentral Azerbaijan, may have held a grave offering.A cord passed through a hole at the top may havesecured the lid.
azerbaijanSi, evlaxSi, mopovebuli WurWeli samarxSia aRmoCenili. WurWlis zeda nawilze datovebul xvrelSi Toki iyo gatarebuli, riTac xufi magrdeboda.
The friezes on this terracotta plaque from theGeorgian site of Klde were carved rather thanpressed. The style of the animals on both the upperand lower levels is characteristic of Persian reliefs. saqarTveloSi, kldis nasaxlarze, napovn Tixis filaze datanili cxovelebis gamosaxuleba sparsul reliefebTan poulobs paralelebs.
This iron ring with a carnelian stone was found atYuceoren in a double-chambered tomb that yieldednumerous other finds, including the remains of22 individuals, of whom 14 were adults and 8were children.
sardionis Tvliani rkinis beWedi ieqeronis organyofilebian akldamaSia aRmoCenili. aq dakrZaluli iyo 22 adamiani, romelTa Soris 14 zrdasruli, 8 ki bavSvi iyo.
0 0.5 1cm
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor134
Chapter 3
archaeological Sites along the pipeline
people and societies throughout history have used material culture to portray what they considered their distinctive characteristics
that set them apart from others. Clothing, jewelry, weaponry, coins, and the form and decorative elements of utilitarian objects such as tools and vessels all bespoke something about their owners’ cultural heritage, family or personal status, religious beliefs, and group memberships. the use of material culture to proclaim something distinctive about their creation or use is also found in architecture, monuments, burial sites and practices, religious symbols, and other forms of material culture.
materialuri kultura
TiToeuli adamianisa
da sazogadoebis
gansxvavebulobasa da
gansakuTrebul xasiaTze metyvelebs.
tansacmeli, samkauli, iaraRi, monetebi,
Sromis iaraRisa da WurWlis
dekoratiuli elementebi da sxva
nivTiebi misi mesakuTris religiur
rwmena-warmodgenebze, kulturul
tradiciebsa da socialur statusze
gviambobs. igive informacias atarebs
arqiteqturuli nagebobebi, samarxebi
da dakrZalvis wesebi, religiuri
simboloebi, agreTve materialuri
kulturis sxva formebi.
Tavi 3
arqeologiuri Zeglebi milsadenis derefanSi
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 135
the South Caucasus and eastern anatolian regions have seen much influence from external cultures, often because of trade connections and invasions. Material evidence of diverse cultures lies hidden under the soil until disturbed by later generations. Such was the case with the pipelines project. Excavations of sites discovered during the pipelines construction unearthed many exciting finds that have deepened and enriched understanding of the peoples and societies that created them, as well as raising intriguing questions that only further excavations and research will resolve.
the archaeological sites described in this chapter, each unique in terms of age, function, and finds, are only a small fraction of the hundreds found during the course of the pipeline project. the primary aim in this chapter is to give an account of the material evidence uncovered from them, encourage further study, and foster appreciation of the regional peoples and their environments. The first three sites are located in Azerbaijan, the second three in Georgia, and the final three in turkey.
saukuneebis ganmavlobaSi samxreT kavkasiam
da anatoliam garesamyaros kulturebis
didi gavlena ganicada, rac vaWrobas an
Semosevebs ukavSirdeboda. sxvadasxva
kulturebis warsuli xSirad miwiT
ifareba da xeluxlebeli rCeba iqamde,
sanam mas Semdgomi Taobebi ar pouloben.
ase iyo milsadenebis mSeneblobis
drosac, rodesac arqeologebma am
proeqtis mimdinareobisas gamovlenili
araerTi mniSvnelovani Zegli Seiswavles.
Aaxalma aRmoCenebma gaaRrmava da
gaafarTova codna Zveli adamianebisa
da sazogadoebebis Sesaxeb, gamoiwvia
didi interesi da axali kiTxvebi
dabada, romlebzedac mxolod momavalma
gaTxrebma SeiZleba gasces pasuxi.
am TavSi ganxiluli arqeologiuri
Zeglebi erTmaneTisagan Tavisi asakiT,
daniSnulebiTa da mopovebuli masaliT
gansxvavdeba. milsadenebis mSeneblobisas
samive qveyanaSi aseulobiT Zegli
gaiTxara. qvemoT aRwerili aRmoCenebi
maTi mcire nawilia. Aam Tavis mizania
gavecnoT am Zeglebs, xeli SevuwyoT
maTs Semdgom kvlevas da regionis
mosaxleobas gavacnoT isini. pirveli
sami Zegli azerbaijanidanaa, momdevno
sami saqarTvelodan, bolo sami ki -
TurqeTidan.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor136
Azerbaijan
Dashbulaq
Dashbulaq is one of a series of Medieval sites found in the Shamkir region in northwest Azerbaijan. Additional sites from the same period are located at the Faxrali village in the Goranboy region and at the Lak and hajiali villages in the Samukh region, also in the northwest. Ganja was one of the largest cities in the Caucasus during the late Middle ages, before an earthquake in 1139 killed thousands of people. Shamkir was an important fortress on the Shamkir river and the scene of several battles during the early Middle Ages. These various sites provide examples of distinctive, localized examples of medieval society in the area. the remains of historic bridges on the Zayamchai and Shamkirchai Rivers reflect the engineering of the time. Caravans following the greater Silk road would likely have crossed these bridges as they passed through this portion of Azerbaijan.
the Dashbulaq site is notable for the number of its archaeological layers, which speak of sequential periods of occupation, destruction, and rebuilding. the village at Dashbulaq was most active between the 9th and 11th centuries aD. Because only a small part of the village site was uncovered excavations took place only where the pipeline route passed directly through the village—it is only possible to speculate about what else might be there. A permanent settlement or town from the period might have contained a bazaar, caravanserai (inn), mosque, and madrasah (school). The excavations at Dashbulaq did, however, reveal numerous features that archaeologists would expect to see in permanent villages and settlements. These features, which also have ethnographic parallels today, include
azerbaijani
daSbulaqi
daSbulaqi AazerbaijanSi, Samqoris
raionSi, aRmoCenili Sua saukuneebis erT-
erTi Zeglia. amave droisaa faqsarlis
(goranbois raionSi), lakisa da hajialis
(orive samuxis raionSi) nasoflarebi.
1139 wlamde, rodesac miwisZvram aTasobiT
adamiani imsxverpla, ganja kavkasiaSi
erT-erTi didi qalaqi iyo. Samqoris
cixesimagre mniSvnelovani punqti iyo,
romlis maxloblad araerTi brZola
momxdara. md. zaiamCaisa da Samqorze
arsebuli istoriuli xidebi sainJinro
xelovnebis nimuSebia. abreSumis gzaze
mimaval qaravnebs maTze unda gadaevloT,
rodesac azerbaijanis am monakveTs
gadiodnen. erTmaneTisagan gansxvavebuli
Zeglebi Sua saukuneebis sazogadoebis
ganviTarebas asaxavs.
daSbulaqi mravalfeniani arqeologiuri
Zeglia da am dasaxlebis sxvadasxva
periodis, ngrevisa da aRmSeneblobis
Sesaxeb mogviTxrobs. arqeologiuri
gaTxrebi mis mxolod mcire nawilze,
milsadenis viwro arealze Catarda.
amitom SeiZleba gamovTqvaT mxolod
varaudi, Tu ra nagebobebi SeiZleba
arsebuliyo mis gareT. dasaxlebul
punqtSi, rogorc wesi, unda yofiliyo
qarvasla, sastumro, meCeTi da medrese.
daSbulaqis gaTxrebisas gamovlenilma
mravalma nagebobam aq namosaxlaris
arseboba daadastura. mopovebul masalas
dRevandelobasTanac aqvs eTnografiuli
paralelebi, magaliTisaTvis gamodgeba
Zeglze mopovebuli Toneebi, didi
qvevrebi, sameurneo ormoebi, WurWeli (maT
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 137
Tandirs (ovens) such as the two above are a common feature at sites from the Medieval Period. They were constructed from coiled clay and fired in place.
Tandirebi (Toneebi) Sua saukuneebis ZeglebisaTvis damaxasiaTebelia. isini Tixisagan mzaddeboda da adgilze gamoiwveboda.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor138
Zoomorphic images of birds, goats, dogs, and wildanimals were stamped into the shoulders of severalpots from Dashbulaq.
Citebis, Txebis, ZaRlebisa da gareuli cxovelebis gamosaxulebebi daSbulaqSi aRmoCenili WurWlis mxrebzea datanili.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 139
tandirs (clay-formed ovens), massive storage pits, and burial sites. among the recovered artifacts are typical domestic items such as utilitarian ceramic cooking vessels and finer serving vessels (including a well-preserved stamped pot with an animal motif and glazed pottery in a typical Islamic style). Personal items included fragments of several glass bracelets. the stratigraphy of the material evidence also seems to indicate an initial Christian community followed by a later Islamic one. this transition seems to have occurred at some time in the middle of the 9th century. The pipeline-related excavations found six Christian graves- a relatively small amount of material reflecting this seemingly earlier Christian community at Dashbulaq. however, it is not entirely clear whether these graves belong to the same period.
Soris, kargad daculi moWiquli qoTani,
romelzedac islamuri samyarosaTvis
damaxasiaTebeli ornamentia datanili),
piradi moxmarebis nivTTagan sayuradReboa
minis samajurebi. Zeglis stratigrafia
IX saukuneSi qristianuli sazogadoebis
islamuriT Canacvlebas gviCvenebs.
milsadenis teritoriaze mikvleul
Zeglebze qristianuli periodis Zeglebis
arqeologiuri masala bevrad naklebi
raodenobiTaa aRmoCenili, vidre islamuri
kulturis materialuri naSTebi.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor140
Zayamchai and Tovuzchai
Multiple graves at Zayamchai and Tovuzchai, two closely related necropoli excavated along the pipeline corridor in Azerbaijan, yielded extensive insights into the burial practices in the Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age (approximately 1,400-700 BC).
In 2002, archaeologists of the Institute of archaeology and ethnography first recorded the Zayamchai necropolis (or “city of the dead”), located on the east banks of the river of the same name, during baseline surveys carried out during Stage 1 of the project. Subsequent excavations conducted in 2003 uncovered over 130 graves that yielded hundreds of intact pottery vessels, many unique bronze artifacts (including daggers, javelin points, and various decorative pieces), and other ritual objects. the findings indicate that advanced Late Bronze Age (Xojali-Gedabey) cultures were present in the Kura Valley at the end of the second millennium BC. the variety and skilled workmanship reflect a highly coherent, structured local society.
zaiamCai da TovuzCai
zaiamCaisa da TovuzCais erTmaneTTan
axlomdebare gvianbrinjao-adrerkinis
xanis (Zv.w. 1,400-700) samarovnebze
gamovlenda araerTi samarxi, ramac am
periodis dakrZalvis wesebis Sesaxeb
saintereso masala mogvca.
baqos arqeologiisa da eTnografiis
institutis arqeologebma jer zaiamCais
samarovani (“micvalebulTa qalaqi”)
Seiswavles. igi amave dasaxelebis mdinaris
napirze mdebareobs da arqeologiuri
programis I, sabazo kvlevebis
etapze gaiTxara. gaTxrebi 2002 wels
mimdinareobda. 130 samarxSi aseulobiT
dauzianebeli Tixis WurWeli, brinjaos
satevrebi, Subispirebi, samkauli da sxva
saritualo nivTi aRmoCnda. samarovnis
gaTxrebisas mopovebuli masala gviCvenebs,
rom ganviTarebuli gvianbrinjaos
xanis xojali-gedabeis kultura Zv.w.
meore aTaswleulis dasasruls mtkvris
xeobaSic vrceldeboda. masalis
mravalferovneba da daxvewiloba kargad
ganviTarebul sazogadoebaze migvaniSnebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 141
Archaeologists will be working for years to come tointerpret the markings scratched on the bottom ofthis pot before it was fired.
am WurWlis Zirze gamosaxuli niSnebis gasaSifrad arqeologebs albaT wlebi dasWirdebaT.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor142
This distinctive three-legged shallow footed vesselis decorated across its top and bottom.
es gansakuTrebuli samfexa WurWeli
mTlianadaa ornamentirebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 143
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor144
the project’s planning team rerouted the pipelines in this area to avoid impacting two other significant cultural heritage sites located nearby. One was a large and complex settlement that seems to date from the Late Bronze Age, and the second was a historic bridge crossing the Zayamchai that likely dates from the Middle ages.
The Tovuzchai necropolis, uncovered on the west bank of the river of the same name, was similar to the necropolis at Zayamchai. The 80-plus graves excavated at this site during 2004 and 2005 similarly revealed a rich burial culture. particularly noteworthy were the complete pots with the remains of the deceased; in some cases over 20 complete pots had been buried at the same time. Other items from the graves included bronze daggers and arrowheads, bronze bosses (a circular bulge or knoblike form protruding from a surrounding flatter area), and hundreds of beads made from carnelian, agate, and glass paste. the internments at the sites seem to have taken place over several hundred years without notable interruption.
milsadenis daproeqtebisas dacvis mizniT
or Zegls auares gverdi. erTi unda iyos
gvianbrinjaos xanis didi nasaxlari, meore
ki Sua saukuneebis xidia, romelic md.
zaiamCaizea gadebuli.
TovuzCais samarovani, romelic amave
dasaxelebis mdinaris napirasaa, zaiamCais
samarovnis msgavsia. 2004-2005 wlebSi
gaTxrilma 80-ze metma samarxma mdidari
masala mogvca. aRsaniSnavia, kargad
Senaxuli, micvalebulebis naSTebis
Semcveli, Tixis WurWeli. zogan TiTo
samarxSi 20 aseTi WurWelia daculi.
samarxeuli masala warmodgenilia
satevrebiTa da isris pirebiT, sardionis
aqatisa da miniseburi pastis aseulobiT
mZiviT. samarovans, rogorc Cans, ramdenime
aseuli wlis ganmavlobaSi uwyvetad
iyenebdnen.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 145
These bronze decorations likely were worn onthe chest and may have been designed torepresent snakes.
brinjaos am samkauls, romelzedac, savaraudod, gvelebia gamosaxuli, albaT mkerdze atarebdnen
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor146
The Tovuzchai graves were of two general types: shallow ones covered by rounded river stones, and deeper earthen ones. There is no clear pattern with respect to grave depth and composition of the items placed in them; some burial chambers were large but modestly furnished, while others were small but filled with rich arrays of burial items. In some, the skeletal remains were disarticulated; in others, the individuals were buried with animals. the head of the skeleton in one grave rested on a number of polished and painted ceramic plates and pots. This arrangement may reflect specific spiritual or religious beliefs. A bronze bracelet, bronze earring, and seashell and agate beads were found on or near the skeleton.
Several large storage vessels found in the nearby village may have been part of the same complex as Tovuzchai necropolis. Archaeological material recovered from the Tovuzchai necropolis indicates that a settlement had existed near this site for six or seven centuries.
TovuzCais samarovanze samarxebis ori
tipi gamoiyofa. pirveli Rrma ar aris da
riyis qviTaa SemosazRvruli, meore ki Rrma
ormosamarxebia. maT Soris socialuri
gansxvaveba ar Cans, radgan zogierT
did samarxSi ar iyo bevri masala,
xolo ramdenime momcro zomis samarxSi
mdidruli inventaria. zogierT samarxSi
ConCxebi danawevrebulia, sxvagan ki
cxovelebi adamianebTan erTad daumarxavT.
erT samarxSi micvalebuls Tavi ramdenime
moxatulsa da naprialeb WurWelze edo. es
wesi, rogorc Cans, religiur warmodgenebs
asaxavs. aq aRmoCnda brinjaos samajuri,
zRvis niJara da aqatis mZivebi.
miuxedavad imisa, rom gaTxrebisas
namosaxlari ar aRmoCenila, unda
vivaraudoT, rom igi axlos mdebareobda.
am namosaxlaris nawili unda iyos
Zeglis maxloblad, erTi kilometris
manZilze aRmoCenili didi qvevrebi.
TovuzCais samarovnis masala gviCvenebs,
rom dasaxlebas 6-7 saukunis ganmavlobaSi
unda earseba.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 147
Bronze adornment, found at Zayamchai that datesto the Bronze age. 5cm x 5.5cm.
zaiamCais samarovanze aRmoCenili es brinjaos samkauli brinjaos xaniT TariRdeba (zomebi 5X5,5sm).
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor148
The head of the deceased in this grave waspositioned on top of several ceramic serving andstorage vessels, in the Tovuzchai necropolis.Carnelian beads were found below the jaw.
TovuzCais samarovnis am samarxSi micvalebuls Tavi ramdenime WurWelze edo. ybisAqveS aRmoCnda sardionis mZivebi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 149
This highly decorated vessel found from theZayamchai necropolis was a churn and usedto produce butter from milk. Similar vessels arestill used in parts of Azerbaijan today to producehomemade butter.
es ornamentirebili WurWeli zaiamCais samarovnidan sadRvebeli iyo da mas karaqis misaRebad xmarobdnen. aseTive WurWels iyeneben Tamnamedrove azerbaijanSi Sinauri karaqis asadRvebad.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor150
The Hasansu Kurgan
the remains of a kurgan found near hasansu in western Azerbaijan reflect Middle Bronze Age cultures in the region. the kurgan is similar to those of the Tazakand and Trialeti cultures that spanned Azerbaijan and Georgia from approximately 2,200 to 1,700 BC. It is notable for the fascinating orientation of 71 pottery vessels, adjacent to a deceased juvenile, arranged in distinct parallel lines along two walls inside an excavated kurgan. The shoulders of many of the pots were decorated with etched bands of chevrons and other formal designs. A scattering of domestic animal bones may be from food provided for the deceased in the afterlife. Skulls and leg bones of bulls had been placed in two corners of the burial chamber, a deliberate arrangement
This photograph demonstrates the upright positioning and semi-symmetrical arrangement of the pottery vessels uncovered.
es foto gviCvenebs, Tu rogor iyo gamwkrivebuli Tixis WurWeli hasansus yorRanis dasakrZalavi kameris kedlebTan.
hasansus KyorRani
dasavleT azerbaijanSi, hasansus
maxloblad, aRmoCenili yorRani
Suabrinjaos xaniT TariRdeba. igi
tazakendisa da TrialeTis kulturebis
(azerbaijanisa da saqarTvelos
Suabrinjaos xanis kulturebi, 2700-1700 Zv.
ww.) nimuSia. sayuradReboa aq mopovebuli
Tixis 71 WurWeli, romlebic yorRanis
kedlebis paraleluradaa Camwkrivebuli.
maTi nawili SevronebiTa da sxva
ornamentiTaa Semkuli. aq aRmoCenili
Sinauri cxovelebis Zvlebi micvalebuls
im qveyanaSi unda gamodgomoda. xaris Tav-
fexi dasakrZalavi kameris oTxive kuTxeSi
ido, rasac, savaraudod, xarebSebmuli
urmis STabeWdileba unda Seeqmna. aqvea
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 151
perhaps intended to represent a bull-drawn chariot or cart. Other finds included bronze pins, baskets, and perforated beads. Several kurgans excavated at hasansu are similar to others discovered in the 1980s in the Shamkir region of western Azerbaijan.
the discovery of this kurgan in the aGt pipelines corridor illustrates the burial practices of the Middle Bronze Age, which had previously been poorly documented in this area. Some archaeologists view the introduction of burials in the style of hansansu to this region as evidence of foreign populations moving into the region, or of an internal evolution in burial practices.
Seventy-one ceramic vessels from the Hansansukurgan highlight the technical skill of potters duringthe Middle Bronze Age in the South Caucasus. Some of the vessels may have been manufactured specifically for use in this burial.
hasansus yorRanSi mopovebuli Tixis 71 WurWeli Suabrinjaos xanis kavkasieli meTuneebis maRal ostatobaze migviTiTebs. zogierTi WurWeli am samarxisaTvis unda damzadebuliyo.
Rows of pottery vessels lined both sides of theburial chamber in the Hasansu kurgan. Theexcavators speculate that the pattern seen in thecenter of the chamber might have been a symbolicrepresentation of a cart pulled by oxen or bulls.
es foto gviCvenebs, Tu rogor iyo gamwkrivebuli Tixis WurWeli hasansus yorRanis dasakrZalavi kameris kedlebTan. Zeglis gamTxrelebi varaudoben, rom aq aRmoCenili xaris Tavi xarebSebmuli urmis simbolo iyo.
mopovebuli brinjaos sakinZebi da mZivebi.
hasansuSi gaTxrili ramdenime yorRani
dasavleT azerbaijanSi, Samqoris raionSi
1980 wels aRmoCenili yorRanebis msgavsia
mkvlevarTa erTi nawilis azriT, aseTi
yorRanebi regionSi ucxotomelTa
Semosvlaze, an dakrZalvis wesis
adgilobriv ganviTarebaze migviTiTebs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor152
Georgia
Saphar-Kharaba archaeologists found more than 100 burial chambers encircled by basalt at the Saphar-Kharaba necropolis in the historic region of trialeti (Tsalka District) of southern Georgia. Analysis suggests that the site was used in the 15th-mid-14th centuries BC. With only a few exceptions, the rectangular graves were uniform. each contained skeletons in crouched positions oriented north to south, a pattern that indicates well-established funerary practices. the graves also contained several distinctive artifacts. For example, a cylindrical seal depicting a figure kneeling at an altar with a rod in its hand is a common motif of the Mittani or hurrian art that was widespread in the Levant and Mesopotamia. Other objects include bronze daggers and surgical scalpels of a type not common elsewhere in the Caucasus.
One of the graves contained a poorly preserved wooden cart with the remains of an axle, wheel, and yoke. two clay vessels were positioned on what remained of the cart’s bed. Under these vessels, human remains were found.
The triangular bronze blade of this Near Easterntype of dagger, found at the Saphar-Kharaba site,has low ridges along both sides and is set withfluted frame lines. Both sides of the shaft hadresidue from wood plates. This type of dagger wascommon in the Transcaucasus in the 15th-14thcenturies BC.
safar-xarabaSi aRmoCeniliEes samkuTxapiriani satevari axloaRmosavluri tipisaa. taris orive mxareze xis kvalia SemorCenili. aseTi satevrebi kavkasiaSi Zv.w. XV-XVII saukuneebSi gvxvdeba.
saqarTvelo
safar-xaraba
TrialeTSi, safar-xarabas samarovanze,
arqeologebma 100-ze meti samarxi
Seiswavles. Zegli Zv.w. XV saukuniTa
da XVI saukunis SuaxanebiT TariRdeba.
samarxebi, mcire gamonaklisis garda,
oTxkuTxa formisa iyo. adamianebi
imdroindeli dakrZalvis wesis mixedviT
iwvnen gverdze, xelfexmokecilad,
CrdiloeT–samxreTis RerZze. samarxebSi
mniSvnelovani artefaqtebi aRmoCnda.
aRsaniSnavia cilindruli sabeWdavi,
romelzedac sakurTxevlis win
daCoqili adamiania gamosaxuli. es nivTi
axlo paralelebs poulobs miTanur,
agreTve levantursa da mesopotamiur
xelovnebasTan. samarovanze gvxvdeba
rogorc adgilobrivi warmoSobis, ise
Semotanili nivTebic.
erT samarxSi aRmoCenilia cudad
SemorCenili urmis uRlisa da RerZ-
borblis nawilebi. masze Tixis ori
WurWeli ido. WurWlis qveS adamianis
Zvlebi aRmoCnda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 153
Unfortunately, archaeologists did not discover this grave until after the pipeline construction had disturbed much of the contents, making it difficult to reconstruct this particular burial.
a skeleton of a man believed to have been 40-50-years-old has particular significance because samples of fabric were attached to it that provided clues to the type of fabrics produced in Georgia during this period. the samples were linen, cotton, and wool dyed with pigments that at the time could only have been extracted from mollusks along the Mediterranean coast. Because the raw dye was highly perishable, these textiles must have been produced and dyed near the Mediterranean before they were imported into the Caucasus. this suggests connections between the South Caucasus and surrounding regions, and perhaps the presence of early trade networks.
samwuxarod, samarxi mxolod samSeneblo
samuSaoebisas, misi dazianebis Semdeg
gamovlinda, ramac misi mTliani
rekonstruqcia gaaZnela.
samarxSi dakrZaluliMmamakaci 40-50
wlisa unda yofiliyo. samarovnis masala
mniSvnelovania imiTac, rom aq aRmoCenili
selis, bambisa da Salis qsovilebis
SesaRebavad unda gamoeyenebinaT pigmentebi,
romlebic xmelTaSua zRvis moluskebisagan
mzaddeboda. saRebavi advilad fuWdeboda
da misi transportireba gaZnelebuli
iqneboda, amitom, savaraudoa, rom qsovilebi
xmelTaSua zRvispireTidanaa Semotanili,
rac samxreT kavkasiasa da gare samyaros
Soris arsebul savaWro urTierTobebze
metyvelebs.
am grafikul tabulaze samarxSi aRmoCenili 2,1 metris sigrZisa da 1,1 metris siganis etlis naxatia. aseTi etlebi gvianbrinjaos xanisaTvisaa damaxasiaTebeli. etlze, savaraudod, ori WurWeli ido.
This sketch illustrates the remains of an ox-drawn cart, measuring 2.1 meters long and 1.1 meters at the widest point, found in one grave. The cart’s triangular shape was common during the later Bronze Age. At least two ceramic vessels were placed on or with the cart.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor154
This sketch shows the configuration of a typical burial, which generally contained several clay vessels placed behind the head of the deceased and weapons placed in front. Bronze pins were frequently found near the neck, beads and pendants in the chest area, and cornelian beads on the wrists and feet.
am grafikul tabulaze tipuri samarxia gamosaxuli. igi Seicavs micvalebulis TavTan dawyobil Tixis ramdenime WurWelsa da brinjaos iaraRs. sakinZebi, mZivebi da sakidebi micvalebulis gul-mkerdisa da xelebis areSia aRmoCenili.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 155
This cylindrical seal, believed to have originated in the Hurrian Kingdom of Mittani in northern Mesopotamia, depicts a man kneeling and possibly holding a staff and a goat. Seals such as this were common in Mesopotamia and were sometimes used to officially mark clay records.
es cilindruli sabeWdavi miTanuri (Crdilo mesopotamia) warmoSobisa unda iyos. masze gamosaxulia sakurTxevlis win muxlmodrekili adamiani, romelsac kverTxi uWiravs. aseTi sabeWdavebi mesopotamiaSiac gvxvdeba.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor156
Klde
The Klde settlement is situated on a terraced slope at the confluence of the Mtkvari and Potskhovai rivers near the turkish border in southwestern Georgia, along a major trade route that once linked the South Caucasus and eastern anatolia. the site, encompassing a large multi-layer settlement and a cemetery, extends over 3,486 square meters and includes structures, graves, and storage pits. The excavations yielded excellent and extensive cultural material from the first millennium AD. The settlement appears to have been destroyed by fire and rebuilt several times. The last fire in the 7th century AD, possibly during the campaign of Byzantine Emperor Flavius Heraclius or during an arab invasion, led to the abandonment of the site. The structures excavated during the pipeline project appear to have been domestic and were constructed from stone with tile roofs. all the dwellings possessed hearths for cooking, generally located either in the center or corner of the structure. The settlement’s layout leads archaeologists to believe that the structures also had a defensive purpose. Several stone sling bullets of different shapes and sizes may have been a means of defense against attackers.
klde
arqeologiuri Zegli, romelic kldis
namosaxlaris saxeliTaa cnobili,
mdebareobs samxreT-dasavleT
saqarTveloSi, istoriul provincia
samcxeSi, TurqeTis sazRvris maxloblad,
mdinareebis - mtkvrisa da focxovis
SesarTavTan, samxreT kavkasiisa da
anatoliis damakavSirebeli gzis piras.
arqeologiuri Zegli, romelic moicavs
mravalfenian samarovansa da namosaxlars,
3486 m2-is farTobzea gavrcelebuli. aq
warmodgenilia nagebobebi, samarxebi da
sameurneo ormoebi. gaTxrebma ax.w. I
aTaswleulis saintereso da mniSvnelovani
masala mogvca. dasaxleba, rogorc
Cans, ramdenjerme gaanadgura xanZarma.
ukanaskneli xanZari VII saukuneSi
momxdara, savaraudod, bizantiis imperator
herakles an arabTa Semosevisas, ris
Semdegac dasaxleba gaukacrielda. aq
aRmoCenili nagebobebi saxlebia. isini
qviTaa aSenebuli, zogierTi maTgani
ki kramitiT iyo gadaxuruli. yvela
saxlSi, oTaxis centrSi an kedelTan
gamarTuli iyo kera. arqeologTa azriT,
zogierT nagebobas TavdacviTi funqcia
hqonda. Zeglze aRmoCenili, sxvadasxva
zomis qvis Wurvebi, SesaZloa, TavdacviTi
funqciisaTvisac gamoiyeneboda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 157
The clothing worn by the figure on this small altarfound at the Klde site exhibits Parthian influences,including long sleeves and a wide knee-length skirt.The raised right hand suggests a gesture ofadoration to gods and kings commonly found onParthian rock reliefs.
kldeSi aRmoCenil Tixis patara sakurTxevelze gamosaxul figuras grZelsaxeloebiani, muxlebamde daSvebuli parTuli samosi mosavs. misi zeapyrobili xeli ki RmerTebisa da mefeebis gandidebis parTul scenebs waagavs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor158
Interment at some of the burial sites at Klde, which were concentrated in three separate areas, occurred in stone-lined pit graves, some of them edged with stone, while others were in wine jars. Many of the skeletons were lying on their backs, but others were on their sides in crouched positions. These differences mean the burials took place in at least three cultural periods and may reflect broad religious and other cultural changes over time. Indeed, in the region under the Kartli (Iberia) Kingdom, differences between pre-Christian and Christian funerary cultures shed light on the shift to Christianity, with some graves manifesting both Christian and pre-Christian funerary traditions.
A particularly interesting find at the Klde site, dating to the 3rd-4th centuries AD, is a platform that contained 15 ritual vessels along with human bones. however, a clay altar in a corner suggests that the site was a place of cult worship rather than a burial site. the altar bears both roman and Persian reliefs. The right hand of one figure is raised in a way similar to a gesture of adoration of kings and gods found in the parthian artistic tradition. Burned areas on the altar, along with the decorative motifs, suggest traditions associated with Zoroastrian altars.
kldeSi aRmoCenili samarxebi sam ubanzea
gadanawilebuli. gvxvdeba qvasamarxebi,
ormosamarxebi da qvevrsamarxebi. zogierTi
micvalebuli zurgze iyo dakrZaluli,
sxvebi _ gverdze, xelfexmokecilad.
dakrZalvis ritualSi arsebuli
gansxvavebebi, SesaZloa, am drois
ganmavlobaSi mimdinare did cvlilebebs
davukavSiroT. samcxe qarTlis samefos
nawili iyo da aqac kargadaa asaxuli
qristianobamdeli da qristianuli xanis
dakrZalvis ritualis Taviseburebebi.
sainteresoa is samarxebi, sadac
dakrZalvis orive wesia dadasturebuli.
Zalze sayuradReboa arqeologiur Zeglze
aRmoCenili III-IV saukuneebis moedani,
romelzec 15 ritualuri WurWelia
dafiqsirebuli. aq mikvleuli mcire zomis
Tixis sakurTxeveli romaulsa da parTul
gavlenas atarebs. masze gamosaxul
erT figuras parTuli xelovnebisaTvis
damaxasiaTebeli niSnebi aqvs. misi dekori
zoroastrul sakurTxevlebze gamosaxuli
Semkulobis msgavsia.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 159
This bronze deer amulet reflects the relationship ofLate Classical and Early Christian Georgian societywith the natural world.
brinjaos es sakidi, romelic irmis gamosaxulebas warmoadgens, gvianantikuri da adreqristianuli sazogadoebis bunebasTan damokidebulebas asaxavs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor160
the site contained other interesting artifacts, such as a roman lamp and a parthian silver drachma (coin) of King Gotarzes I. The latter suggests that the Kartli (Iberian) Kingdom was actively involved in Roman-Parthian political and economic relationships connected with the Silk road. a small fragment of red terracotta with animal figures—some standing, others in flight—was among the finds at this site. Finally, three glass intaglios (made of glass or jewels, with carved decorations) probably date to the second half of the 1st century aD, judging by their shapes and styles. all were similar, suggesting they may have been produced in the same workshop.
Zeglze aRmoCenilia araerTi
mniSvnelovani da saintereso nivTi _
magaliTad, romauli Wraqi da vercxlis
parTuli moneta (gotarzes draqma). am
monapovrebidan kargad Cans, rom qarTlis
samefo abreSumis gzasTan dakavSirebul,
romaul-parTul politikursa da
ekonomikur urTierTobebSi iyo CarTuli.
sainteresoa terakotis, wiTeli filis
fragmenti, romelzedac cxovelebia
gamosaxuli. minis sami intalio (qvis an
minis Tvalze amokveTili gamosaxuleba),
stilis mixedviT, savaraudod, albaT, erT
saxelosnoSia damzadebuli.
This ring set with a carnelian stone illustrates thecontinued use of carnelian for personal decoration,a practice that extended from the Bronze Age intothe Middle Ages. Of 11 rings found at the Kldeburial site, two are Sassanian, eight are Roman,and one bears Christian symbols.
sardions samkaulad brinjaos xanidan iyenebdnen. kldes samarovanze aRmoCenilia sardionis Tvliani 11 beWedi; maTgan ori sasanuria, rva - romauli, erTze ki qristianuli simboloebia gamosaxuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 161
Excavations of this grave at the Klde site revealeda pair of ceramic vessels and simple bronze hoopearring. Burials from the site are associated withboth pre-Christian and early Christian societies.
kldeSi gaTxrili am samarxSi Tixis ori WurWeli da brinjaos rgolia mopovebuli. arqeologiur Zeglze aRmoCenili samarxebis nawili qristianulia, nawili - warmarTuli.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor162
Orchosani the archaeological site near the Orchosani village, located in the akhaltsikhe region of southernGeorgia (historically referred to as Samtskhe), is an excellent example of one of Georgia’s longest continuously inhabited sites. It seems to have been in use since the Lower palaeolithic Auchelian period. Surface finds include tools made of andesite and basalt (hand axes, scrapers and flakes). Its history spans from at least the Early Bronze Age (perhaps as early as the 4th millennium BC) right up to the early 17th century AD, when the settlement suffered a violent end. Only three structures remain: one from the Bronze Age Kura-Araxes culture, and two from the Medieval period. aerial views reveal a large fortified wall around the village dating to the Early Medieval period.
The 4th-3rd millennium BC was a vibrant time at the Orchosani settlement, which seems to have gone through three distinct cultural phases. the first, that of an early agricultural society, left behind only fragments of pottery, black or grey in color, similar to vessel types discovered at cave settlements in western Georgia. The Kura-Araxes culture came next, around 3,500 BC, with its distinct mud brick homes, elaborately polished black exterior and red interior pottery, and blend of agriculture and pastoralism. Orchosani yielded many artifacts in the Kura-Araxes style, including an anthropomorphic terracotta figurine. Little is known of the third culture to inhabit the site, the Bedeni. Jewelry and other metallic objects from this and earlier periods of the Bronze Age were probably imported from anatolia, as evidenced by a bronze mattock that with a higher ratio of nickel than is found in Georgia.
orWosani
samxreT saqarTveloSi, axalcixis
raionSi, istoriul provincia samcxeSi,
sofel orWosanTan aRmoCenili
mravalfeniani arqeologiuri Zegli
erT adgilze xangrZlivi da uwyveti
cxovrebis mniSvnelovani magaliTia.
am adgilze adamiani jer kidev qveda
paleoliTis, aSelur, xanaSi saxlobda,
rac aq akrefilma zedapirulma
masalam (qvis xelculebi, safxekebi
da saxokebi) daadastura. am adgilas
cxovreba adrebrinjaos xanaSi ganaxlda
(savaraudod, Zv.w. IV aTaswleulSi) da
mcire pauzebiT XVII saukunemde, soflis
ganadgurebamde grZeldeboda. milsadenebis
arealSi Seswavlilia sami nageboba: erTi
mtvar-araqsis kulturas ekuTvnis, ori ki
- Sua saukuneebisaa. aerofotoebze kargad
Cans, rom sofels Sua saukuneebSi galavani
hqonda Semortymuli.
orWosanis dasaxlebaze, Zv.w. IV-III
aTaswleulebis fenebSi sami kulturuli
periodia dafiqsirebuli. pirveli,
adresamiwaTmoqmedo sazogadoebaa,
romelmac dasavleT saqarTvelos
amave periodis Zeglebze mopovebuli
keramikis msgavsi, ruxi da Savi feris
WurWlis fragmentebi Semoinaxa. amas
mohyveba mtkvar-araqsuli fena, romelsac
Savad naprialebi zedapiri da wiTeli
Sidapiri aqvs. am periods ganviTarebuli
mesaqonleoba da miwaTmoqmedeba
axasiaTebs. orWosanis mtkvar-araqsulma
fenam mravali saintereso artefaqti
Semoinaxa: maT Soris aRsaniSnavia
terakotis anTropomorfuli figura.
Semdgomi fena bedenis kulturis periods
emTxveva. Zeglze mopovebuli samkauli da
iaraRis nawili anatoliuri warmoSobisa
unda iyos. magaliTad, brinjaos Toxis
qimiur SemadgenlobaSi ufro meti
nikelia, vidre saqarTvelos teritoriaze
mopovebul brinjaos nivTebSi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 163
This silver cross-dating to the 6th or 7th century ADis the first of its kind to be found in eastern Georgia.
vercxlis es jvari VI-VII saukuneebisaa da aRmosavleT saqarTveloSi mopovebul adreul jvarTagan erT-erTi pirvelia.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor164
although the Orchosani cemetery produced few artifacts, the surrounding settlement yielded objects spanning many time periods. the most stunning were the large 500-600 liter wine storage jars known as pithoi (a Greek term describing large storage jars of a particular shape) dating to the 12th century aD. Stone, metal, and bone objects that served a variety of purposes, from culinary to military, were also recovered. religious art from many eras was well-represented in the form of statuettes, inscriptions, and jewelry.
the impressive materials discovered at this site are all the more remarkable considering that Orchosani was completely destroyed twice. the first time was in the 10th century AD, most likely during the Seljuk turk invasions of Georgia. Orchosani was again destroyed in the 17th century AD during the Ottoman expansion of the area, causing its final demise.
This fired red ceramic drinking vessel, dating to the1st-3rd centuries AD, was found inside a pit burialnext to the deceased.
wiTlad gamomwvari I-III saukuneebis es sasmisi ormosamarxSi, micvalebulis gverdze ido.
orWosanis samarovanze arcTu
bevri artefaqtia mopovebuli,
magram namosaxlarze mravali nivTia
aRmoCenili. sainteresoa Tixis 500-
600 litriani qvevrebi, romlebic XII
saukuniT TariRdeba. Zeglze sxvadasxva
daniSnulebisa (sameurneo, sabrZolo da
sxv.) da masalis (qvis, liTonis, Zvlis)
nivTebia aRmoCenili. mcire zomis
qandakebebi, samkauli da ramdenime warwera
sxvadasxva drois religiur warmodgenebs
asaxavs.
orWosnis namosaxlari Sua saukuneebis
ganmavlobaSi orjeraa ganadgurebuli.
pirveli ngreva, rogorc Cans, seljukTa
Tavdasxmas ukavSirdeba da X saukuniT
TariRdeba. meore ki - samcxeSi otomanTa
dapyrobebis Sedegi unda iyos da igi XVII
saukuneSi unda momxdariyo.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 165
Molded terracotta figurines like this one were usedin religious practices during the second half of the3rd millennium BC.
terakotis aseTi figurebi Zv.w. III aTaswleulSi, savaraudod, religiuri miznebisaTvis mzaddeboda.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor166
turkey
Güllüdere Located in the commercially vital region known as the Erzurum Plain in Turkey, Güllüdere reveals two distinct periods of habitation. the first, dating from the Iron Age (900-300 BC), provides evidence (especially similarities in pottery styles) that the inhabitants had cultural and commercial connections with the nearby sites of tetikom and tasmasor. the second period occurred during the early Medieval period. Findings from both habitation periods include multiple structural foundations, indicating a settlement and a cemetery either nearby or inside the settlement boundary. the burial practices observed at this cemetery allow archaeologists to link Güllüdere to well-established surrounding settlements in eastern anatolia.
Of the 44 graves excavated at Güllüdere, 10 were definitively Iron age. the deceased were buried in two distinct manners, the more elaborate of which involved placing the remains in a large ceramic or terracotta jar. While the exact reasons for this practice have not been determined, it is similar to the burial styles at neighboring sites, indicating a religious link. Following the normal pattern for jar burials in this region, grave goods accompanied the bodies. those from the Iron age are believed to have consisted only of the deceased’s personal belongings. (The burial sites at Tetikom or tasmasor included elaborate gifts, whose absence at Güllüdere could be the result of grave robbing rather than different spiritual practices.) Despite the general absence of grave goods in the Güllüdere cemetery, archaeologists discovered some stone, ceramic, and metallic objects. A few were well-preserved, such as a stone seal depicting a horse, a symbolically important animal in eastern anatolia.
TurqeTi
guludere
TurqeTSi, ekonomikurad mniSvnelovan
erzerumis vakeze mdebare guluderes
namosaxlarze, Cans, rom dasaxleba or
sxvadasxva periodSi arsebobda. pirveli,
rkinis xaniT (Zv.w. 900-600) TariRdeba da
axlomdebare tetikonisa da Tamasoris
dasaxlebasTan mWidro urTierTobas
adasturebs. meore dasaxleba adre Sua
saukuneebSi funqcionirebda. orive
periodis fenebi sxvadasxva nagebobis
naSTebsa da samarovans Seicavs. samarxebSi
aRmoCenili artefaqtebi aRmosavleT
anatoliis masalasTan avlens paralelebs.
guluderes samarovanze Seswavlili
44 samarxidan 10 rkinis xanisaa. aq
dakrZalvis ori wesi dafiqsirda.
Uumeteswilad, adamianis naSTebi Tixis
did WurWelSi Tavsdeboda. dakrZalvis
am wesis axsna aqamde ar mogvepoveba da
Tu gaviTvaliswinebT, rom maxlobel
Zeglebzedac aseTive ritualia
dafiqsirebuli, igi religiur rwmenasTan
unda davakavSiroT. am samarxebSi, ise,
rogorc regionisaTvis damaxasiaTebel
qvevrsamarxebSi, micvalebulebs Tan
sxvadasxva nivTs atandnen (guluderes
samarovanis masalisagan gansxvavebiT,
Tamasorisa da telikonis samarxebSi
mdidruli inventaria). miuxedavad imisa,
rom guluderes samarovanze cotaa
samarxeuli inventari, rac Zarcvis Sedegi
unda iyos, arqeologebma mainc moipoves
qvis, Tixisa da liTonis nivTebi. zogierTi
nivTi kargadaa Semonaxuli, magaliTad, qvis
sabeWdavi, romelzec cxenia gamosaxuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 167
A Medieval Period grave stone with a clover-decoratedcross was unearthed at Güllüdere.
Sua saukuneebis samarxis qvaze, guludereSi, jvris gamosaxulebaa amokveTili.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor168
these jar burials most commonly involved children. While adults were buried this way to a lesser extent, no evidence of this was discovered at the Güllüdere cemetery. The more common practice for adults was a simple soil burial, with the deceased placed on one side in a crouching, fetal position. Notably, all but one Iron age burial site was situated with a north-south orientation, providing more evidence that the residents of Güllüdere at this time had an organized belief system and specific understanding of an afterlife.
It was difficult to analyze Güllüdere’s habitation during the Medieval period. the foundations of a few hellenistic structures were discovered but were so damaged that meaningful conclusions were impossible to draw. the graves from this period yielded even less information than those from the Iron age. a few Christian tombstones were, however, found at the site, implying thatByzantine Christian influences were present at the time of the burials.
qvevrsamarxebSi, rogorc wesi, bavSvebi
iyvnen dakrZaluli. marTalia,
qvevrsamarxebSi mozrdilebsac marxavdnen,
magram maTTvis ufro ormosamarxebia
damaxasiaTebeli. ormosamarxebSi
micvalebulebi gverdze, xelfexmokecilad,
embrionis msgavs mdgomareobaSi iwvnen.
erTi micvalebulis garda, rkinis
xanis yvela micvalebuli samxreTidan
CrdiloeTisaken iyo damxrobili, rac
rkinis xanaSi guluderes mosaxleobis
Camoyalibebul religiur rwmena-
warmodgenebze migvaniSnebs.
Znelia vimsjeloT guluderes Sua
saukuneebis mosaxleobis Sesaxeb.
marTalia, aq elinisturi xanis ramdenime
nagebobis saZirkveli aRmoCnda, magram
isini imdenad dazianebulia, rom
praqtikulad, informacias ar iZleva.
Sua saukuneebis samarxebma rkinis xanis
samarxTa monapovarTan SedarebiT mcire
masala mogvca. ramdenime qristianuli
saflavis qvis aRmoCenam daadastura, rom
aq bizantiuri gavlena Zlieri iyo.
This stone seal depicting a horse was found onthe chest of a skeleton in an Iron Age grave inGüllüdere. A hole on the reverse side could havebeen used to suspend the stone.
es qvis sabeWdavi, romelzedac cxenia gamosaxuli, guludereSi, rkinis xanis samarxSi micvalebulis mkerdze aRmoCnda. sabeWdavis meore mxares datanili xvreli mis dasamagreblad iyo gakeTebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 169
This drawing shows a utilitarian Medieval terracottajug with a folded mouth and incised decorationsaround its shoulder. It was thrown on a potterswheel and then burnished or polished.
naxatze gamosaxulia Sua saukuneebis, morgvze damzadebuli da terakotis gaprialebuli WurWeli, romelsac ornamentirebuli mxari aqvs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor170
This site plan depicts a large Iron Age complex ofdomestic structures, with associated courtyards.There is at least one hearth and one burial site inthe complex. Excavators concluded that thestructures’ walls were probably made of stone,given the apparent absence of mud brick.
Zeglis es gegma rkinis xanis nagebobebis kompleqsia. kompleqsSi erTi Rumeli da erTi samarxicaa. gaTxrebis Sedegad damtkicda, rom Senobebi qviTaa nagebi da alizi mSeneblebs ar gamouyenebiaT.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 171
This fragment of a terracotta handle has beeninterpreted as the head of an eagle. Believed todate from the Iron Age, it was part of either afree-standing figurine or a ceramic vessel.
terakotis saxeluris es fragmenti arwivis Tavis gamosaxuleba unda iyos. igi rkinis xanisaa da WurWlis an raime figuris nawili unda iyos.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor172
Ziyaretsuyu the romans were famous for their paved roads and intricate trade systems, concepts that seem elementary today but were truly innovative 2000 years ago. the roads were crucial to rome’s military efficiency and commercial prosperity. In 2003, at the Ziyaretsuyu settlement, which was along one such roman road in what is now the Sivas province of central turkey, a team from Gazi University unearthed two distinct and likely related structures. the sheer abundance of ceramics recovered from the two buildings suggests that the team uncovered only a fraction of what is likely a larger settlement. While the poor condition of the buildings’ structures suggests that the people who lived within them were not wealthy, the site was probably densely populated.
although archaeologists date the site primarily to the roman period, there is evidence it was active slightly earlier, in the 2nd century BC. architectural and ceramic elements there display some hellenistic characteristics, and a coin found in the same cultural stratigraphic layer as the excavated buildings and dated from between 105 BC and 70 BC portrays the image of Hercules. Unfortunately, the coin was so damaged that vital information such as the location of the mint was not recoverable. the coin also indicates that Ziyaretsuyu was a place of commerce linked to roman and Greek societies. If so, why were there so few architectural and metallic remnants? historians suggest that the answer lies in the geographical position of the settlement.
This terracotta statuette of a woman is characteristicof Hellenistic figurines in the region. The womanappears to be wearing a cloak over her left shoulder,a common fashion for married women.
terakotisagan damzadebuli es qandakeba elinisturi kulturis gavleniTaa Seqmnili. mas marcxena mxarze gadakidebuli mosasxami aqvs mocmuli, rac gaTxovili qalisaTvis iyo damaxasiaTebeli.
ziareTsuiu
romaelebi ganTqmulni iyvnen
mokirwyluli gzebiTa da ganviTarebuli
savaWro sistemiT, Erac dReisaTvis
gasakviri araa, magram 2000 wlis win es
didi siaxle iyo. gzebi romaelTaTvis
rogorc samxedro, ise ekonomikuri
TvalsazrisiT umniSvnelovanesi iyo. 2003
wels centralur TurqeTSi, romauli
gzis maxloblad mdebare ziareTsuius
namosaxlarze, gazis universitetis
eqspediciam ori erTmaneTTan
dakavSirebuli nageboba Seiswavla. aq
mopovebuli keramikuli masala miuTiTebs,
rom eqspediciam Zeglis mxolod mcire
nawili Seiswavla. aq mcxovrebi xalxi
mdidari ar iyo, Tumca dasaxleba sakmaod
mWidro aRmoCnda.
marTalia, Zegli romauli xaniT TariRdeba,
magram zogierTi detali migvaniSnebs,
rom aq cxovreba Zv.w. II saukuneSi daiwyo.
keramika da arqiteqturuli detalebi
elinistur elementebze migvaniSnebs,
xolo amave fenaSi mopovebuli herakles
gamosaxulebiani moneta Zv.w. 105-70
wlebiT TariRdeba. samwuxarod, moneta
iseTi dazianebuli iyo, rom misi moWris
adgili ver gairkva. monetaze dayrdnobiT
SeiZleba iTqvas, rom ziareTsuiu
savaWro adgili da berZnul-romauli
samyaros nawili iyo. Tuki es asea,
maSin ratomaa aq ase mcire raodenobis
arqiteqturuli detalebi da liTonis
nivTebi? istorikosebis azriT, es Zeglis
mdebareobiTaa ganpirobebuli.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 173
This display shows a sample of the diverse potterytypes found at Ziyaretsuyu. The sheer volume andvariety of the ceramic vessels suggest a denselypopulated settlement along a trade route.
am suraTze ziareTsuiuSi mopovebuli sxvadasxva tipis Tixis WurWelia warmodgenili. WurWlis simravle da mravalferovneba mWidro dasaxlebasa da savaWro gzasTan siaxloveze miuTiTebs.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor174
A few ceramic vessels discovered at Ziyaretsuyuwere decorated with the ivy heart-shaped motif areshown here. This rare style is a remnant of an IronAge ceramic tradition that persisted into the RomanPeriod in some areas.
ziareTsuiuSi mopovebuli Tixis zogierTi WurWeli gulis formis suros ornamentiTaa Semkuli. es motivi rkinis xanidanaa SemorCenili da romauli xanis keramikaSic iCens Tavs.
Ziyaretsuyu was situated in a region neighboring the highland Galatians to the west and Cappadocians to the south. Consistent pillaging by these advanced societies likely affected the residents of Ziyaretsuyu and could explain the scarcity of prestige items, such as jewelry and other metallic objects, along with construction styles consistent with a simple seasonal (hence poor) settlement. With warfare continuously destroying their structures, the residents might have had less incentive or economic ability to rebuild lavish homes. these theories are, however, speculative, and will surely benefit from additional research and excavation at Ziyaretsuyu and related sites.
ziareTsuiu dasavleTiT galaTielebiT
dasaxlebuli mTebis maxloblad,
samxreTiT ki kapadokielebis teritoriis
siaxloves mdebareobda. am ganviTarebuli
sazogadoebebis mier dasaxlebis
xSir Zarcvas Sedegad unda gamoewvia
ziareTsuius mosaxleobis gaRaribeba da
aq fufunebis sagnebis (samkaulisa da
liTonis sxva nivTebis) ararseboba. amave
dros, Sendeboda droebiTi (e. i. Raribuli)
Senobebi. dausrulebeli brZolebis Sedegi
ngreva da axali nagebobebis asaSeneblad
saxsrebis uqonloba unda yofiliyo.
es mxolod Teoriaa, pasuxi ki Zeglis
damatebiTma Seswavlam unda mogvces.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 175
Note the eagle head tips on this bronze object,possibly a broken handle from a metallic vessel.The lower portion of the object (not seen in thisimage) displays the face of a helmeted soldier.
brinjaos WurWlis gatexil saxelurze arwivis Tavia gamosaxuli. nivTis qveda nawilze (fotoze ar Cans) muzaradiani jariskacis gamosaxulebaa.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor176
Yüceören
The necropolis of chamber tombs at Yüceören, turkey, dating from the hellenistic and roman periods (approximately 3rd century BC to 4th century AD), is located near Ceyhan, not far from the Mediterranean terminus of the pipelines. Excavated by archaeologists from Gazi University as part of the pipeline project, the chamber tombs reflect considerable investment in the final disposition of the dead. Large spaces were cut into the bedrock, there were passageways, often with steps, and stone doors closed off the burial chambers. the chambers in most cases contained one or more niches to hold the dead. It appears that the deceased were often placed in coffin-like terracotta sarcophagi. The discovery of an antechamber with the disturbed remains of nearly two dozen people suggests that, over the long history of use of the tombs, individuals’ remains were moved in order to reuse the burial niches. this antechamber appeared to be the only one of the 16 excavated tombs that had not been robbed in antiquity.
This winged youth depicted on a carnelian stoneset in a ring from the 1st century AD is Eros, theRoman Cupid and son of Aphrodite. Eros wasassociated with love, lust, and fertility.
ax.w. I saukunis beWdis sardionis Tvalze amokveTili es frTosani ymawvili erosia (romauli kupidoni). igi afrodites Svilia da siyvarulis, vnebisa da nayofierebis RvTaebad iTvleboda.
ieqeioreni
TurqeTSi, xmelTaSuazRvispira
jeihanis navTobterminalis maxloblad,
ieqeiorenSi aRmoCenili samarovani
elinisturi da romauli xaniT (Zv.w.
III – ax.w. IV saukuneebi) TariRdeba.
gazis universitetis eqspediciam
milsadenebis mSeneblobisas aq
akldamebi gaTxara.Aakldamebis asagebad
dedaqanSi amokveTili yofila didi
zomis farTobi. aqve iyo kibeebiani
gasasvlelebi; dasakrZalav kamerebs ki
qvis karebi hqondaT Sebmuli. kamerebSi,
rogorc wesi, erTi an meti niSa iyo,
romelic micvalebulis dasasveneblad
iyo gankuTvnili. micvalebulebs
Tavdapirvelad awvendnen kubosmagvar,
terakotis sarkofa*gebSi. damatebiTi
kameris Seswavlam gamoavlina or aTeulze
meti, erTmaneTSi areuli, adamianis
Zvlebis naSTebi, rac akldamis xangrZliv
funqcionirebaze migviTiTebs. rogorc
Cans, garkveuli drois Semdeg adamianebis
naSTebi am sivrceSi gadahqondaT da
niSebs axali micvalebulebisaTvis
aTavisuflebdnen. Zeglze Seswavlili 16
akldamaTa Soris mxolod es damatebiTi
kamera iyo gauZarcvavi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 177
The necropolis at Yüceören is comprised of a seriesof tombs cut into the soft bedrock. In each tomb, aset of steps led down into a burial chamber.
ieqeiorenis samarovani Sedgeba rbil qanSi amokveTili akldamebisagan. TiToeuli akldamis dasakrZalavi kamerisaken kibeebi Cadioda.
The opening to each burial chamber was closed bymassive stones in antiquity. Tomb robbers movedmost of the stones hundreds of years ago.
akldamebi masiuri qviT iyo gadaxuruli. samarxTa mZarcvelebma es qvebi aseulobiT wlis win gadawies.
Past and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor178
This photograph shows a kline, which is a nichecut into the walls of a burial chamber where theremains of individuals were placed, instead of in asarcophagus.
am fotoze naCvenebia akldamis kedlebSi amokveTili dasakrZalavi niSa. aq xdeboda micvalebuliTa sarkofa*gebidan gadmosveneba.
Despite the extensive looting, the team from Gazi University recovered an interesting range of objects. they included coins dating from the Hellenistic Period (late 3rd century BC) to the Roman Imperial Period (early 2nd century AD). the coins may have been placed in the graves to pay for passage into the underworld. Other finds included glass and ceramic unguentaria (jars for oils and lotions), which may have been left in the graves after final treatment of the bodies, and small portable lamps that family members who placed the bodies in the tombs may have left behind. One of two clay figurines depicts a child riding a horse and wearing a headdress of ivy leaves; it may have been made in the turkish city of tarsus during the late 2nd century BC.
Near the Yüceören site, the BTC pipeline bringing oil from the Caspian ends at the Mediterranean coast, the terminus of this massive engineering feat that has transformed the region’s economic landscape, and has contributed so greatly to our understanding of the cultural history of the countries through which the pipeline passes.
miuxedavad imisa, rom Zegli gaZarcvuli
iyo, gazis universitetis eqspediciam
saintereso nivTebis gamovlena
mainc SeZlo. maT Sorisaa monetebi
elinisturi xanidan (Zv.w. III s.) romis
imperiul periodamde (ax.w. II s.).
monetebi micvalebulis im qveyanaSi
gasamgzavreblad aucilebeli atributi
iyo. akldamebSi aRmoCenilia minis
sanelsacxebleebic, romlebsac samarxebSi
micvalebulTa gapatiosnebis Semdeg
tovebdnen, aqve iyo patara Wraqebic,
romlebic cxedris dakrZalvis Semdeg
ojaxis wevrebs unda daetovebinaT.
sainteresoa Tixis ramdenime figura,
romlebic cxenze amxedrebul bavSvs
gamosaxavs. ivaraudeba, rom maT Zv.w. II
saukunis dasasruls qalaq tarsusSi
amzadebdnen.
baqo-Tbilisi-jeihanis navTobsadeni,
romlis saSualebiT kaspiis zRvis navTobi
xmelTaSua zRvis sanapiros ukavSirdeba,
ieqeiorenis maxloblad mTavrdeba da
jeihanis terminals uerTdeba. am giganturi
sainJinro nagebobis mSeneblobam regionis
ekonomikuri cxovreba Secvala da didi
wvlili Seitana im qveynebis istoriis
SeswavlaSi, romelTa teritoriazec
navTobsadeni gadis.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 179
This terracotta figurine depicts a child riding a horseand wearing a cape and possibly an ivy garland.The figurine probably dates from the period ofRoman burials at the site, beginning in the 2ndcentury AD.
terakotis am figuraze cxenze amxedrebuli bavSvia gamoxatuli, romelsac Tavze suros gvirgvini adgas. qandakeba ax.w. II saukuniT, samarovanze romaelTa dakrZalvis dawyebis xaniT, TariRdeba.
The remains of a large jar are lifted carefully froman excavation block in Georgia.
saqarTvelos teritoriaze aRmoCenili mozrdili WurWeli gaTxrebis adgilidan frTxilad amoaqvT.
The site of Ziyaretsuyu in Sivas Province, Turkey,painstakingly excavated, was one of the sites in thepipeline corridor that yielded important discoveries.
TurqeTSi, sivaSis provinciaSi, ziareTsuius ubanze Catarebulma skrupulozurma gaTxrebma milsadenis mSeneblobis am monakveTze mniSvnelovan aRmoCenebs daudo safuZveli.
St. George’s Church at Tadzrisi Monastery, restoredas part of BP’s cultural heritage program in Georgia, continues to play an important role for worshippers in the local community. This ceremony took place after restoration of the sacred monument was completed.
saqarTveloSi milsadenebis mSeneblobis kulturuli memkvidreobis programis farglebSi aRdgenili taZrisis wminda giorgis eklesia adgilobrivi mosaxleobisaTvis udidesi mniSvnelobis mqonea. sazeimo ceremonia am wminda salocavis aRdgenis Semdeg Catarda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor184
Chapter 4
Nurturing a Shared heritage
archaeology allows people to learn more about past civilizations and the story of humankind. It provides a
sense of identity and understanding not just of human diversity, but also of the interconnectedness of societies over time. It can be used to mobilize tourism and economic development. and it can be used to advance the discovery and application of scientific techniques.
arqeologiuri gaTxrebis
saSualebiT gardasuli
civilizaciebisa da,
zogadad, kacobriobis
istoriis Sesaxeb umniSvnelovanesi
informaciis moZieba xdeba. ikveTeba
sxvadasxva xalxis mravalferovnebis
suraTebi, warmoCindeba sruliad
gansxvavebul sazogadoebebSi
arsebuli msgavsebebi da kavSirebi.
arqeologiuri kvlevebi turizmisa
da ekonomikuri ganviTarebis
stimuladac SeiZleba iqces da
samecniero teqnologiebis danergvas
Seuwyos xeli.
Tavi 4
vufrTxildebiT saerTo memkvidreobas
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 185
Najaf Museyibli (left) and Fikret Orujovexplain the Azerbaijani archaeological recoveryprocess to a local reporter.
najaf museibli (marcxniv) da fiqreT orujovi azerbaijanel Jurnalists gaTxrebis process acnoben.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor186
The pipeline project marks a significant advance in archaeology in the Caucasus, and has helped cast new light on the region’s past. through exemplary excavation, multi-disciplinary analysis of findings, and dissemination through a wide range of media, most notably exhibitions and publications, the project has increased understanding of the region’s archaeological record.
Equally important, through the AGT Pipelines archaeology program, the project is playing a critical role in building capacity by nurturing institutions in the host countries so that they are better able to work on their own consistent with international standards. the project has gone beyond the immediate requirements specific to the archaeological work to undertake, as well, long-term engagement to strengthen local institutions that deal with the environment, cultural heritage, material culture, scientific, educational, and other areas relevant to the project. Local professionals have been able to extend their knowledge in many areas, such as project management; analyses and syntheses of findings; and conservation of the artifacts found. Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey are now positioned to approach archaeological projects with greater creativity and flexibility. Increased commitment will enable them to fully utilize the talents of well-trained professionals to uncover more of their fascinating pasts. The AGT pipelines archaeology program will continue to emphasize capacity-building of organizations in the cultural heritage sector. this chapter reviews the specific efforts developed for each country and the wider public outreach initiatives.
milsadenebis samSeneblo proeqtma
mniSvnelovnad Seuwyo xeli samxreT
kavkasiaSi arqeologiur kvlevebsa da
regionis warsulis axleburi kuTxiT
warmoCenas. misi mimdinareobisas gaTxrebis,
mopovebuli masalis multidisciplinuli
analizis, media-saSualebebis gamoyenebis,
gamofenebisa da publikaciebis saSualebiT
regionis arqeologiuri memkvidreobis
ukeT Seswavla moxerxda.
Bp-sa da misi partniorebis mier SemuSavebuli kulturuli memkvidreobis
programis farglebSi mniSvnelovan
rols TamaSobs e.w. “SesaZleblobaTa
ganviTarebis” programa, romelic
kulturuli memkvidreobis adgilobriv
organizaciebs saerTaSoriso standartebis
danergvaSi exmareba. programa uSualod
arqeologiuri miznebis farglebsac
gascda da grZelvadiani kontaqtebi
daamyara garemosdacviT, kulturuli
memkvidreobis, materialuri kulturis,
samecniero, saganmanaTleblo da sxva
dargebSi momuSave organizaciebTan.
adgilobriv kadrebs saSualeba miecaT
SeeZinaT da gaemdidrebinaT codna
sxvadasxva sferoSi: proeqtis marTvaSi,
mopovebuli masalis analizsa da
artefaqtebis konservaciaSi. azerbaijanSi,
saqarTvelosa da TurqeTSi miRebuli
gamocdilebis Sedegad, specialistebi meti
kreatiulobiT moekidebian arqeologiur
proeqtebs da met moqnilobas gamoiCenen.
amavdroulad, gazrdili pasuxismgeblobis
wyalobiT isini TavianTi niWisa da codnis
ukeT gamoyenebas SeZleben. milsadenebis
arqeologiuri programa kvlavac
gaagrZelebs kultutuli memkvidreobis
seqtorSi momuSave organizaciebis
mxardaWeras. am TavSi mimoxilulia is
specifiuri mcdelobebi da iniciativebi,
romlebic TiToeuli qveynisaTvis
SemuSavda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 187
David Maynard, an archaeologist from Wales,assisted BP with the administration of the culturalheritage program in Azerbaijan from the start ofpipeline planning through the preparation oftechnical reports.
uelseli arqeologi devid meinardi Bp-is exmareboda azerbaijanSi kulturuli memkvidreobis programis administrirebaSi mSeneblobis dasawyisidan mis damTavrebamde.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor188
azerbaijani
azerbaijanSi Bp-m da misma partniorebma daafinanses arqeologiuri kvlevebi
da adgilobrivi dawesebulebebis
“SesaZleblobaTa ganviTarebis” programa.
Amis magaliTad SeiZleba movixmoT
2005 wels gamarTuli arqeologiis,
eTnografiisa da folkloristikis
kongresi, romelSic azerbaijanisa da
kavkasiis sxva qveynebis 100-ze meti
warmomadgeneli monawileobda. BP-
is Zalisxmeva agreTve mimarTuli iyo
im dawesebulebebis SesaZleblobebis
gasazrdelad, romlebic artefaqtebis
dacvasa da sazogadoebisaTvis wardgenaze
arian pasuxismgebeli. amis magaliTia
goranbois raionis mxareTmcodneobis
muzeumis rekonstruqcia, sadac amave
raionSi gaTxrili borsunlus yorRanis
masala inaxeba. es iniciativa nawilia
ufro farTo mcdelobisa, raTa baqos
arqeologiisa da eTnografiis institutSi
koleqciebis marTvis ufro maRali
standartebi danergiliyo. institutma
miiRo aRWurviloba da koleqciebis
Sesenaxaad saWiro gamocdileba. amave
dros, Seiqmna da aRiWurva konservaciis
laboratoria, ganisazRvra konservaciis
wesebi. xuTma arqeologma gaiara
specialuri treningi konservaciis
sferoSi.
ganaTleba da sazogadoebaze
orientirebuli programebi erTerTi
mniSvnelovani mimarTulebaa, romelic
xels uwyobs gaTxrebze informaciis
sajarobasa da xelmisawvdomobas. es
wigni da masTan dakavSirebuli vebgverdi
aRniSnuli Zalisxmevis kargi nimuSia.
“kaspiis energiis centri” sangaCalis
navTobisa da gazis terminalis
mnaxvelebs sTavazobs gamofenebsa da
saganmanaTleblo RonisZiebebs. maT
aTasobiT skolis moswavle stumrobs.
programebis monawileebs saSualeba
aqvT, miiRon informacia milsadenis
mniSvnelobaze, agreTve, misi mSeneblobisas
aRmoCenil kulturul memkvidreobaze.
Azerbaijan In Azerbaijan, BP and its coventurers have sponsored scientific efforts to study the archaeological finds of the project and undertaken capacity-building measures to strengthen local institutions in the region. For example, over 100 scholars from Azerbaijan and the broader Caucasus region attended a 2005 Conference on archaeology, ethnology, and Folklore. Other efforts have deepened the capabilities of the institutions responsible for long-term preservation of artifacts and their presentation to the public. the refurbishment of the Museum of history and Local Studies located in the Goranboy District, which preserves and displays finds from the nearby excavation site of Borsunlu Kurgan, is an example. this initiative was part of a broader effort to facilitate the establishment of standards for collections management at the Institute of archaeology and ethnography in Baku, which manages numerous collections from project excavations. The Institute also received equipment and expertise needed to properly maintain the collections: a conservation laboratory was established and outfitted; protocols for long-term conservation of collections developed; and five archaeologists given conservation training.
education and public outreach—making information about the excavation sites in Azerbaijan available to the public—were other important areas of activity. this book and the associated website are two examples of this effort. the Caspian energy Center in the Sangachal oil and gas terminal at the edge of the Caspian Sea provides visitors, including thousands of school children, with engaging exhibition and educational activities that explain the significance of the pipelines and the cultural heritage unearthed during its construction.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 189
Recovery of large storage vessels from a site nearTovuz, Azerbaijan, required painstaking extractionand preservation.
azerbaijanSi, Tovuzis maxloblad, aRmoCenili didi zomis WurWlis amoReba garkveul siZneleebTan iyo dakavSirebuli.
Excavations near Gyrag Kasaman, Azerbaijan,exposed several burial sites from the Antique Period.
azerbaijanSi, girag qasamanis maxloblad antikuri xanis samarxebi aRmoCnda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor190
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 191
The Nizami Museum of Literature in Baku,Azerbaijan, is named for the 12th century poetfrom Ganja, considered the greatest romanticepic poet.
azerbaijanSi, baqos literaturis muzeumi XII saukunis didi sparsi poetis nizami ganjelis saxels atarebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor192
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 193
Archaeologists from Georgia’s Center forArchaeological Studies record a site along theBTC pipeline.
saqarTveloSi BtC –is milsadenze arqeologiuri centris TanamSromlebi arqeologiur Zegls afiqsireben.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor194
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 195
Azerbaijani and Georgian cultural heritagespecialists observe CAT scanning equipmentwith Dr. Bruno Frohlich, Smithsonian Institution,during meetings at the Smithsonian Institution inOctober 2008.
smiTsonis institutSi, 2008 wlis oqtomberSi gamarTul Sexvedraze qarTveli da azerbaijaneli specialistebi doqtor bruno frolixTan erTad Cat- is tipis skaners aTvaliereben.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor196
Archaeologist Lali Akhalaia, Cultural HeritageCoordinator Dawn Alexander, Cultural HeritageMonitor Nino Erkomaishvili, and Project Directorand Senior Architect Merab Bochoidze discussthe next steps during the restoration of TadzrisiMonastery in Georgia.
arqeologebi lali axalaia, kulturuli memkvidreobis koordinatori don aleqsanderi, kulturuli memkvidreobis monitori nino erqomaiSvili da proeqtis avtori, merab boWoiZe ganixilaven taZrisis monastria aRdgeniTi samuSaoebis Semdgom etapebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 197
The main fortress wall at Sakire in Georgia istied by an archway to the wall that encirclesthe courtyard. sakireSi (saqarTvelo) cixesimagris mTavari kedeli TaRiT ukavSirdeba Sida ezos kedels.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor198
Georgia Georgian scholars, scientists, and preservationists had many of the same needs as their counterparts in Azerbaijan, but also some unique ones. For example, the project supported extensive architectural studies to minimize the impacts on standing monuments and furthered the restoration of specific historical structures on or near the pipeline route. The Georgian Cultural Heritage Protection Department played a large role in determining a route that would ensure that the most significant sites near the project right-of-way were avoided. Most efforts focused on planning protective measures for at-risk sites, and specific protection or mitigation measures were developed for each of them.
an excellent example is the approach taken to ensure conservation and preservation of the tadzrisi Monastery complex. the complex consists of two churches standing side by side, St. George’s (a three-nave basilica) and St. Mary’s, as well as the ruins of a monastery building. the monastery was the most important ecclesiastic center in the 10th-15th centuries AD in Georgia; its origin is associated with eminent Georgian religious leaders in the early Middle ages. It was temporarily abandoned following an invasion by the Ottoman Turks in the 1550s. St. George’s Church is the most prominent remnant of the monastery and a pilgrimage site for Georgians to this day. Although the ruins of the Monastery are not directly on the pipeline route, BtC/SCp funded conservation and restoration of both churches and the monastery’s courtyard.
saqarTvelo
qarTvel mecnierebs TavianTi
azerbaijaneli kolegebis msgavi
problemebi hqondaT, Tumca, maT
Soris sakmao gansxvavebac arsebobda.
kulturuli memkvidreobis proeqtis
farglebSi mSeneblobis dawyebamde,
intensiuri samuSaoebi Catarda
milsadenebis siaxloves arsebuli
arqiteqturuli Zeglebis dacvis
mizniT. saqarTvelos ZeglTa dacvis
departamentma didi roli iTamaSa
milsadenis iseTi marSrutis amorCevaSi,
rom mas mniSvnelovani ZeglebisaTvis
gverdi aevlo. gansakuTrebuli Zalisxmeva
moxmarda sarisko arqiteqturuli
Zeglebis SeZlebisdagvarad dacvas.
amisTvis SemuSavda specialuri dacviTi
RonisZiebebi.
amis TvalsaCino magaliTia is midgoma,
romelic taZrisis samonastro kompleqsis
dacvisa da aRdgenisaTvis SemuSavda.
kompleqsi gverdi-gverd mdgari wminda
giorgisa (samnaviani eklesia) da wm.
mariamis monastris nangrevebisagan
Sedgeboda. es monasteri X-XV saukuneebSi
saqarTvelos erT-erTi mniSvnelovani
sulieri centri gaxldaT. misi daarseba
adre Sua saukuneebis saqarTvelos
udides religiur moRvaweTa saxelebs
ukavSirdeba. 1550 wels otomanTa imperiis
Semosevis Sedegad monasterma arseboba
Sewyvita. wminda giorgis eklesia
samonastro kompleqsis mTavari nagebobaa,
romelSic momlocvelebi dRemde dadian.
marTalia, kompleqsis nangrevebi uSualod
milsadenis marSrutze ar mdebareobs,
magram Bp-im da misma partniorebma orive eklesiis aRdgena daafinansa.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 199
the result is an aesthetically pleasing and historically accurate site with two fully operational historic churches. In a letter of gratitude to BP, local residents wrote, “this was a sign of great respect towards Georgian cultural heritage…[which] strengthened our positive attitude towards pipeline construction.”
In addition to these preservation efforts, the project has supported two museum exhibitions of some of the exciting finds unearthed along the pipeline route. In 2005 the Janashia State Museum (now part of Georgian National Museum) hosted the “First Oil Celebration,” where the Company presented an exhibition of outstanding archaeological finds. On July 2, 2009 the Georgian National Museum, together with Bp and its partners, inaugurated the exhibition, “pipeline Construction and archaeological Finds” at the Samtskhe-Javakheti History Museum in Akhaltsikhe, in southern Georgia. The exhibition contains up to 800 artifacts from the paleolithic to the Middle ages that were unearthed during the pipeline construction. the museum itself was partially renovated for the occasion.
Sedegad miviReT esTetikurad
sasiamovno da pirvandeli saxiT
aRdgenili, ori moqmedi eklesia. Bp-sadmi miweril samadlobelo werilSi
adgilobrivi mosaxleoba aRniSnavs,
rom “es iyo saqarTvelos kulturuli
memkvidreobisadmi gamoCenili
didi pativiscema, ramac milsadenis
mSeneblobisadmi Cveni dadebiTi
damokidebuleba kidev ufro ganamtkica”.
amas garda, proeqtis farglebSi
ganxorcielda axalaRmoCenili
arqeologiuri masalis saintereso
gamofeebi. 2005 wels s. janaSias saxelobis
saxelmwifo muzeumSi (romelic dRes
erovnuli muzeumis nawilia) gaimarTa
“pirveli navTobisadmi” miZRvnili
arqeologiuri gamofena. 2009 wlis
2 ivliss, saqarTvelos erovnulma
muzeumma Bp-sa da mis partniorebTan
erTad axalcixis samcxe-javaxeTis
istoriis muzeumSi moawyo gamofena
“milsadeni da arqeologiuri aRmoCenebi”.
Ggamofenaze gamotanili iyo milsadenis
mSeneblobisas aRmoCenili sxvadasxva
periodis 800 eqsponati, paleoliTidan
– Suasaukunebamde. am movlenasTan
dakavSirebiT moxda muzeumis nawilobrivi
ganaxlebac.
Specialists from Georgia’s Center forArchaeological Studies clean and conserveartifacts from excavations in that nation.
saqarTvelos arqeologiuri centris TanmSromlebi asufTaveben da konservacias ukeTeben aRmoCenil artefaqtebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor200
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 201
Restoring the domed roof of St. Mary’s Churchat Tadzrisi in Georgia involved replacing missingstones and securing loose ones.
taZrisSi (saqarTvelo) wm. mariamis eklesiis TaRovani gadaxurvis aRsadgenad moryeuli qvebi gaamagres.
Interior of the restored St. George church in TadzrisiMonastery.
taZrisis wminda giorgis aRdgenili eklesiis interieri.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor202
Prior to restoration work, the small St. Mary’sChurch in Tadzrisi in Georgia, although overgrownwith vegetation and in ruins, was still visited by local Georgians.
mcenareuli safariT dafarul da nangrevebad qceul taZrisis wm. mariamis eklesias aRdgenamdec ar aklda momlocvelebi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 203
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor204
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 205
This cross was inscribed into the sandstoneabove a lintel of St. George’s Church in Tadzrisiin Georgia.
es jvari taZrisis wm. giorgis eklesiis sarkmlis zRudarzea amokveTili.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor206
Yüceören site report published by Gazi University in 2006.
ieqeronis gaTxrebis angariSi gazis universitetma 2006 wels gamosca.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 207
Archaeologists from Georgia’s Center forArchaeological Studies review data gatheredalong the pipeline. saqarTvelos arqeologiuri centris TanmSromlebi milsadenis teritoriaze mopovebul masalas akvirdebian.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor208
turkey Cultural heritage efforts in Turkey under the pipeline project have focused mainly on capacity building at the regional museums where most of the collections from the excavations were deposited. the museums are located in the provinces of Kars, erzurum, Sivas, Kahramanmaras, and adana, which lie along the route. the project began with needs assessments developed by the directorates for the museums, and has involved investment in equipment, training, and publications. The project undertook the capacity-building work in turkey in conjunction with the association of archaeologists, Gazi University, and the British Institute of archaeology, all in ankara.
an additional result of the archaeology program in turkey has been an internationally recognized series of illustrated publications on the sites excavated along the pipeline. the Smithsonian Institution’s AGT project website (http://www.agt.si.edu ) has posted original Azerbaijani, Georgian and turkish excavation site reports.
TurqeTi
TurqeTSi milsadenebis samSeneblo
proeqtis kulturuli memkvidreobis
programa ZiriTadad mimarTuli iyo im
regionaluri muzeumebis SesaZleblobaTa
gazrdaze, sadac milsadenis arealSi
mopovebuli masala inaxeboda (yarsis,
erzrumis, sivaSis, yaramanmarisa da adanas
muzeumebi). proeqti daiwyo im saWiroebaTa
da moTxovnaTa SefasebiT, romlebic
muzeumebis direqtorebma SeimuSaves.
analizis Sesabamisad, gamoiyo investiciebi
muzeumis aRsaWurvad, TanamSromelTa
treningebisa da publikaciebisaTvis.
“SesaZleblobaTa gazrdis” es proeqti
ankaris arqeologTa asociaciis,
gazis universitetisa da britaneTis
arqeologiis institutis erToblivi
ZalisxmeviT ganxorcielda.
TurqeTSi arqeologiur ZeglTa aRmoCenisa
da gaTxrebis kvaldakval ilustrirebul
publikaciaTa mTeli seria gamoqveynda.
smiTsonis institutis azerbaijanul-
qarTul-Turquli proeqtis farglebSi
internetSi ganTavsda gaTxrebis
sainformacio vebgverdi http://agt.si.edu., romelSiac azerbaijanSi, saqarTvelosa
da TurqeTSi Catarebuli gaTxrebis
angariSebia motanili.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 209
Conclusion As they wind their way through Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey, the pipelines stand as symbols of a more prosperous and integrated future for the South Caucasus and eastern anatolia. But the planning and construction of the pipelines have also had a major impact on understanding the past of the region, which has long been recognized as a heartland of ancient history. the cultural heritage component of the BTC and SCP pipelines project continues to fill, gaps in our knowledge of the civilizations that occupied these ancient lands. the project will have a lasting impact on archaeological science and institutions in the host countries. It will surely continue to encourage cooperation in understanding and appreciating this region’s common heritage that is such an important part of the shared heritage of people everywhere.
daskvna
azerbaijanis, saqarTvelosa da TurqeTis
teritoriebze gamavali milsadenebi
samxreT kavkasiasa da aRmosavleT
anatoliaSi ufro warmatebuli da
integrirebuli momavlis simboloebad
iqcnen. milsadenebis daproeqtebam
da mSeneblobam aseve xeli Seuwyo im
regionis warsulis kvlevas, romelic
uZvelesi civilizaciebis erT-erT
akvnad iTvleba. BtC da SCp proeqtebis wyalobiT mdidrdeba Cveni codna im
civilizaciaTa Sesaxeb, romlebic am
uZveles miwebze arsebobda. proeqti
kidev moaxdens gavlenas maspinZeli
qveynebis arqeologiuri mecnierebis
da institutebis ganviTarebaze,
xels Seuwyobs am regionis saerTo
kulturuli memkvidreobis Seswavlasa da
TanamSromlobis iniciativebs.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor210
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 211
“Pipelines awaken ancient history” archaeological exhibition in the Caspian Energy Centre at BP operated Sangachal oil and gas terminal.
arqeologiuri gamofena “navTobsadenebi da gamoRviZebuli istoria” kaspiis energetikis centrSi, Bp-is mier marTul sangaCalis terminalSi.A
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor212
acknowledgements
the volume presents information on some of the extraordinary treasures discovered during of the construction of the BtC
and SCp pipelines and celebrates the new archaeological contributions uncovered during field work beginning in 2003 in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey. the volume is part of a larger cultural heritage program, sponsored by Bp and its coventurers in the Caspian projects. the authors thank Bp for its support of this publication, which provides examples of the historic sites and artifacts unearthed during the excavations and underscores the cultural connections among peoples from the region. We extend our sincere gratitude to BP staff: Ismail Miriyev, elnara huseynova and Nino erkomaishvili for their advice and patience during the production of this book. they provided continuing encouragement as well as invaluable access to site materials and introductions to pertinent scholars, images, and ideas. their cooperation and substantive comments greatly enriched and improved the book. We also thank Gunesh alakbarova and turkhan ahmadov for proofreading the Azerbaijani text.
madloba gaweuli samuSaosaTvis
am wignSi Sesulia informacia
azerbaijanSi, saqarTvelosa
da TurqeTSi 2003 wels
dawyebuli BtC da SCp milsadenebis mSeneblobisas
aRmoCenili mdidari arqeologiuri
masalis Sesaxeb. wigni im
kulturuli memkvidreobis
programis nawilia, romelic
Bp-m da misma partniorebma daafinanses. avtorebi misi gamocemis
xelSewyobisaTvis Bp-is did madlobas uxdian. publikaciaSi
uxvadaa mocemuli informacia
arqeologiuri gaTxrebis Sedegad
aRmoCenili arqeologiuri
masalebisa da Zeglebis Sesaxeb,
agreTve gamaxvilebulia yuradReba
regionis xalxTa kulturul
kavSirebze. wignze muSaobisas
gaweuli daxmarebisaTvis gvsurs
didi madliereba gamovxatoT
Bp-is TanamSromlebis: ismail
mirievis,Eelnara huseinovasa da
nino erqomaiSvilis mimarT. isini
Tavdauzogavad gvedgnen mxarSi da
yvelanairad gviwyobdnen xels, raTa
CvenTvis xelmisawvdomi gamxdariyo
ara marto masalebi, aramed, maT
Sesaxeb mecnierTa mier gamoTqmuli
mosazrebanic. maTma daxmarebam,
saqmis koordinaciam da profesiulma
SeniSvnebma didwilad gaaumjobesa am
wignis Sinaarsi da xarisxi.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 213
The Smithsonian’s preparation of the AGT archive database (used for the development of this book and its website, and shared with our counterpart institutions in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey) has benefitted from the support and expertise of Dr. Najaf Museyibli and Ziya Hajili at the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography; Dr. Malahat Farajova, Director of the Gobustan National Historical-Artistic Preserve; Dr. David Lordkipanidze, General Director of National Museum of Georgia and Dr. Mikheil Tsereteli of the Georgian National Museum; and Dr. Vakhtang Shatberashvili of the Georgian Archaeological research Center; and many others. For help with Georgian archaeological data, visiting researcher Irakli Pipia (Tbilisi State University) brought to the Smithsonian in Washington his helpfulness, good humor and tireless translations of Georgian archaeological site reports. Guram Kvirkvelia, an esteemed Georgian archaeologist, also provided assistance. Besarion Maisuradze, the Deputy General Director for Science and Head of the archaeological research Center, was always supportive. Mrs. Nino Nadaraia helped edit the Georgian texts. Chingiz Samadzada, an Azerbaijani photographer, and Gabriel Salinker, photographer at the Georgian National Museum, supplied many of the images for this book. the embassies of Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Turkey in Washington, D.C., also furnished outstanding photographs. Mikheil Tsereteli, Tamara Kokochashvili, Giorgi Mindorashvili, and Teimuraz Gotsadze, all from Georgia, along with Najaf Müseyibli, Malahat Farajova, and Ziya Hajili from Azerbaijan, visited Washington, D.C. for two weeks in October 2008 to participate in our international museum capacity building program. each also had a role in helping to prepare this volume. Continuing correspondence with David Maynard also helped the project from its initial conceptualization to its completion.its completion.
smiTsonis institutSi Tavmoyrili masalis
(romelicAam wignisa da vebgverdis
mosamzadeblad azerbaijanis, saqarTvelosa
da TurqeTis Sesabamisi dawesebulebebis
daxmarebiT Segrovda) damuSavebaSi
didi wvlili Seitanes: doqtorma najaf
museiblim da zia hajilim (azerbaijanis
arqeologiisa da eTnografiis instituti),
gobusTanis erovnuliHistoriuli
nakrZalis direqtorma, doqtorma malahaT
farajovam, saqarTvelos erovnuli
muzeumis generalurma direqtorma
profesorma daviT lorTqifaniZem, aseve,
mixeil wereTelma, (saqarTvelos erovnuli
muzeumi), doqtorma vaxtang SatberaSvilma
(saqarTvelos arqeologiuri kvlevis
centri) da mravalma sxvam. saqarTvelos
arqeologiuri masalis gaazrebaSi
dagvexmara irakli fifia, romelmac
qarTuli arqeologiuri Zeglebis
gaTxrebis angariSebis Targmanze
dauRalavi muSaobisas SesaSuri iumoris
grZnobac gamoamJRavna. daxmarebisaTvis
madlobas vuxdiT pativcemul qarTvel
arqeologs, doqtor guram kvirkvelias,
agreTve saqarTvelos erovnuli
muzeumisAarqeologiis centris
xelmZRvanels, doqtor besarion
maisuraZes. qarTul teqstze gaweuli
muSaobisas stilisturi Sesworebebi
Seitana doqtorma nino nadaraiam.
fotografebma, Cingiz samadzadem
(azerbaijani) da gabriel salnikerma
(saqarTvelos erovnuli muzeumi)
wignSi Sesuli fotoebis didi nawili
gadaiRes. fotoebi agreTve mogvawodes
saqarTvelos, azerbaijanisa da TurqeTis
saelCoebma vaSingtonSi. 2008 wlis
oqtomberSi SesaZleblobaTa gazrdis
orkvirian saerTaSoriso SexvedraSi
monawileoba miiRes: mixeil wereTelma,
Tamar kokoCaSvilma, giorgi mindoraSvilma,
Teimuraz gocaZem (saqarTvelo), najaf
museiblim, malahaT farajovam da zia
hajilim (azerbaijani).Yyvela maTganma
sagrZnobi wvlili Seitana am wignis
gamocemaSi. konceptualuri sakiTxebis
SemuSavebasa da mis saboloo srulyofaSi
gansakuTrebuli roli iTamaSa devid
meinardTan mimoweram.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor214
All the authors sincerely thank Dr. Süleyman Yücel Şenyurt of Gazi University for his detailed and helpful comments as a peer reviewer for the Turkish sites and text and Dr. Vakhtang Shatberashvili for his careful review of the entire text. the Smithsonian team (paul Michael taylor, Christopher R. Polglase, Jared M. Koller, and Troy A. Johnson) extend our thanks to Dr. Najaf Museyibli of Baku’s Institute of archaeology and ethnography, who joined us as co-author. this co-authorship is even more appropriate since the synthesizing efforts of all the authors derive, in the case of the Azerbaijani data, from largely unpublished field reports prepared by the institute represented by Dr. Najaf Museyibli. This book’s content reflects our collegial understanding that, even though the periodization of history and the interpretation of specific archeological facts may vary within each country’s traditions of scholarship, we all gain much from attempting to share and synthesize data across borders in ways that reflect and build our shared understanding.
Within the Smithsonian Institution, many merit our gratitude. Gregory P. Shook, Samantha Grauberger, and Lance Costello helped organize the October 2008 international museum capacity building program. Michael Tuttle, Webmaster of the Smithsonian Institution, along with Jared M. Koller, developed the website associated with this volume, a process that elicited numerous ideas later incorporated into this book. Christopher Lotis and Whitney Watriss meticulously copyedited the text. We benefited from the assistance of numerous other colleagues including Yeonkyung Bae, Delores Clyburn, Catherine Fletcher, halina Izdebska, Daniele Lauro, Matt McInnes, Mark Mulder, Ian Parker, Zaborian Payne, Robert Pontsioen, Michelle reed, Nancy Shorey, William Bradford Smith, Karen Sulmonetti, Saw Sandi Tun, and Janet Yoo.
avtorebi did madlobas uxdian doqtor
suleiman iusel seniurTs (gazis
universiteti) Turquli Zeglebis Sesaxeb
teqstis detaluri redaqtirebisa
dakomentirebisaTvis, aseve doqtor
vaxtang SatberaSvils, romelmac teqstis
redaqtirebaSi miiRo monawileoba.
smiTsonis institutis gundi (pol maikl
teilori, qristofer r. folglesis
jared m. koleri, Troi a. jonsoni)
gansakuTrebul madlobas uxdis doqtor
najaf museiblis TanaavtorobisaTvis.
marTalia, am sami qveynis mecnierebis
Sexedulebebi specifiur arqeologiuri
sakiTxebis interpretacia sakmaod
gansxvavebulia, magram Cven SevecadeT es
monacemebi garkveulwilad Segvejerebina,
raTa am wignSi Cveni saerTo midgomebi
asaxuliyo.
G
gvinda didi madliereba gamovxatoT
smiTsonis institutis TanamSromlebis
mimarT. 2008 wels, muzeumebis
“SesaZleblobaTa zrdis” saerTaSoriso
Sexvedris programis momzadebaSi didi
wvlili Seitanes gregori p. Sukma, samanta
grauberma da lans kostelom. smiTsonis
institutis vebmasterma, maikl TuTlma
jared kolerTan erTad am publikaciis
vebgverdi Seadgina, romelze muSaobisas
am wignSi Sesuli araerTi ideis avtoric
aRmoCnda. qristofer loTisi da uitni
uorisi dauRalavad muSaobdnen teqstis
redaqtirebasa da koreqturaze. ieon-kung
bai,Ddelores kliberni, qeTrin fletCeri,
halina izdebska, Daniel lauro, meT makinsi,
mark mulderi, ian parkeri, zaborian peini,
robert pontsioeni, MmiSel ridi, nansi
Sori, uiliamBbredford smiTi,Kkaren
sulmoneti, sav sandi Tuni da janetYio
– es is xalxia, romelTaganac Cven
fasdaudebeli daxmareba miviReT.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 215
Finally, appreciation and thanks go to Dr. Carole Neves, director of the Smithsonian’s Office of policy and analysis, who played a vital role in introducing many of us to the Caucasus and who edited the text. her commitment to the project and her comments, insights, and suggestions were of particular importance to the book’s successful completion.
da bolos, gansakuTrebuli madloba
gvinda vuTxraT smiTsonis institutis
politikisa da analizis ofisis
xelmZRvanels, doqtor qerol nevess,
romelma bevr Cvengans gaacno kavkasia
da romelic am wignis redaqtoria.
proeqtisadmi misma erTgulebam, xedvam,
winadadebebma da SeniSvnebma wignis
warmatebiT gasrulebis saqmeSi
umniSvnelovanesi roli Seasrula.
photo credits
Unless otherwise noted, all photographs in this book were provided by Bp exploration Caspian Sea Ltd., whose extensive photographs of cultural heritage efforts form a major portion of the photographic archive assembled under the Smithsonian’s Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey (AGT) project, along with contributions from the Institute of archaeology and ethnography (Baku, Azerbaijan), Gobustan National Historical-Artistic Preserve (Baku, Azerbaijan), and the Georgian National Museum (Tbisili, Georgia). The Embassies of the Republic of Georgia (pp. 26, 40, 44-45, 80-81, 100, 104-105), and the Republic of Turkey (pp.10-11, 18-19, 26, 46-47, 107-111, 114, 118-119), the Smithsonian Institution (p. 194-195), Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography (p. 65) and Christopher R. Polglase (pp. 35, 41{on left}, 148) also contributed photographs.
fotomasala
am wignSi Sesuli yvela foto, Tuki
mas specialuri niSani ar axlavs, Bp exploration Caspian Sea Ltd–is mieraa mowodebuli. Ekulturuli memkvidreobis
amsaxveli fotomasalaPam fotoarqivis
ZiriTadi fondia da smiTsonis institutis
proeqtis – AGT-is (azerbaijani –
saqarTvelo – TurqeTi) Semadgeneli
nawilia. am masalas erTvis baqos
eTnografiisa da arqeologiis institutis
gobusTanis xelovnebisa da istoriis
erovnuli nakrZalisa da saqarTvelos
erovnuli muzeumis mier gadmocemuli
fotoebi. aqvea saqarTvelosa (gv. 26, 40, 44-45,
106) da TurqeTis respublikis (gv. 10-11, 18-19,
27, 46-47, 104, 113, 115, 117, 120, 122-123) saelCoebis,
smiTsonis institutis, vaSingtonis
kongresis biblioTekisa da qristofer
r. folgleisis mier mowodebuli
fotomasalac (gv 35, 41, 146, 188-189).
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor216
Site report Citations
Agdash (Azerbaijan, KP 194/200)Mustafayev, Mikayil. 2006. Agdash: Excavations of an Antique Period Jar Grave. Baku.
Agili Dere (Azerbaijan, KP 358)Huseynov, Fuad. 2007. Excavations of Agili Dere Settlement Site. Baku.
Akmezer (Turkey, KP 429)Görür, Muhammet; Ekmen, Hamza. 2005. Akmezer: A Hellenistic and Medieval Settlement in Cayirli. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology. Amirarkh (Azerbaijan, KP 204)Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2006. Amirarkh: Excavations of an Antique Period Wooden Coffin Grave. Baku.
Ashagi Kechili (Azerbaijan, KP 332.5)Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2007. Archaeological Work at Ashagi Kechili Settlement Site. Baku.
Asrikchai (Azerbaijan, KP 377)Museyibli, Najaf; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar; Agayev, Gahraman. 2007. Excavations of Asrikchai Settlement Site. Baku.
Atskuri Winery (Georgia, KP 211/212)Licheli, Vakhtang ; Rcheulishvili, Giorgi; Kasradze, Merab; rusishvili, r.; Kalandadze, Nino; papuashvili, Nana; Kazakhishvili, L.; Gobejishvili, Gela. 2007. Archaeological Investigation at Site IV-266/320, KP211/212, Atskuri Village, Akhaltsikhe Region. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Borsunlu Kurgan (Azerbaijan, KP 272) Qoşqarli, Qoşqar; Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Aşurov, Səfər. 2003. Borsunlu Kurqani. Baku, elm press. Boyuk Kasik (Azerbaijan, KP 438)Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Huseynov, Muzaffar. 2008. Boyuk Kasik Report: On Excavations of Boyuk Kasik Settlement at Kilometre Point 438 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way Baku.
arqeologiuri gaTxrebis angariSebi
agdaSi (azerbaijani, KP 194/200)Mustafayev, Mikayil. 2006. Agdash: Excavations of an Antique Period Jar Grave. Baku.
agili dere (azerbaijani, KP 358)Huseynov, Fuad. 2007. Excavations of Agili Dere Settlement Site. Baku.
aqmezeri (TurqeTi, KP 429)Görür, Muhammet; Ekmen, Hamza. 2005. Akmezer: A Hellenistic and Medieval Settlement in Cayirli. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology.
amirarxi (azerbaijani, KP 204)Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2006. Amirarkh: Excavations of an Antique Period Wooden Coffin Grave. Baku.
aSagi qeCili (azerbaijani, KP 332.5)Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2007. Archaeological Work at Ashagi Kechili Settlement Site. Baku.
asrikCai (azerbaijani, KP 377)Museyibli, Najaf; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar; Agayev, Gahraman. 2007. Excavations of Asrikchai Settlement Site. Baku.
awyuri (saqarTvelo, KP 211/212)Licheli, Vakhtang ; Rcheulishvili, Giorgi; Kasradze, Merab; rusishvili, r.; Kalandadze, Nino; papuashvili, Nana; Kazakhishvili, L.; Gobejishvili, Gela. 2007. Archaeological Investigation at Site IV-266/320, KP211/212, Atskuri Village, Akhaltsikhe Region. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
borsunlus yorRani (zerbaijani, KP 272)Qoşqarli, Qoşqar; Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Aşurov, Səfər. 2003. Borsunlu Kurqani. Baku, elm press. biuq qaSiqi (zerbaijani, KP 438)Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Huseynov, Muzaffar. 2008. Boyuk Kasik Report: On Excavations of Boyuk Kasik Settlement at Kilometre Point 438 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way Baku, Nafta Press.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 217
Büyükardıç (Turkey, KP 270)Şenyurt, S. Yücel. 2005. Büyükardıç: An Early Iron Age Hilltop Settlement in Eastern Anatolia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology. Chaparli (Azerbaijan, KP 335/336)aşurov, Səfər. 2008. Chaparli Report: On Excavations of Late Antique and Early Medieval Period Chapel, Settlement and Burial Site at Kilometre Points 335/336 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Chivchavi Gorge Site (Georgia, KP 087)Heritage Protection Department of Georgia. 2003. Study of the Monuments within Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Route Corridor: Phase III. Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Dashbulaq (Azerbaijan, KP 342)Hajafov, Shamil; Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Dashbulag Report: On Excavations of Dashbulag Settlement at Kilometre Point 342 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Eli Baba (Georgia, KP 116)Narimanashvili, Goderdzi. 2004. Preliminary Report on Field Excavations of Tsalka – Trialeti Archaeological Expedition for the Season 2003 on Eli-Baba (Sabechdavi) Cemetery.tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Fakhrali (Azerbaijan, KP 289)Jalilov, Bakhtiyar; Kvachidze, Viktor. 2007. Excavations of Fakhrali Settlement. Baku.
Garajamirli I & II (Azerbaijan, KP 321/323.57)Agayev, Gahraman. 2006. Excavations of Garajamirli I Settlement Site. Baku.
Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2007. Excavations of Garajamirli II Settlement. Baku,
Girag Kasaman (Azerbaijan, KP 405/406)Dostiyev, Tarikh; Kvachidze, Viktor; Huseynov, Muzaffar. 2007. Girag Kasaman Report: On Excavations of Girag Kasaman Settlement at Kilometre Point 405 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
buiuqardiCi (TurqeTi, KP 270)Şenyurt, S. Yücel. 2005. Büyükardıç: An Early Iron Age Hilltop Settlement in Eastern Anatolia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology. Caparli (azerbaijani, KP 335/336)aşurov, Səfər. 2008. Chaparli Report: On Excavations of Late Antique and Early Medieval Period Chapel, Settlement and Burial Site at Kilometre Points 335/336 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. WivWavis xeoba (saqarTvelo, KP 087)Heritage Protection Department of Georgia. 2003. Study of the Monuments within Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Route Corridor: Phase III. Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. daSulaqi (azerbaijani, KP 342)Hajafov, Shamil; Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Dashbulag Report: On Excavations of Dashbulag Settlement at Kilometre Point 342 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. eli baba (saqarTvelo, KP 116)Narimanashvili, Goderdzi. 2004. Preliminary Report on Field Excavations of Tsalka – Trialeti Archaeological Expedition for the Season 2003 on Eli-Baba (Sabechdavi) Cemetery.tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. faxrali (azerbaijani, KP 289)Jalilov, Bakhtiyar; Kvachidze, Viktor. 2007. Excavations of Fakhrali Settlement. Baku.
yarajamirli I & II (azerbaijani, KP 321/323.57)Agayev, Gahraman. 2006. Excavations of Garajamirli I Settlement Site. Baku.
Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2007. Excavations of Garajamirli II Settlement. Baku.
girag qasamani (azerbaijani, KP 405/406)Dostiyev, Tarikh; Kvachidze, Viktor; Huseynov, Muzaffar. 2007. Girag Kasaman Report: On Excavations of Girag Kasaman Settlement at Kilometre Point 405 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor218
Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Kvachidze, Viktor; Najafov, Shamil. 2008. Girag Kasaman II Report: On Excavations of Girag Kasaman II Site at Kilometre Point 406 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Güllüdere (Turkey, KP 354)Şenyurt, S. Yücel; İbiş, Resul. 2005. Güllüdere: An Iron Age and Medieval Settlement in Askale Plain. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology. Hajialili I, II & III (Azerbaijan, KP 300.98/301/302)Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2006. Excavations of Hajialili I Settlement. Baku.
Mammadov, Arif; Agayev, Gahraman. 2006. Excavations of Hajialili II Settlement. Baku.
Dostiyev, Tarikh; Mammadov, Arif. 2008. Excavations of Hajialili III Settlement. Baku.
Hasansu Kurgan (Azerbaijan, KP 398.8)Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Hasansu Necropolis Report: On Excavations of Hasansu Necropolis at Kilometre Point 398.8 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2007. Hasansu Kurgan Report: On Excavations of Hasansu Kurgan at Kilometre Point 399 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Jinisi (Georgia, KP 136)Kavavdze, eliso. Report on the palynological study of the material revealed as a result of the field works by the tsalka (kp 107-119; 136) archeological expedition.
Narimanishvili, G.; Amiranashvili, J. 2005. Report of the Trialeti Archaeological Expedition of 2004 2-36. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Kayranlıkgözü (Turkey, KP 922)Görür, Muhammet. 2005. Kayranlık: A Roman Bath in Eastern Kilikia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology.
Khojakhan (Azerbaijan, KP 361)Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Excavations of Khojakhan Settlement. Baku.
Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Kvachidze, Viktor; Najafov, Shamil. 2008. Girag Kasaman II Report: On Excavations of Girag Kasaman II Site at Kilometre Point 406 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
guludere (TurqeTi, KP 354)Şenyurt, S. Yücel; İbiş, Resul. 2005. Güllüdere: An Iron Age and Medieval Settlement in Askale Plain. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology. hajialili I, II & III (azerbaijani, KP 300.98/301/302)Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2006. Excavations of Hajialili I Settlement. Baku.
Mammadov, Arif; Agayev, Gahraman. 2006. Excavations of Hajialili II Settlement. Baku.
Dostiyev, Tarikh; Mammadov, Arif. 2008. Excavations of Hajialili III Settlement. Baku.
hasansus yorRani (azerbaijani, KP 398.8)Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Hasansu Necropolis Report: On Excavations of Hasansu Necropolis at Kilometre Point 398.8 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2007. Hasansu Kurgan Report: On Excavations of Hasansu Kurgan at Kilometre Point 399 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. jinisi (saqarTvelo, KP 136)Kavavdze, eliso. Report on the palynological study of the material revealed as a result of the field works by the tsalka (kp 107-119; 136) archeological expedition.
Narimanishvili, G.; Amiranashvili, J. 2005. Report of the Trialeti Archaeological Expedition of 2004 2-36. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. yairanlikgozli (TurqeT, KP 922)Görür, Muhammet. 2005. Kayranlık: A Roman Bath in Eastern Kilikia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology.
xojaxani (azerbaijani, KP 361)Huseynov, Muzaffar; Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Excavations of Khojakhan Settlement. Baku.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 219
Klde (Georgia, KP 225)Gambashidze, Irine; Mindiashvili, Giorgi. 2006. Archaeological Excavations at the Klde Settlement and Cemetery, Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Khunan (Azerbaijan, KP 380)Museyibli, Najaf. 2007. On Excavations of Khunan Settlement Conducted within BTC and SCP ROW at KP 380. Baku. Kodiana Kurgan (Georgia, KP 193)Gambashidze, Irine; Gogochuri, Giorgi. 2004. Report on Archaeological Excavations Carried out by an Archaeological Expedition of Borjomi District in July-August. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Ktsia Valley Site (Georgia, KP 165)Gambashidze, Irine. 2005. Ktsia Valley Ancient Settlement Site KP 165, Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Lak I & II (Azerbaijan, KP 298/300)Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2007. Excavations of Lak I Settlement. Baku.
Agayev, Gahraman. 2007. Excavations of Lak II Early Medieval Settlement. Baku. Minnetpinari (Turkey, KP 986)Tekinalp, V. Macit. 2005. Minnetpinari: A Medieval Settlement in Eastern Kilikia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology. Nachivchavebi Site (Georgia, KP 085)Shatberashvili, Zebede; Amiranashvili, Juansher; Gogochuri, Giorgi; Mindorashvili, David; Grigolia, Guram; Nikolaishvili, Vakhtang. 2005. Works of Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in 2003-2004. Tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Narimankand (Azerbaijan, KP 234/237)Agayev, Gahraman; Ashurov, Safar. 2007. Narimankand: Excavations of Earth Graves of Developed Iron Age Date. Baku.
Mustafayev, Mikayil. 2006. Narimankand: Excavations of Antique Period Jar Graves. Baku.
klde (saqarTvelo, KP 225)Gambashidze, Irine; Mindiashvili, Giorgi. 2006. Archaeological Excavations at the Klde Settlement and Cemetery, Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
xunani (azerbaijani, KP 380)Museyibli, Najaf. 2007. On Excavations of Khunan Settlement Conducted within BTC and SCP ROW at KP 380. Baku. kodianas yorRani (saqarTvelo, KP 193)Gambashidze, Irine; Gogochuri, Giorgi. 2004. Report on Archaeological Excavations Carried out by an Archaeological Expedition of Borjomi District in July-August. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. qciis veils namosaxlari (saqarTvelo, KP 165)Gambashidze, Irine. 2005. Ktsia Valley Ancient Settlement Site KP 165, Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
lak I & II (azerbaijani, KP 298/300)Dostiyev, Tarikh. 2007. Excavations of Lak I Settlement. Baku.
Agayev, Gahraman. 2007. Excavations of Lak II Early Medieval Settlement. Baku. minetpinari (TurqeTi, KP 986)Tekinalp, V. Macit. 2005. Minnetpinari: A Medieval Settlement in Eastern Kilikia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology. naWivWavebi (saqarTvelo, KP 085)Shatberashvili, Zebede; Amiranashvili, Juansher; Gogochuri, Giorgi; Mindorashvili, David; Grigolia, Guram; Nikolaishvili, Vakhtang. 2005. Works of Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in 2003-2004. Tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. narimankandi (azerbaijani, KP 234/237)Agayev, Gahraman; Ashurov, Safar. 2007. Narimankand: Excavations of Earth Graves of Developed Iron Age Date. Baku.
Mustafayev, Mikayil. 2006. Narimankand: Excavations of Antique Period Jar Graves. Baku.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor220
Orchosani (Georgia, KP 249)Baramidze, Malkhaz; Jibladze, Leri; Todua, Temur; Orjonikidze, Alexander. 2007. Comprehensive Technical Report on Archaeological Investigations at the Orchosani Site IV-323 KP 249. tbilisi: Otar Lortkipanidze archaeological Centre of the National Museum of Georgia.
Baramidze, M.; Jibladze, L.; Todua, T.; Orjonikidze, Al. 2006. Orchosani Remnant of the Settlement and Necropolis. tbilisi.
Baramidze, M.; Pkhakadze, G. 2004. Report of Akhaltsikhe Archaeological Works of 2003 (September-October). Tbilisi: Georgian academy of Sciences. Poylu I & II (Azerbaijan, KP 408.8/409.1/409.2)Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2008. Poylu II Report: On Excavations of Poylu II Settlement at Kilometre Point 408.8 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Najafov, Shamil. 2006. Poylu I Report: On Excavations of Multilayer Settlement at Kilometre Point 409.1 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2006. Poylu Report: On Excavations of Late Medieval Settlement at Kilometre Point 409.2 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Sakire Fortress (Georgia, KP 199)Gambashidze, Irine; Gogochuri, Giorgi. 2007. Archaeological Investigations at Site IV-338, KP199, Sakire Village, Borjomi District. Tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum Samedabad (Azerbaijan, KP 233)Mustafayev, Mikayil. 2006. Samedabad: Excavations of an Antique Period Earth Grave. Baku.
Saphar-Kharaba (Georgia, KP 120)Narimanishvili, Goderdzi; Amiranashvili, Juansher; Davlianidze, revaz; Murvanidze, Bidzina; Shanshashvili, Nino; Kvachadze, Marine. 2003. Report on Tsalka-Trialeti Archaeological Expedition Field Activities in September-November 2003. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Sazpegler (Turkey, KP 040)Tekinalp, Macit; Ekim, Yunus. 2005. Sazpegler: A Medieval Settlement in North Eastern Anatolia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology.
orWosani (saqarTvelo, KP 249)Baramidze, Malkhaz; Jibladze, Leri; Todua, Temur; Orjonikidze, Alexander. 2007. Comprehensive Technical Report on Archaeological Investigations at the Orchosani Site IV-323 KP 249. tbilisi: Otar Lortkipanidze archaeological Centre of the National Museum of Georgia.
Baramidze, M.; Jibladze, L.; Todua, T.; Orjonikidze, Al. 2006. Orchosani Remnant of the Settlement and Necropolis. tbilisi.
Baramidze, M.; Pkhakadze, G. 2004. Report of Akhaltsikhe Archaeological Works of 2003 (September-October). Tbilisi: Georgian academy of Sciences. foilu (azerbaijani, KP 408.8/409.1/409.2)Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2008. Poylu II Report: On Excavations of Poylu II Settlement at Kilometre Point 408.8 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Najafov, Shamil. 2006. Poylu I Report: On Excavations of Multilayer Settlement at Kilometre Point 409.1 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2006. Poylu Report: On Excavations of Late Medieval Settlement at Kilometre Point 409.2 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. sakire, (saqarTvelo, KP 199)Gambashidze, Irine; Gogochuri, Giorgi. 2007. Archaeological Investigations at Site IV-338, KP199, Sakire Village, Borjomi District. Tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum samedabadi (azerbaijani, KP 233)Mustafayev, Mikayil. 2006. Samedabad: Excavations of an Antique Period Earth Grave. Baku.
safar-xaraba (saqarTvelo, KP 120)Narimanishvili, Goderdzi; Amiranashvili, Juansher; Davlianidze, revaz; Murvanidze, Bidzina; Shanshashvili, Nino; Kvachadze, Marine. 2003. Report on Tsalka-Trialeti Archaeological Expedition Field Activities in September-November 2003. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. sazpegleri (TurqeTi, KP 040)Tekinalp, Macit; Ekim, Yunus. 2005. Sazpegler: A Medieval Settlement in North Eastern Anatolia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 221
Seyidlar I & II (Azerbaijan, KP 316/318)Huseynov, Muzaffar; Agayev, Gahraman; Ashurov, Safar. 2006. Excavations of Seyidlar Settlement. Baku.
Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Excavations of Seyidlar II Antique Period Settlement. Baku.
Shamkirchai I & III (Azerbaijan, KP 332.7/333)Museyibli, Najaf. 2008. Excavations of Shamkirchai Kurgans. Baku, Nafta Press.
Museyibli, Najaf. 2008. Excavations of Shamkirchai Kurgans III. Baku, .
Sinig Korpu (Azerbaijan, KP 357.7)Huseynov, Fuad. 2007. Excavations of Sinig Korpu Kurgan Burial. Baku.
Skhalta (Georgia, KP 080)Shatberashvili, Zebede; Nikolaishvili, Vakhtang ; Shatberashvili, Vakhtang. 2007. Report of the Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in 2005. Tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Soyuqbulaq (Azerbaijan, KP 432)Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2008. Soyugbulaq Report: On Excavations of Soyugbulaq Kurgans at Kilometre Point 432 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Tadzrisi (Georgia, KP 201)elizbarashvili, Irina; Bochoidze, Merab. Conservation and Restoration of the Church of St George at Tadzrisi Monastery.
Erkomaishvili, Nino. 2008. Tadzrisi Monastery Conservation Project.
Heritage Protection Department of Georgia. 2003. Study of the Monuments within Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Route Corridor: Phase III. Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Tasmasor (Turkey, KP 299)Şenyurt, S. Yücel. 2005. Tasmasor: An Iron Age Settlement in Erzurum Plain. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology. Tetikom (Turkey, KP 292)Şenyurt, S.Yücel; Ekmen, Hamza. 2005. Tetikom: An Iron Age Settlement in Pasinler Plain. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology.
seiidlar I & II (azerbaijani, KP 316/318)Huseynov, Muzaffar; Agayev, Gahraman; Ashurov, Safar. 2006. Excavations of Seyidlar Settlement. Baku.
Jalilov, Bakhtiyar. 2007. Excavations of Seyidlar II Antique Period Settlement. Baku.
SamkirCai I & III (azerbaijani, KP 332.7/333)Museyibli, Najaf. 2008. Excavations of Shamkirchai Kurgans. Baku.
Museyibli, Najaf. 2008. Excavations of Shamkirchai Kurgans III. Baku.
sinig korpu (azerbaijani, KP 357.7)Huseynov, Fuad. 2007. Excavations of Sinig Korpu Kurgan Burial. Baku. sxalTa (saqarTvelo, KP 080)Shatberashvili, Zebede; Nikolaishvili, Vakhtang ; Shatberashvili, Vakhtang. 2007. Report of the Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in 2005. Tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. soiuqbulaqi (azerbaijani KP 432)Müseyibli, Nəcəf. 2008. Soyugbulaq Report: On Excavations of Soyugbulaq Kurgans at Kilometre Point 432 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. taZrisi (saqarTvelo, KP 201)elizbarashvili, Irina; Bochoidze, Merab. Conservation and Restoration of the Church of St George at Tadzrisi Monastery.
Erkomaishvili, Nino. 2008. Tadzrisi Monastery Conservation Project.
Heritage Protection Department of Georgia. 2003. Study of the Monuments within Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline Route Corridor: Phase III. Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Tasmasori (TurqeTi, KP 299)Şenyurt, S. Yücel. 2005. Tasmasor: An Iron Age Settlement in Erzurum Plain. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology. tetikomi (TurqeTi, KP 292)Şenyurt, S.Yücel; Ekmen, Hamza. 2005. Tetikom: An Iron Age Settlement in Pasinler Plain. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for archaeology.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor222
Tiselis Seri (Georgia, KP 203)Gogochuri, G. 2005. Archaeological Excavations at KP 203 – Tiselis Seri Kura-Araxes Site, Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Gogochuri, George; Orjonikidze, Alexander. 2007. Comprehensive Technical Report on Archaeological Investigations at Site IV-293 Tiselis Seri KP 203. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Tkemlara Kurgan (Georgia, KP 088)Shatberashvili, Z. 2003. Works of the Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in November-December 2002, report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Shatberashvili, Z,; Amiranashvili, J.; Gogochuri, G.; Mindorashvili, D.; Grigolia, G.; Nikolaishvili, V. 2005. Works of the Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in November-December 2003-2004. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. Tovuzchai Necropolis (Azerbaijan, KP 378)Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Agayev, Gahraman; Aşurov, Səfər; Aliyev, Idris; Huseynov, Muzaffar; Najafov, Shamil; Guliyev, Farhad. 2008. Tovuzchai Necropolis Report: On Excavations of Tovuzchai Necropolis At Kilometre Point 378 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Yadili (Azerbaijan, KP 241)Farhad, Guliyev; Gahraman, Agayev. 2008. Yaldili Report: On Excavations of Yaldili Jar Burial Site At Kilometre Point 241 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Yevlakh (Azerbaijan, KP 204/204.25)Mikayil, Mustafayev. 2008. Amirarkh Report: On Excavations of an Antique Period Jar Grave At Kilometre Point 204.25 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Yüceören (Turkey, KP 1069)Şenyurt, S.Yücel; Akçay, Atakan; Kamiş, Yalçin. 2005. Yüceören: A Hellenistic and Roman Necropolis in Eastern Kilikia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology. Zayamchai Necropolis (Azerbaijan, KP 355/356)aşurov, Səfər. Zayamchay Report: On Excavations of a Catacomb Burial At Kilometre Point 355 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
Tiselis seri (saqarTvelo, KP 203)Gogochuri, G. 2005. Archaeological Excavations at KP 203 – Tiselis Seri Kura-Araxes Site, Report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Gogochuri, George; Orjonikidze, Alexander. 2007. Comprehensive Technical Report on Archaeological Investigations at Site IV-293 Tiselis Seri KP 203. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
tyemlaras yorRani (saqarTvelo, KP 088)Shatberashvili, Z. 2003. Works of the Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in November-December 2002, report. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum.
Shatberashvili, Z,; Amiranashvili, J.; Gogochuri, G.; Mindorashvili, D.; Grigolia, G.; Nikolaishvili, V. 2005. Works of the Tetritsqaro Archaeological Expedition in November-December 2003-2004. tbilisi, Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology of the Georgian National Museum. TovuzCai (azerbaijani, KP 378)Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Agayev, Gahraman; Aşurov, Səfər; Aliyev, Idris; Huseynov, Muzaffar; Najafov, Shamil; Guliyev, Farhad. 2008. Tovuzchai Necropolis Report: On Excavations of Tovuzchai Necropolis At Kilometre Point 378 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. iadili (azerbaijani, KP 241)Farhad, Guliyev; Gahraman, Agayev. 2008. Yaldili Report: On Excavations of Yaldili Jar Burial Site At Kilometre Point 241 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. evlaxi (azerbaijani, KP 204/204.25)Mikayil, Mustafayev. 2008. Amirarkh Report: On Excavations of an Antique Period Jar Grave At Kilometre Point 204.25 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
ieqeroni (TurqeTi, KP 1069)Şenyurt, S.Yücel; Akçay, Atakan; Kamiş, Yalçin. 2005. Yüceören: A Hellenistic and Roman Necropolis in Eastern Kilikia. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology. zaiamCai (azerbaijani, KP 355/356)aşurov, Səfər. Zayamchay Report: On Excavations of a Catacomb Burial At Kilometre Point 355 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus pipelines Right Of Way. Baku.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 223
Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Kvachidze, Viktor. 2006. Zayamchay Cemetery Report: On Excavations of a Muslim Cemetery At Kilometre Point 356 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. Ziyaretsuyu (Turkey, KP 714)Ortaç, Meral. 2005. Ziyaretsuyu: A Hellenistic Settlement in Upper Halys Valley. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology.
Müseyibli, Nəcəf; Kvachidze, Viktor. 2006. Zayamchay Cemetery Report: On Excavations of a Muslim Cemetery At Kilometre Point 356 of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasus Pipelines Right Of Way. Baku. ziaretsuiu (TurqeTi, KP 714)Ortaç, Meral. 2005. Ziyaretsuyu: A Hellenistic Settlement in Upper Halys Valley. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor224
recommended reading
Азербайджанская Советская Энциклопедия. Баку,1976, стр.214.
Abdushelishvili, Malkhas G. 1984. “Craniometry of the Caucasus in the Feudal Period.” Current Anthropology 25(4): 505-509.
Abich, H. 1851. “The Climatology of the Caucasus. Remarks upon the Country between the Caspian and Black Seas.” Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London 21: 1-12.
Akazawa,Takeru; Kenichi Aoki; Ofer Bar-Yosef. (ed.) 1998. Neanderthals and Modern Humans in Western Asia. New York: plenum press.
Akkieva, Svetlana. 2008. “The Caucasus: One or Many? A View from the Region.” Nationalities Papers 36(2): 253-273.
Akurgal, Ekrem. 1978. Ancient Civilizations and Ruins of Turkey: From Prehistoric Times until the End of the Roman Empire [translated by John Whybrow and Mollie Emre]. Istanbul: Haşet Kitabevi.
Algaze, Guillermo. 1989. “The Uruk Expansion: Cross-Cultural Exchange in Early Mesopotamian Civilization.” Current Anthropology 30: 571-608.
Allen, W.E.D. 1927. “New Political Boundaries in the Caucasus.” The Geographical Journal 69(5): 430-441.
Allen, W.E.D. 1929. “The March-Lands of Georgia.” The Geographical Journal 74(2): 135-156.
Allen, W.E.D. 1942. “The Caucasian Borderland.” The Geographical Journal 99(5/6): 225-237.
Allen, W.E.D.; Paul Muratoff. 1953. Caucasian Battlefields: A History of the Wars on the Turko-Caucasian Frontier (1828-1921). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allen, W.E.D. 1971. A History of the Georgian People. New York: routledge & Kegan paul.
Allsen, Thomas T. 2001. Culture and Conquest in Mongol Eurasia. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Alpago-Novello, A.; V. Beridze; J. Lafontaine-Dosogne. 1980. Art and Architecture in Medieval Georgia. Louvain-la-Neuve.
Altstadt, Audrey L. 1992. The Azerbaijani Turks: Power and Identity under Russian Rule. Stanford: hoover Institution press.
Akurgal, Ekrem. 1978. Ancient Civilizations and Ruins of Turkey: From Prehistoric Times until the End of the Roman Empire [trans. John Whybrow and Mollie Emre]. Istanbul: Haşet Kitabevi.
Amichba, G. 1988. Abkhazija i Abkhazy v Srednevekovykh Gruzinskikh Povestvovatel›nykh Istochnikakh [Abkhazia and the Abkhazians in Georgian Narrative Sources of the Middle Ages]. tbilisi.
Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi; Henk Howeling (eds.) 2005. “Central Eurasia in Global Politics: Conflict, Security and Development (2nd Edition)”. International Studies in Sociology and Social Anthropology 92. Leiden: Brill.
Amirkhanov, H. A.; M. V. Anikovitch; I. A. Borziak. 1993. “Problem of Transition from Mousterian to Upper paleolithic on the territory of russian plain and Caucasus.“ L’Anthropologie 97: 311-330.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 225
Anderson, Andrew Runni. 1928. “Alexander at the Caspian Gates.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 59: 130-163.
Anderson, J. G. C. 1922. “Pompey’s Campaign against Mithradets.” The Journal of Roman Studies, 12: 99-105.
Apakidze, A.; G. Kipiani; V. Nikolaishvili. 2004. “A Rich Burial from Mtskheta (Caucasian Iberia).” Ancient West and East 3(1), (ed. G. Tsetskladze).
Aruz, Joan; Ronald Wallenfels (eds.) 2003. Art of the First Cities: the Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art; New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ascher, Iver; Alexandra Patten; Denise Monczewski (eds.) 2000. “State Building and the Reconstruction of Shattered Societies: 1999 Caucasus Conference Report.” Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies, Berkeley: UC Press, 1-51. Online: http://repositories.cdlib.org/iseees/bps/2000 02-conf.
Ash, Rhiannon. 1999. “An Exemplary Conflict: Tacitus’ Parthian Battle Narrative (‘Annals’ 6.34-35).” Phoenix 53(1/2): 114-135.
Atıl, Esin. 1987. The Age of Sultan Süleyman the Magnificent. Washington: National Gallery of Art.
Aydin, Mustafa. 2004. “Foucault’s Pendulum: Turkey in Central Asia and the Caucasus.” Turkish Studies 5(2): 1-22.
Aydingun, Aysegul. 2002. “Creating, Recreating and Redefining Ethnic Identity: Ahıska/Meskhetian Turks in Soviet and post-Soviet contexts.” Central Asian Survey 21(2): 185-197.
Baddeley, John F. 1940. The Rugged Flanks of Caucasus (2 vols.). London: Humphrey Milford/Oxford University Press.
Balat, Mustafa. 2006. “The Case of Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Oil Pipeline System: A Review.” Energy Sources part B (1): 117-126.
Balci, Bayram; Raoul Motika. 2007. “Islam in Post-Soviet Georgia.” Central Asian Survey 26(3): 335-353.
Bar-Yosef, Ofer; Anna Belfer-Cohen; Daniel S. Adler. 2006. “The Implications of the Middle-Upper Paleolithic Chronological Boundary in the Caucasus to eurasian prehistory.” Anthropologie 19(1): 49-60.
Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 2007. “The Archaeological Framework of the Upper Paleolithic Revolution.” Diogenes 214: 3-18.
Barylski, Robert V. 1994. “The Russian Federation and Eurasia’s Islamic Crescent.” Europe-Asia Studies 46(3): 389-416.
Basilov, Vladimir N. (ed.) 1989. Nomads of Eurasia [trans. By Dana Levy and Joel Sackett]. Los Angeles: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, in association with University of Washington Press.
Basirov, Oric. 2001 “Evolution of the Zoroastrian Iconography and Temple Cults.” ANES 38: 160-177.
Bates, Daniel G. 1973. Nomads and Farmers: A Study of the Yörük of Southeastern Turkey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Belykov, Boris. 1999. “The Caucasus: Marginal Notes from a Diary.” Iran and the Caucasus 3(1999-2000): 367-374.
Benet, Sula. 1974. Abkhasians: The Long-Living People of the Caucasus: Case Studies in General Anthropology. Stanford University; New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, Inc.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor226
Bolukbasi, Suha. 1998. “The Controversy over the Caspian Sea Mineral Resources: Conflict Perceptions, Clashing Interests.” Europe-Asia Studies 50(3): 397-414.
Bonner, Arthur. 2005. “Turkey, the European Union and Paradigm Shifts.” Middle East Policy 12(1): 44-71.
Bosworth, A.B. 1977. “Arrian and the Alani.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 81: 217-255.
Boyle, Katie; Colin Renfrew; Marsha Levine (ed.) 2002. Ancient Interactions: East and West in Eurasia. Cambridge: Oxbow Books.
Bram, Chen. 1999. “Circassian Re-immigration to the Caucasus.” in Weil, S. (ed.) Routes and Roots: Emigration in a Global Perspective. Jerusalem: Magnes: 205-222.
Braud, David. 1994. Georgia in Antiquity: A History of Colchis and Transcaucasian Iberia, 550BC-562AD. Oxford: Clarendon press.
Braund, David. 2003. “Notes from the Black Sea and Caucasus: Arrian, Phlegon and Flavian Inscriptions.” Ancient Civilizations 9(3-4): 175-191.
Bremmer, Jan N. 1998. “The Myth of the Golden Fleece.” Journal of Ancient and Near Eastern Religions (JANER) 6: 9-38.
Brinton, Daniel G. 1895. “The Protohistoric Ethnography of Western Asia.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 34(147): 71-102.
Brodie, Neil. (ed.) 2006. Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade. Gainesville, FL: University press of Florida.
Brook, Stephen. 1992. Claws of the Crab: Georgia and Armenia in Crisis. London: Sinclair-Stevenson.
Brown, Cameron S. 2002. “Observations from Azerbaijan.” MERIA 6(4).
Bryer, Antony. 1988. Peoples and Settlement in Anatolia and the Caucasus, 800-1900. Farnham, UK: Ashgate publishing Co.
Bullough, Vern L. 1963. “The Roman Empire vs. Persia, 363-502: A Study of Successful Deterrence.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 7(1): 55-68.
Burney, C.A. 1958. “Eastern Anatolia in the Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age.” Anatolian Studies 8(1958): 157-209.
Burney, Charles; David Marshall Lang. 1971. The Peoples of the Hills: Ancient Ararat and the Caucasus. New York: praeger.
Burton-Brown, T. 1951. Excavations in Azarbaijan, 1948. London: Murray.
BTC Company Turkey; British Institute at Ankara; Gazi University-ARCED. 2007. A Pipeline through History. ankara: Baku-tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline Company.
Burdett, A. L. (ed.) 1996. Caucasian Boundaries: Documents and Maps, 1802-1946. Slough, UK: Archive Editions.
Catford, J.C. 1977. “Mountain of Tongues: The Languages of the Caucasus.” Annual Review of Anthropology 6: 283-314.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 227
Chistyakov, D. A. 1985. The Mousterian cultures of the Black Sea coast (in Russian) [Dissertation (unpublished)]. St petersburg.
Chubinashvili, G. 1940. Sioni of Bilnisi (Investigation of History of Georgian Architecture). tbilisi.
Chubinashvili, T. 1965. Kura-Araxes Culture. tbilisi.
Christian, David. 1998. A History of Russia, Central Asia, and Mongolia. Malden, Ma: Blackwell publishers.
Cohen, V. Y.; V. N. Stepanchu. 1999. “Late Middle and Early Upper Paleolithic Evidence from the East European Plain and Caucasus: A New Look at Variability, Interactions and Transitions.” Journal of World Prehistory 13(3): 265-319.
Comneno, Maria Adelaide Lala. 1997 “Nestorianism in Central Asia during the First Millennium: archaeological evidence.” Journal of the Assyrian Academic Society XI(1): 20-67.
Cornell, Svante E.; S. Frederick Starr. 2006. “The Caucasus: A Challenge for Europe.” Silk Road Paper (June 2006): 1-87.
Corzine, Robert; Susan Glendinning; Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Pipeline Company. 2006. BTC. Baku: Digiflame Productions, “for the BTC Pipeline Company.”
Crecelius, Daniel; Gotcha Djaparidze. 2002. “Relations of the Georgian Mamluks of Egypt with their Homeland in the Last Decades of the Eighteenth Century.” JESHO 45(3): 320-341.
Cruz-Uribe, Eugene. 2003. “Qanats in the Achaemenid Period.” Bibliotheca Orientalis LX(5-6): 538-544.
Curtis. Glen E. (ed.) 1995. Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Country Studies. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. Washington, D.C.: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.
Dale, Catherine. 1995. “Georgia: Development and Implications of the Conflicts in Abkhazia and South Ossetia.” Conflicts in the Caucasus in Conference. Oslo: International peace research Institute.
Davis-Kimball, Jeanine; Vladimir A. Bashilov; Leonid T. Yablonsky (eds.) 1995. Nomads of the Eurasian Steppes in the Early Bronze Age. Berkeley, CA: Zinat Press.
Djaparidze, O. 2006. Kartveli eris etnogenezisis sataveebtan [At the beginning of Georgian ethnogenesis]. Tbilisi: Artanuji (in Georgian).
Джафарзаде, И. М. Гобустан. Баку, 1973
Djobadze, W. 1992. Early Medieval Georgian Monasteries in Historic Tao, Klarjet’i and Šavšet’i. Stuttgart.
Doronichev, Vladimir B. 2008. “The Lower Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus: A Reappraisal of the Data and New Approaches.” Paleoanthropology 2008: 107-157.
Dowsett, C. J. F. 1957. “A Neglected Passage in the ‘History of the Caucasian Albanians.’” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 19(3): 456-468.
Dumas, Alexandre. 1895. Tales of the Caucasus: The Ball of Snow and Sultanetta. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
Dumitrescu, Vladimir. 1970. “The Chronological Relations between the Cultures of the Eneolithic Lower Danube and Anatolia and the Near East.” American Journal of Archaeology 74(1): 43-50.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor228
Edens, Christopher. 1995. “Transcaucasia at the End of the Early Bronze Age,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 299/300, The Archaeology of Empire in Ancient Anatolia: 53-64.
Edens, Christopher. 1997. Review of: Chataigner, Christine. La Transcaucasie au Néolithique et au Chalcolithique, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 306: 89-91.
Edgar, Adrienne L. 2001. “Identities, Communities, and Nations in Central Asia: A Historical Perspective.” Presentation from “Central Asia and Russia: Responses to the ‘War on Terrorism.’” panel discussion held at the University of California, Berkeley on October 29, 2001, Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies; the Berkeley program in Soviet and post-Soviet Studies; the Caucasus and Central asia program; and the Institute of International Studies at UC Berkeley: 1-7.
Эфендиев, O. Азербайджанское государство Сефевидов в начале XVI века, Баку, 1981.
English, Patrick T. 1959. “Cush*tes, Colchians, and Khazars.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 18(1): 49-53.
Fərəcova, Məlahət N. [= Farajova, Malahat N.] and Azerbaijan. Mədəniyyət vä Turizm Nazirliyi. 2009. Azərbaycan qayaüstü incəsənəti = Rock art of Azerbaijan. Baku: Aspoliqraf.
Ferguson, R. James. 2005. “Rome and Parthia: Power Politics and Diplomacy Across Cultural Frontiers.” Centre for east-West Cultural and economic Studies (CeWCeS) Research Paper(12), December 2005. Bond University, AU. http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cewces papers/10
Foltz, Richard C. 2000. Religions of the Silk Road: Overland Trade and Cultural Exchange from Antiquity to the Fifteenth Century. New York: St. Martin’s press.
Frye, Richard N. 1972. “Byzantine and Sassanian Trade Relations with Northeastern Russia.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 26: 263-269.
Furlong, Pierce James. 2007. “Aspects of Ancient Near Eastern Chronology (c.1600-700 BC).” PhD Dissertation, University of Melbourne: 464.
Gabunia, Leo; Vekua, Abesalom; Lordkipanidze, David. 2000. “The Environmental Contexts of Early Human Occupation of Georgia (Transcaucasia). Journal of Human Evolution 38: 785-802.
Gagoshidze, I. 1979. Samadlo, Archaeological Excavations. tbilisi.
Gambashidze, I.; A. Hauptmann; R. Slotta; U. Yalcin. 2001. Bochum, Georgien – Schätze aus dem Land des Goldenen Vlies (Katalog der Ausstellung des Deutschen Bergbau-Museums Bochum). Hrgs: 136-141.
Gamqrelidze, G.; M. Pirkskhalava; G. Qipiani. 2005. Problems of the Military History of Ancient Georgia. Georgia.
Gasanov, Magomed. 2001. “On Christianity in Dagestan.” Iran & the Caucasus 5: 79-84.
Geiger, Bernhard; Tibor Halasi-Kun; Aert H. Kuipers; Karl H. Menges. Peoples and Languages of the Caucasus. A Synopsis. Mouton & Co.: Gravenhage, 1959.
Georgian National Museum. Otar Lordkipanidze Centre of Archaeology. 2010. Bako-T‛bilisi-Jeihani Samxret‛ Kavkasiis Milsadeni da Ark‛eologia Sak‛art‛veloši = Rescue archaeology in Georgia: the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan and South Caucasian Pipelines. Tbisili: Georgian National Museum.
Giyasi, Jaffar. 1994. Azerbaijan: Fortresses – Castles. Baku: Interturan.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 229
Glinika, Svetlana P.; Dorothy J. Rosenberg. 2003. “Social and Economic Decline as Factors in Conflict in the Caucasus.” Discussion Paper No. 2003/18, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research (WIDER): 1-36.
Gobejishvili, G. 1981. Bedeni Kurgan Culture. tbilisi.
Gogadze, E. 1972. The Chronology and Genesis of the Trialeti Kurgan Culture. tbilisi.
Golovanova, L. V.; V. B. Doronichev. 2003. “The Middle Paleolithic of the Caucasus.” Journal of World Prehistory 17 (1): 71-140.
Goluboff, Sacha L.; Samira Karaeva. 2006. “Azerbaijani Ethnography: Views from Inside and Outside.” Journal of the Society of the Anthropology of Europe 5(1): 15-21.
Goluboff, Sacha L. 2008. “Patriarchy through Lamentation in Azerbaijan.” American Ethnologist 35(1): 81-94.
Gorny, Ronald L. 1989. “Environment, Archaeology, and History in Hittite Anatolia.” The Biblical Archaeologist 52(2/3): 78-96.
Grant, Bruce. 2004. “An Average Azeri Village (1930): Remembering Rebellion in the Caucasus Mountains.” Slavic Review 63(4): 705-731.
Grant, Bruce. 2002. “The Good Russian Prisoner: Naturalizing Violence in the Caucasus Mountains.” Cultural Anthropology 20(1): 39-67.
Greppin, John A. C. 1991. “The Survival of Ancient Anatolian and Mesopotamian Vocabulary until the present.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 50(3): 203-207.
Гусейнов, М.М. Ранние стадии заселения человека в пещере Азых. Ученые записки Аз.Гос.Универ., сер. истории и философии, № 4. Баку, 1979.
Гусейнов, М.М. Древний палеолит Азербайджана. Баку, 1985.
Halliday, Fred; Maxine Molyneux. 1986. “Letter from Baku: Soviet Azerbaijan in the 1980s.” MERIP Middle East Report No.138, Women and Politics in the Middle East (Jan-Feb.): 31-33.
Harmatta, Janos (ed.) 1998. History of Civilizations of Central Asia, Vol. II: The Development of sedentary and nomadic civilizations: 700B.C. to A.D. 250. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers private Ltd.
Harris, Alice. 1991. Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus (Anatolian and Caucasian Studies). Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.
Harris, David R. (ed.) 1996. The Origins and Spread of Agriculture and Pastoralism in Eurasia. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution press.
Henze, Paul. B. 2001. “The Land of Many Crossroads: Turkey’s Caucasian Initiatives.” Orbis 45(1): 81-91.
Herzig, Edmund. 1999. The New Caucasus: Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia. London: pinter.
Herzog, Christoph; Raoul Motika. 1998. “Orientalism ‘Alla Turca’: Late 19th/ Early 20th Century Ottoman Voyages into the Muslim ‘Outback.’” Die Welt des Islams, New Ser., 40(2): 139-195.
Heyat, Farideh. 2006. “Globalization and Changing Gender Norms in Azerbaijan.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 8(3): 394-412.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor230
Heydar Aliyev Foundation. 2010. “The First Inhabitants of Azerbaijan.” Baku: Heydar Aliyev Foundation. Accessed November 12, 2010. http://www.azerbaijan.az/portal/History/Ancient/ancient_e.html
Hill, Fiona; Omer Taspinar. 2006. “Russia and Turkey in the Caucasus: Moving Together to Preserve the Status Quo?” Paris: IFRI research Programme Russia/CIS, Institut Français des Relations Internationales.
Hoff*cker, John F. 2007. “Representation and Recursion in the Archaeological Record.” J. Archaeol. Method Theory 14: 359-387.
Holmer, Arthur. 2002. “The Iberian-Caucasian Connection in a Typological Perspective.” Birgit & Gad Rausings Stiftelse för humanistisk forskning: 1-35.
Hoppál, Mihály. (ed.) 1984. Shamanism in Eurasia. Göttingen: Edition Herodot.
Horn, Cornelia B. 1998. “St. Nino and the Christianization of Pagan Georgia.” Medieval Encounters 4(3): 242-264.
Hovey, Edmund Otis. 1904. “Southern Russia and the Caucasus Mountains.” Bulletin of the American Geographical Society 36(6): 327-341.
Hunter, Shireen T. 2006. “Borders, Conflict, and Security in the Caucasus: The Legacy of the Past.” SAIS Review 26(1): 111-125.
Hunter, Shireen T. 1994. The Transcaucasus in Transition: Nation-Building and Conflict. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Husseinov, M.M. 2005. The Azykh Cave. Baku, The Academy of Science of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist republic.
Idil, Vedat. 1987. Ankara: the Ancient Sites and Museums. English Version. Istanbul: Net Turistik Yayinlar A.S.
Ismailov, Eldar; Vladimir Papava. 2006. The Central Caucasus: Essays on Geopolitical Economy. Stockholm: Ca & CC press.
Ivanov, Vyacheslav, V. (n.d.) “Comparative Notes on Hurro-Urartian, Northern Caucasian and Indo-European.” unpublished manuscript: 1-116.
Johanson, Lars. 1999. Discoveries on the Turkic Linguistic Map. Swedish research Institute in Istanbul, (SKRIFTER), Publication 5: Stockholm.
Jones-Bley, Karlene; D.G. Zdanovich. (eds.). 2002. Complex societies of Central Eurasia from the 3rd to the 1st millennium BC: regional specifics in light of global models. Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man.
Jones, Stephen F. 1987. “The Establishment of Soviet Power in Transcaucasia: the Case of Georgia 1921-1928.” Soviet Studies 40(4): 616-639.
Jones, Stephen F. 1998. “Democracy from Below? Interest Groups in Georgian Society.” Slavic Review 59(1): 42-73.
Kacharava, D.; G. Kvirvelia. 2008. Wine, Worship, and Sacrifice: the Golden Graves of Ancient Vani. (With essays by A. Chqonia, N. Lordkipanidze, and M. Vickers. Institute for the Study of the Ancient World, in association with Princeton University Press.
Касимова, P.M. Первые палеоаптропологические находки в Кобыстане Журн. “Вопросы антропологии” вып 46. Москва – 1974.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 231
Kakhhidze, A.; M. Vickers. 2004. Pichvnari 1: Results of Excavations Conducted by the Joint British-Georgian Expedition, 1998-2002: Greeks and Colchians on the East Coast of the Black Sea. Oxford: Batumi.
Karagiannis, Emmanuel. 2004. “The Turkish-Georgian partnership and the pipeline factor.” Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans 6(1): 13-26.
Kavtaradze, Giorgi L. 2004. “The Chronology of the Caucasus during the Early Metal Age: Observations from Central trans-Caucasus.” In: Sagona, a. (ed.) A View from the Highlands: Archaeological Studies in Honour of Charles Burney (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 12). Leuven: Peeters.
Kavtaradze, Giorgi L. 1999. The Importance of Metallurgical Data for the Formation of a Central Transcaucasian Chronology. In The Beginnings of Metallurgy: Proceedings of the International Conference. Bochum.
Kazemzadeh, Firuz. 1951. The Struggle for Transcaucasia (1917-1921). New York: philosophical Library.
Keaveney, Arthur. 1982. “The King and the War-Lords: Romano-Parthian Relations Circa 64-53 B.C.” American Journal of Philology 103(4): 412-428.
Kelly-Buccllati, Marilyn. 1974. “The Excavations at Korucutepe, Turkey, 1968-1970: Preliminary Report. Part V: The Early Bronze Age Pottery and Its Affinities.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 33(1): 44-54.
Keun, Odette. 1924. In the Land of the Golden Fleece: Through Independent Menchevist Georgia. London: John Lane.
Khimshiashvili, A. 1995-1996. “A Group of Iberian Fire Temples (4th Century BC – 2nd Century AD).” Archaeologische Mitteilungen Aus Iran 28: 309-318.
Khoshtaria, D. 2009. “Past and Present of the Georgian Sinai: A Survey of Architectural History and Current State of Monasteries in Klarjeti.” In p. Soustal (ed.), Heilige Berge und Wusten: Byzanz und sein Unfeld. Wien: 77-81.
King, Charles. 2007. “Imagining Circassia: David Urquhart and the Making of North Caucasus Nationalism.” The Russian Review 66: 238-255.
Kinross, Patrick Balfour. 1977. The Ottoman Centuries: the Rise and Fall of the Turkish Empire. New York: Morrow.
Kipiani, G. 2004. “Achaemenid Heritage in Ancient Georgian Architecture.” ANES 41: 167-191.
Knaus, Florian. 2003. “Achaimeniden im Kaukasus.” Colloque L’archéologie de l’empire achéménide Paris, Collège de France, (21-22 Novembre 2003): 1-21.
Knaus, Florian. 2006. “Ancient Persia and the Caucasus.” Iranica Antiqua 16: 79-118.
Kohl, Philip L. 1989. “The Northern ‘Frontier’ of the Ancient Near East: Transcaucasia and central Asia Compared.” American Journal of Archaeology 92(4): 591-596.
Kohl, Philip L. 1998. “Nationalism and Archaeology: On the Constructions of Nations and the reconstructions of the remote past.” Annual review of Anthropology 27: 223-246.
Kohl, Philip L. 2001. “Nation-Building and the Archaeological Record.” in Nation and National Ideology Past, Presents and Prospects. proceedings of the International Symposium held at the New europe College, Bucharest (April 6-7, 2001): 184-208.
Kohl, Philip L. 2007. The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor232
Krainov, D. A. 1947. “New Mousterian sites in the Crimea and the Caucasus (in Russian).” Byulleten’ Komissii po Izucheniyu Chetvertichnogo Perioda 9: 23-35.
Kroll, Stephan. 2005. “The Southern Urmia basin in the early Iron Age.” Iranica Antiqua 15: 65-85.
Kuftin, B. 1941. Archaeological Excavations in Trialeti. tbilisi (in russian)
Kuftin, B. 1948. Archaeological Excavations of 1947 in Tsalka Region. tbilisi (in russian)
Kuhn, Steven L. “paleolithic archeology in turkey.” Evolutionary Anthropology 11: 198-210.
Kuipers, Aert H. 1960. Phoneme and Morpheme in Kabardian (Eastern Adyghe). ‘S-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co.
Kuzio, Taras. 2002. “History, Memory and Nation Building in the Post-Soviet Colonial Space.” Nationalities Papers 30(2): 241-264.
Lang, D. M. 1952. “Georgia and the Fall of the Safavi Dynasty.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 14(3): 523-539.
Lang, D. M. 1955. “Georgia in the Reign of Giorgi the Brilliant (1314-1346).” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 17(1): 74-91.
Lang, David Marshall. 1966. The Georgians. London: thames and hudson.
Lang, David Marshall. 1976. Lives and Legends of the Georgian Saints (revised edition). Crestwood, NY.
Levi, Scott. 1999. “India, Russia and the Eighteenth-Century Transformation of the Central Asian Caravan trade.” JESHO 42(2): 519-548.
Licheli, V. 1999. “St. Andrew in Samtskhe: Archaeological Proof?” In T. Mgaloblishvili (ed.) Ancient Christianity in the Caucasus. Iberica Caucasica. London: 27-34.
Licheli, Vakhtang. 2006. “New Archaeological Publications from Georgia.” Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia 12(3/4): 315-322.
Liubin, V. P. 1974. “The Environment and Primitive Man in the Pleistocene of the Caucasus.” (in Russian) In Primitive Man, His Material Culture and the Environment in the Pleistocene and Holocene. Moscow, Nauka: 167-177.
Liubin, V. P. 1977. Mousterian Cultures of the Caucasus. (in Russian) Leningrad, NAUKA.
Liubin, V. P. 1989. “The Palaeolithic of the Caucasus.” (in Russian) The Palaeolithic of the Caucasus and Northern Asia. Leningrad, Nauka.
Lloyd, Seton. 1989. Ancient Turkey: A Traveller’s History of Anatolia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lordkipanidze, M.; I. Katcharava. 1963. A Glimpse of Georgian History. tbilisi.
Lordkipanidze, O. (ed.) 1991. Archaeology of Georgia, Volume I. Tbilisi. (In Georgian)
Lordkipanidze, O. (ed.) 1992. Archaeology of Georgia, Volume II. Tbilisi. (In Georgian)
Lordkipanidze, O. 2000. Phasis, the River and City in Colchis. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Lordkipanidze, O. 2009. “Georgian Civilzation: Whence Does Its History Start?” Journal Iberia-Colchis 5: 126-133.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 233
Ludwig, Nadine. 2005. “Die Kachetische Keramik des I. Jts. V. Chr.- eine Einfuhrung.” ANES 42: 211-230.
Magnarella, Paul J.; Orhan Türkdoğan. 1976. “The Development of Turkish Social Anthropology.” Current Anthropology 17(2): 263-274.
Mair, Victor H. (ed.) 2006. Contact and Exchange in the Ancient World. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Makharadze, Z. 2007. “Noufelles Donnees sur le Chalolithique en Gergie Orientole.” In B. Lyonnet (ed.) Les Cultures du Caucase (VI-III millenoires avant notre ere). Leurs relations avec le Proche-Orient, Paris: 123-132.
Manning, Patrick. 2006. “hom*o Sapiens Populates the Earth: A Provisional Synthesis, Privileging Linguistic evidence.” Journal of World History 17(2): 115-158.
Manning, Sturt W.; Bernd Kromer; Peter Ian Kuniholm; Maryanne W. Newton. 2003. “Anatolian Tree Rings and a New Chronology for the east Mediterranean Bronze-Iron ages.” Science 294: 2532-2535.
Manning, Sturt W. 2003. “Confirmation of Near-Absolute Dating of East Mediterranean Bronze-Iron Dendrochronology.” Antiquity 77: 295.
Manning, Sturt W. 2006. “Chronology for the Aegean Late Bronze Age 1700-1400 B.C.” Science 312: 565-569.
Мансуров М. Палеолит Азербайджана. Международная научная конференция “Археология и этнология Кавказа”, Тбилиси, 2002.
Mənsurоv, Mənsur. Qafqazda ilk paleоlit abidələri. Azərbaycan arхeоlоgiyası və etnоqrafiyası jurnalı. № 2, 2003.
Margarian, Hayrapet. 2001. “The Nomads and Ethnopolitical Realities of Transcaucasia in the 11-14th Centuries.” Iran & the Caucasus 5: 75-78.
Mark, David E. 1996. “Eurasia Letter: Russia and the New Transcaucasus.” Foreign Policy 105 (Winter 1996-1997): 141-159.
Mars, Gerald; Yochanan Altman. 1983. “The Cultural Bases of Soviet Georgia’s Second Economy.” Soviet Studies 35(4): 546-560.
Marton, R.E.; E. Leorri; P. P. McLaughlin. 2007. “Holocene Sea Level and Climate Change in the Black Sea: Multiple Marine Incursions Related to Freshwater Discharge Events.” Quaternary International 167-168 (2007): 61-72.
Mason, R.B.; L. Golombek. 2003. “The Petrography of Iranian Safavid Ceramics.” Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 251-261.
McKay, John P. 1984. “Baku Oil and Transcaucasian Pipelines, 1883-1891: A Study in Tsarist Economic policy.” Slavic Review 43(4): 604-623.
Meeker, Michael E. 1971. “Black Sea Turks: Some Aspects of their Ethnic and Cultural Background.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 2(4): 318-345.
Mellaart, James. 1958. “The End of the Early Bronze Age in Anatolia and the Aegean.” American Journal of Archaeology 62(1): 9-33.
Merlin, M.D. 2002. “Archaeological Evidence for the Tradition of Psychoactive plant use in the Old World.” Economic Botany 57(3): 295-323.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor234
Meskell, Lynn. 2002. “The Intersection of Identity and Politics in Archaeology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 279-301.
Metreveli, Roin. 1993. Georgia. tbilisi: N. Solod publishing house.
Mikasa, Takahito (ed.) 1995. Essays on Ancient Anatolia and its Surrounding Civilizations. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Minorsky, V. 1953. “Caucasica IV.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 15(3): 504-529.
Moorey, P. R. S. 1986. “The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C.” World Archaeology 18(2): 196-215.
Morin, J. 2003. “Long-Term Cross-Cultural Relations and State-Formation in Transcaucasian Iberia: An annaliste perspective.” ANES 41: 108-119.
Muehlfried, Florian. 2007. “Sharing the Same Blood-Culture and Cuisine in the Republic of Georgia.” Anthropology of Food S3 (Décembre 2007) Food Chains/Les chaines alimentaires: 1-15.
Museyibli, Najaf. “Chalcolitic settlement Beyuk Kesik.” Baku, 2007.
Museyibli, Najaf. “ethnocultural Connections between the region of the Near east and the Caucasus in the IV millennium BC”. Azerbaijan- Land between East and West. Berlin, 2009.
Museyibli, Najaf. “Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline boosts Azerbaijani Archaeology. Vision of Azerbaijan summer”. 1 volume. Baku, 2007.
Мусеибли, Наджаф. “Позднеэнеолитические курганы Акстафинского района”. Материалы международной научной конференции “Археология, этнология, фольклористика Кавказа”. Баку, 2005.
Мусеибли, Наджаф. “Курган Гасансу эпохи средней бронзы”. Материалы международной научной конференции. “Археология, этнология, фольклористика Кавказа”. Тбилиси, 2007.
Нариманов, И. Г. Культура древнейшего земледельческо-скотоводческого населения Азербайджана. Баку, 1987.
Nanobashvili, Mariam. 2002. “The Development of Literary Contacts between the Georgians and the Arabic Speaking Christians in palestine from the 8th to the 10th century.” ARAM 15: 269-274.
Narimanishvili, G. K. 1990. Pottery of Kartli in the 5th – 1st centuries BC. tbilisi (in russian).
Narimanishvili, G. 2004. “Red-Painted Pottery of the Achaemenid and Post-Achaemenid Periods from Caucasus (Iberia): Stylistic analysis and Chronology.” ANES 41: 120-166.
Narimanishvili, G. 2006. “Saphar-Kharaba Cemetery.” Dziebani 17-18: 92-126.
Nasidze, I. 2001. “Alu Insertion Polymorphisms and the Genetic Structure of Human Populations from the Caucasus.” European Journal of Human Genetics 9: 267-272.
Nazidze, I. 1998. “Genetic Evidence Concerning the Origins of South and North Ossetians.” Annals of Human Genetics 68: 588-599.
Nasidze, Ivane; Mark Stoneking. 2001. “Mitochondrial DNA Variation and Language Replacements in the Caucasus.” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1197-1206.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 235
Nasmyth, Peter. 1998. Georgia: In the Mountains of Poetry. New York: St. Martin’s press.
Nichols, Deborah L.; Rosemary A. Joyce; Susan D. Gillespie. 1997. “Is Archaeology Anthropology?” APa 13(1): 3-13.
Nicholas, Johanna. 1997. “Modeling Ancient Population Structures and Movement in Linguistics.” Annual Reviews in Anthropology 26: 359-84.
Norling, Nicklas; Niklas Swanstrom. 2007. “The Virtues and Potential Gains of Continental trade in Eurasia.” Asian Survey 17(3): 351-373.
Nourzhanov, Kirill. 2006. “Caspian Oil: Geopolitical Dreams and Real Issues.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 60(1): 59-66.
Ogden, Dennis. 1984. “Britain and Soviet Georgia, 1921-22.” Journal of Contemporary History 23(2), Bolshevism and the Socialist Left: 245-258.
O’Laughlin, John; Vladimir Kolossov; Jean Radvanyi. 2007. “The Caucasus in a Time of Conflict, Demographic Transition, and Economic Change.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 48(2): 135-156.
Olszewski, Devorah; Harold L. Dibble. (ed.) 1993. The Paleolithic Prehistory of the Zagros-Taurus. philadelphia: University Museum of Pennsylvania.
Otte, Marcel. 2007. “The Origins of Language: Material Sources.” Diogenes 214: 49-59.
Özendes, Engin. 1987. Photography in the Ottoman Empire, 1839-1919. Beyoğlu-Istanbul : Haşet Kitabevi.
Ozfirat, Aynur. 2007. “A Survey of Pre-Classical Sites in Eastern Turkey. Fourth Preliminary Report: The Eastern Shore of Lake Van.” ANES 44: 113-140.
Ozturkmen, Arzu. 2005. “Rethinking Regionalism: Memory of Change in a Turkish Black Sea Town.” East European Quarterly 39(1): 47-62.
Palumbi, Giulio. 2003. “Red-Black Pottery: Eastern Anatolian and Transcaucasian Relationships around the Mid-Fourth Millenium BC.” ANES 40: 80-134.
Parsons, J.W.R. 1982. “National Integration in Soviet Georgia.” Soviet Studies 34(4): 547-569.
Pelkmans, Mathjis. 1998? “The Wounded Body: Reflections on the Demise of the ‘Iron Curtain’ between Georgia and Turkey.” Amsterdam School of Social Science Research, unpublished manuscript: 1-13. Web link: http://condor.depaul.edu/~rrotenbe/aeer/v17n1/Pelkmans.pdf
Percovich, Luciana. 2004. “Europe’s First Peoples: Female Cosmogonies before the Arrival of the Indoeuropean peoples.” Feminist Theology 13(1): 26-39.
Peterkin, Gail Larsen; Harvey M. Bricker; Paul Mellars (eds.) 1993. Washington DC: American anthropological association.
Peterson, Alexandros. 2002. “Integrating Azerbaijan, Georgia and Turkey with the West: The Case of the East-West transport Corridor.” CSIS Commentary Sept.10, 2007: 1-20.
Pitskhelauri, K. 1997. “Waffen der Bronzezeit aus Ost-Georgien.” Archaeologie in Eurasien. Gottingen: 4.
Pogrebova, Maria. 2003. “The Emergence of Chariots and Riding in the South Caucasus.” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 22(4): 397-409.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor236
Popjanevski, Johanna; Niklas Nilsson. 2006. “National Minorities and the State in Georgia.” Conference Report, Silk Road Studies Program, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS, Aug 2006: 1-32.
Preucel, Robert W.; Ian Hodder (eds.) 1996. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader. Cambridge, Ma: Blackwell publishers.
Qajar, Chingiz. 2000. The Famous Sons of Ancient and Medieval Azerbaijan. S. N.: Azerbaijan
Qaukhchishvili, S. (ed.) 1955. Kartlis Tskhovreba (Life of Georgia). tbilisi.
Raballand, Gael; Ferhat Esen. 2007. “Economics and Politics of Cross-Border Oil Pipelines: the Case of the Caspian Basin.” AEJ 5: 133-146.
Radvanyi, Jean; Shakhmardan S. Muduyev. 2007. “Challenges Facing the Mountain Peoples of the Caucasus.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 48(2): 157-177.
Ramezani, Elias; Mohammad R. Marvie Mohadjer; Hans-Dieter Knapp; Hassan Ahmadi; Hans Joosten. 2008. “The late-Holocene Vegetation History of the Central Caspian (Hyrcanian) Forests of Northern Iran.” The Holocene 18: 307-321.
Rapp, Gregory. 2002. “The Conversion of K‘art‘li: the Shatberdi Variant, Kek.Inst.S-1141.” Le Museon 119(1-2): 169-229.
Reinhold, Sabine. 2003. “Traditions in Transition: Some Thought on Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Burial Costumes from the Northern Caucasus.” European Journal of Archaeology 6(1): 25-54.
Roberts, Elizabeth. 1992. Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. Brookfield, CT: Millbrook Press.
Romer, F. E. 1979. “Gaius Caesar›s Military Diplomacy in the East.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 109: 199-214.
Rosen, Roger. 1999. Georgia: A Sovereign Country of the Caucasus. Sheung Wan, hong Kong: Odyssey publications.
Rosen, Roger. 1992. The Georgian Republic. Lincolnwood, IL: passport Books.
Roustaei, K. et al. 2004. “Recent Paleolithic Surveys in Luristan.” Current Anthropology 45(5): 692-707.
Rubinson, K. S.; A. G. Sagona. 2008. Ceramics in Transitions: Chalcolithic through Iron Age in the Highlands of the Southern Caucasus and Anatolia. (Ancient Near Eastern Studies Series # 27) Oakville CT: David Brown (Oxbow).
Sagona, Antoni; Claudia Sagona. 2000. “Excavations at Sos Hoyuk, 1998 to 2000: Fifth Preliminary Report.” ANES 37: 56-127.
Salia, Kalistrat. 1983. History of the Georgian Nation (trans. by Katharine Vivian). Paris: N. Salia.
Sanikidze, Georgia; Edward W. Walker. 2004. “Islam and Islamic Practices in Georgia.” Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series: 1-42.
Scarce, Jennifer M. 1981. Middle Eastern Costume from the Tribes and Cities of Iran and Turkey. edinburgh: royal Scottish Museum.
Scheffler, Thomas. 1998. “’Fertile Crescent’, ‘Orient’, ‘Middle East’: The Changing Mental Maps of Southwest asia.” European Review of History 10(2): 253-272.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 237
Secretariat of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. 1999. NATO and Azerbaijan: Mutually beneficial cooperation. a nkara, turkey: Nurol printing house.
Şenyurt, S. Yücel; Atakan Akçay; Yalçin Kamiş. 2006. Yuceoren: Dogu Kilikya’da bir Helenistik-Roma nekropolu. Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan ham petrol boru hatti projesi arkeolojik kurtarma kazilari yayinlari: 1 [a hellenistic and roman Necropolis in eastern Kilikia. Baku-tbilisi-Ceyhan crude oil pipeline project publications of archaeological salvage excavations: 1]. Ankara: Gazi University Research Center for Archaeology.
Seton, Lloyd. 1989. Ancient Turkey: a Traveler’s History of Anatolia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shaw, Wendy M. K. 2003. Possessors and Possessed: Museums, Archaeology, and the Visualization of history in the Late Ottoman Empire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shnirelman, Victor. 2005. “The Politics of a Name: Between Consolidation and Separation in the Northern Caucasus.” Acta Slavica Iaponica 23: 37-73.
Singer, Itamar. 2005. “On Luwians and Hittites.” Biblioteca Orientalis 62(5-6): 431-452.
Sinitsyn, A.A.; J. F. Hoff*cker. 2006. “Radiocarbon Dating and Chronology of the Early Upper Paleolithic at Kostenki.” Quaternary International 152-153: 164-174.
Silogava, Valery; Kakha Shengelia. 2007. History of Georgia: From the Ancient Times through the Rose Revolution. Tbilisi: Caucuses University Publishing House.
Smeets, Rieks. 1994. The Indigenous Languages of the Caucasus. Delmar, NY: Caravan Books.
Smith, Adam T.; Karen S. Robinson. 2003. Archaeology in the Borderlands: Investigations in Caucasia and Beyond. Monograph 47, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA. Los Angeles: UC Press.
Smith, Adam T. 1999. “The Making of an Urartian Landscape in Southern Transcaucasia: A Study of Political architectonics.” American Journal of Archaeology 103(1): 45-71.
Smith, Adam T. 2004. “The End of the Essential Archaeological Subject.” Archaeological Dialogues 11(1): 1-20.
Smith, Adam T. 2005. “Prometheus Unbound: Southern Caucasia in Prehistory.” Journal of World Prehistory 19: 229-279.
Soloviev, L. N. 1956. The Significance of the Archaeological Method for the Study of the Karst of the Northern Part of the Caucasian Black Sea Coast (in Russian). ‘Karst questions in the South of the European USSR’. Kiev, AN Ukrainian: 43-75.
Souleimanov, Emil; Ondrej Ditrych. 2007. “Iran and Azerbaijan: A Contested Neighborhood.” Middle East Policy 14(2): 101-116.
Starr, Frederick S.; Svante E. Cornell. (eds.) 2005. The Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan Pipeline: Oil Window to the West. Washington, D.C.: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hopkins University, School of Advanced International Studies.
Starr, Frederick S. (ed.) 2007. The New Silk Roads: Transport and Trade in Greater Central Asia. Washington, D.C.: Central Asia-Caucasus Institute, Johns Hopkins University, SAIS.
Stephl, Marion. 2004. “A Cluster-Based Approach to Heritage Tourism in Georgia: Sustainable Tourism as a Strategy towards Export-Diversification for an Economy in Transition.” Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades Magistra (FH), FHS Kufstein Tirol, Studiengang Internationale Wirtschaft Management: 1-148.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavaliPast and Future Heritage in the Pipelines Corridor238
Stirling, Paul. (ed.) 1993. Culture and Economy: Changes in Turkish Villages. huntingdon: eothen.
Summers, G.D. 1993. “Archaeological Evidence for the Achaemenid Period in Eastern Turkey.” Anatolian Studies 43: 85-108.
Summers, G.D. 1997. “The Identification of the Iron Age City on Kerkenes Dag in Central Anatolia.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 56(2): 81-94.
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 2001. “Constructing Primordialisms: Old Histories for New Nations.” Journal of Modern History 73(4): 862-896.
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 1999. “Provisional Stabilities: the Politics of Identities in Post-Soviet Eurasia.” International Security 24(3): 139-178.
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 1994. The Making of the Georgian Nation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Suny, Ronald Grigor. (ed.) 1983. Transcaucasia: Nationalism and Social Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan press.
Swietochowski, Tadeusz. 1986. Soviet Azerbaijan Today: The Problems of Group Identity. Occasional Paper Vol. 211. Washington, D.C.: Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies.
Swietochowski, Tadeusz. 1985. Russian Azerbaijan, 1905-1920: The Shaping of National Identity in a Muslim Community. Soviet and East European Studies, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Swietochowski, Tadeusz. 1995. Russia and Azerbaijan: A Borderland in Transition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Takahito, Mikasa. (ed.) 1995. Essays on Ancient Anatolia and its Surrounding Civilizations. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
Takaoglu, Turan. 2000. “Hearth Structures in the Religious Pattern of Early Bronze Age Northeast Anatolia.” Anatolian Studies 50: 11-16.
Taylor, Paul Michael; Christopher R. Polglase; Jared M. Koller; Troy A. Johnson. 2010. AGT: Ancient Heritage in the BTC-SCP Pipeline Corridor – Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution. [Online publication, at:] http://www.agt.si.edu (Web design by Jared Koller and Michael Tuttle.)
Taylor, Paul Michael; David Maynard. 2011. Excavations on the BTC Pipeline, Azerbaijan. Forthcoming in: Internet Archaeology.
Tillier, Anne-Marie. 2007. “The Earliest hom*o Sapiens (Sapiens): Biological, Chronological and taxonomic perspectives.” Diogenes 214: 110-121.
Toumanoff, C. 1963. Studies in Christian Caucasian History. Washington, DC.
Tourovets, Alexandre. 2005. “Some Reflexions about the Relation Between the Architecture of Northwestern Iran and Urartu: the Layout of the Central Temple of Nush-I Djan.” Iranica Antiqua 15: 359-370.
Tretiakov, P. N.; A. L. Mongait. 1961. Contributions to the Ancient History of the U.S.S.R., with special reference to Transcaucasia. Selections from The Outline of the History of the U.S.S.R. Russian Translation Series of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 1(3). [Trans. Vladimir M. Maurin; edited by henry Field and paul tolstoy]. Cambridge, Ma: peabody Museum.
kulturuli memkvidreobis ZeglebiPmilsadenebis derefanSi, warsuli da momavali 239
Tsetskhladze, Gocha R. 1995. Review: Braund, D. Georgia in Antiquity. “A History of Colchis and Transcaucasian Iberia, 550 B. C.-A. D. 562.” In The Classical Review, New Series 45(2): 358-360.
Tsetskhladze, Gocha R. 2005. “The Caucasus and the Iranian World in the Early Iron Age: Two Graves from treli.” Iranica Antiqua 15: 437-446.
Велиев, С. С.; М. М. Мансуров. К вопросу о возрасте древнейших слоев Азыхской пещерной стоянки. Доклады Академии Наук Азербайджана, 1999, № 3-4).
Voultsiadou, Eleni; Apostolos Tatolas. 2005. “The Fauna of Greece and Adjacent Areas in the Age of Homer: Evidence from the First Written Documents of Greek literature.” Journal of Biogeography 32: 1875-1882.
Wells, R. Spencer et al. 2001. “The Eurasian Heartland: A Continental Perspective on Y-Chromosome Diversity.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98(18): 10244-10249.
Wheeler, Everett L. 1993. “Methodological Limits and the Mirage of Roman Strategy: Part I.” Journal of Military History 57(1): 7-41.
Whittock, Michael. 1959. “Ermolov-Proconsul of the Caucasus.” Russian Review 18(1): 53-60.
Wilson, Annalie; Terry Knott; Mehmet Binay. BP Azerbaijan SPU (Baku). 2006. The Shah Deniz Gas Story. Baku: BP Azerbaijan SPU.
Yakar, Jak. 2000. Prehistoric Anatolia: The Neolithic Transformation and the Early Chalcolithic Period. Monograph Series of the Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University. Tel Aviv: University of Tel Aviv.
Yakar, Jak. 2000. Ethnoarchaeology of Anatolia: rural Socio-Economy in the Bronze and Iron Ages. tel aviv University Institute for Archaeology Monograph Series (17). Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yener, K. Aslihan. 1995. “The Archaeology of Empire in Anatolia: Comments.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 299/300: 117-121.
Yener, K. Aslihan. 2000. The Domestication of Metals: The Rise of Complex Metal Industries in Anatolia. Boston: Brill.
Zamyatnin, S. N. 1940. “The Navalishinskaya and Akhshtyrskaya Caves on the Black Sea Coast of the Caucasus (in russian).” Byulleten’ Komissii po Izucheniyu Chetvertichnogo Perioda 6-7: 100-101.
Zamyatnin, S. N. 1950. “The Study of the Palaeolithic Period in the Caucasus 1936-1948 (in Russian).” Materialy po chetvertichnomu periodu SSSR 2: 127-139.
Zeder, Melinda A. 2000. “The Initial Domestication of Goats (Capra Hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 Years ago.” Science 287: 2254-2257.
Zimansky, Paul E. 1985. Ecology and Empire--The Structure of the Urartian State. Chicago, Ill.: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
Zimansky, Paul. 1995. “Urartian Material Culture as State Assemblage: An Anomaly in the Archaeology of empire.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 299/300: 103-115.